10.07.2015 Views

who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3901. Izaly Zemtsovsky, Russia, Leningrad. “Specifics of polyphonic articulation: Texture andtimbre.” 2. Barbara Krader, USA “Traditional polyphony in Bulgaria.” 3. Susanna Ziegler, Germany,Berlin. “ Caucasian polyphony in <strong>the</strong> mirror of German musicology.” 6. Margarita Mazo, USA “Types ofRussian Polyphony.” 7. Dragoslav Devich, Serbia, Yugoslavia “Traditional two-part singing in Serbia.” 8.Nguen Van Nam, Vietnam (Russia), Nalchik “Polyphonic types in traditional music of Vietnam.” 9.Tamaz Gabisonia, Georgia, Tbilisi State Conservatory. “Ostinato polyphony in Georgian traditionalmusic.” 10. Nailia Almeeva, Tatarstan (Russia), Kazan. “Fifth-Third texture (one of <strong>the</strong> types ofpolyphony) among Christened tartars and its analogues among <strong>the</strong> peoples of Middle Volga Region.” 11.Christopher Arakelov, Georgia, Tbilisi State. “Cadence in Georgian (Samegrelo) traditional polyphonicsongs.” 12. Igor Macievsky, Russia, Leningrad. “On <strong>the</strong> role of <strong>the</strong> socio-psychological factors in <strong>the</strong>establishing of polyphonic texture in <strong>the</strong> compositions of traditional instrumental ensembles.” 13. OlegGerasimov, Russia, Mari. Yoshkar-Ola. “Genre and regional peculiarities of Mari polyphony” 14. LarissaKhaltaeva, Kazakhstan, Alma-Ata. “Phenomenon of drone polyphony in <strong>the</strong> system of cosmogonist imagesof Turkic-Mongol peoples.” 15. Joseph Jordania, Georgia. Tbilisi. “Genesis of polyphony and <strong>the</strong> origins of<strong>the</strong> articulated speech.” 16. Martin Boiko, Latvia, Riga. “Ethno-historical aspects of Latvian dronepolyphony.” 17. Ketevan Baiashvili, Georgia, Tbilisi. “Problem of <strong>the</strong> origins of Georgian polyphonicdirges and funeral hymns.” 18. Eduard Barsegian. Armenia, Erevan. “On polyphony in Ancient Armenia.”19. Villis Bendorf, Latvia, Riga. “Some preliminary remarks on <strong>the</strong> links between Baltic and Caucasianpolyphony.” 20. Tamara Blaeva, North Caucasia (Russia), Nalchik. “Traditional types of polyphonictextures in Adighian traditional songs.” 21. Liudmila Boiarkina, Mordva (Russia), Saransk. “Mordvinianand South Russian polyphonic traditions (<strong>question</strong> of interrelationships).” 22. Nikolai Boiarkin, Mordva(Russia), Saransk. “On <strong>the</strong> issue of common features of traditional vocal and instrumental music ofMordva.” 23. Liubov Berger, Russia, Moscow. Georgian folk polyphony in <strong>the</strong> context of <strong>the</strong> origins ofWest European polyphony.” 24. Edisher Garakanidze, Georgia, Tbilisi. “Considerations of <strong>the</strong> origins ofGeorgian polyphony.” 25. Nato Zumbadze, Georgia, Tbilisi. “On antiphonal polyphony (on <strong>the</strong> materialsof women’s songs from East Georgia).” 26. Mzia Iashvili, Georgia, Tbilisi. “On structural principles ofGeorgian neumatic writing in <strong>the</strong> light of Ioanne Petritsi teaching.” 27. Viacheslav Kartsovnik, Russia,Leningrad. “Secondal diaphony in Medieval Italy and on Balkans.” 28. Mikhail Lobanov, Russia. Russiantraditional polyphony of Pynezh region according to contemporary materials (60 th anniversary ofpublication of “Pynezh songs” by E.V. Gippius and Z.V. Evald).” 29. Valerian Magradze, Georgia, Tbilisi.”Characteristic melodic formulas as important structural element of Meskhetian traditional music.” 30.Tamar Meskhi, Georgia, Tbilisi. “Georgian polyphonic urban songs.” 31. Iaroslav Mironenko, Moldavia,Kishinev . “On double nature of unison singing.” 32. A. Mozias, Russia, Leningrad. “On <strong>the</strong> study oftraditional polyphony from <strong>the</strong> point of view of singers behavior and self-assessment.” 33. MariamOsitashvili. Georgia, Tbilisi. “On interrelationships of <strong>the</strong> parts in Georgian chants.” 34. Daiva Rachiunaite,Lithuania, Vilnius. “The role of <strong>the</strong> “collector” in forming <strong>the</strong> sutartines.” 35. Maria Roditeleva, Russia,Ufa. Polyphony as <strong>the</strong> essence of <strong>the</strong> musical process in Russian folk music.” 36. V. Sai, Russia,Leningrad. “Elementary contrapuntal forms in musical cultures of written and oral traditions: Towards <strong>the</strong>establishing of <strong>the</strong> united <strong>the</strong>ory of <strong>the</strong> counterpoint.” 37. Vaike Sarv, Estonia, Tallinn. “Polyphonic dirgesin singing traditions of Setu.” 38. Elena Khodorkovskaia, Russia, Leningrad. “Problems of traditionalpolyphony in <strong>the</strong>oretical conception of B.L. Yavorsky.” 39. Nino Tsitsishvili, Georgia, Tbilisi. “Balkan-Georgian musical-ethnographic parallels.” 40. Evsevi Chokhonelidze, Georgia. Tbilisi State Conservatory.“The phenomenon of Georgian folk polyphony.”1989, Russia. The conference entitled “Vocal Polyphonyof <strong>the</strong> Peoples ofRussia” was held in <strong>the</strong> Russian city of Voronezh, from September 24 th -29 th 1989. It wasorganized by <strong>the</strong> Musicology and Folklore Committee of <strong>the</strong> Union of Soviet Composersand <strong>the</strong> Gnesin State Musical-Pedagogical Institute. Short versions of <strong>the</strong> papers (eachover three pages, some with musical examples) were published in Russian (seeEngovatova, 1989). Here is <strong>the</strong> list of scholars and <strong>the</strong>ir papers according to <strong>the</strong>conference program and <strong>the</strong> published materials (some of <strong>the</strong> papers were not publishedand <strong>the</strong>y are marked with *):1. B. Efimenkova*, Russia, Moscow. “Russian vocal polyphony in <strong>the</strong> light of <strong>the</strong> structuraltypologicalresearch.” 2. Yulia Evdokimova*, Russia, Moscow. “Principles of classification of <strong>the</strong> earlyforms of polyphony in foreign studies.” 3. Izaly Zemtsovsky, Russia, Leningrad. “Drone in <strong>the</strong> music of <strong>the</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!