who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ... who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

10.07.2015 Views

388europaischen musik des spaten Mittelalters und der fruhen Renaissance anhand bildlicher,musiktheoretischer und musikalischer Quellen. 14. Rudolf Brandl*. “Der Bordun und seine Entwiclkung inder Volksmusik des Dodekanes anhand eigener Feldaufnahmen 1965-1971.” 15. Jan Steszewski*. “DerBordun und die bordun-artigen Erscheinungen in der polnischen Volksmusik.” 16. Franz Eibner. “Bordun –tonalitat – Auskomponierung. Zum innermusikalischen sinngehalt bordunieranden Musizierens.1984, Georgia. The 1984 conference “Problems of Folk Polyphony” atTbilisi State Conservatory was the first of the series of biannual conferences ontraditional polyphony. The conference was held in the Small Concert Hall of theConservatory from 11 th October to 14 th October. Participants attended the scholarlysessions in the morning and afternoon, and attended concerts of Georgian traditionalpolyphony specially organized for participants of the conference. Scholars from differentrepublics of the USSR (currently many of them are independent states) delivered papersat the conference. Short versions of the papers were published as a separate collection in1985 (Jordania, 1985), and several papers were added. Papers that were added later (andwere not delivered at the 1984 conference) are marked with *.1. Izaly Zemtsovsky, Russia, Leningrad. “Phenomenon of polyphony in music of oral tradition.” 2.Moisei Boroda, Georgia, Tbilisi. “Some principles of rhythmic development in melodic of Georgianpolyphonic songs.” 3. Villis Bendorf, Latvia, Riga. “Types of Latvian polyphony and its possible externallinks.” 4. Valerian Magradze, Georgia, Tbilisi. ”Reconstruction of Meskhetian polyphonic songs.” 5. IngaBakhtadze, Georgia, Tbilisi. “Problem of origins of national polyphony on early Christian period.” 6. MziaIashvili, Georgia, Tbilisi. “Two kinds of old Georgian professional music and the successiveness of thetradition of polyphonic singing.” 7. Ketevan Baiashvili. Georgia, Tbilisi. “Available information ofGeorgian traditional polyphony.” 8. Joseph Jordania, Georgia. Tbilisi. “On the emergence of drone three-functionality in polyphonic songs of Samegrelo.” 13. Nailia Almeeva,part singing in Georgian traditional music.” 9. Otar Chidjavadze, Georgia, Tbilisi. “Medieval Georgianchants and Mediaeval professional polyphony.” 10. Evsevi Chokhonelidze, Georgia, Tbilisi. “Chords inGeorgian traditional music.” 11. Christopher Arakelov, Georgia, Tbilisi. “Multi-scale phenomenon inGeorgian polyphonic songs (on Kartli, Kakheti, Svaneti, Samegrelo materials).” 12. Tamaz Gabisonia,Georgia, Tbilisi. “HarmonicTatarstan, Kazan. “Traditional polyphony of the ‘Christened Tatars’ from the middle Volga region.” 14.Gulnara Gvarjaladze, Georgia, Tbilisi. “Aspects of rhythmic organization in Georgian traditional song.” 15.Nikolai Boiarkin, Mordva, Saransk. “Two- and three-part polyphonic style of Mordvinian traditional songsand instrumental tunes.” 16. Edisher Garakanidze, Georgia, Tbilisi. “Polyphony in Kartli. 17. NugzarJordania. Georgia, Tbilisi. “The role of the base part in Gurian traditional polyphony.” 18. VladimirGogotishvili, Georgia, Tbilisi. “Fifths diatonic scale system in west Georgian polyphonic songs.” 19. IvanVindgolts, Russia, Karaganda. “Sociofolkloristics: Principle of realization of polyphony in folkloregroups.” 20. Vitali Fedko*, Russia, Leningrad. “Realization of the idea of the “polyphony” in vocalensembles of Russian-Belarus border.” 21. Viacheslav Shchurov*, Russia, Moscow. “Main types ofRussian traditional polyphony.” 22. Galina Kutireva*, Russia, Moscow. “Polyphonic singing in westernBelarus Polesie.” 23. Nikolai Dorofeev*, Russia, Leningrad. “Polyphonic singing of “Semeiskie” [Russianreligious group living at the lake Baikal]. 24. Evgeni Pinchukov*. Russia, Sverdlovsk. “Harmonic and scaleoriginality of Flamenco style.” 25. Mariam Ositashvili*. Georgia, Tbilisi. “The system of “Oktoixos” in oldGeorgian professional singing.”1986, Georgia. The second international conference with the title “Problemsof folk polyphony” was held in the resort complex “House of Recreation and Creativityof Composers” in Borjomi, from 10 th to 15 th November. Scholarly sessions were held inthe mornings and afternoons. Concerts of Georgian traditional polyphonic songs werepresented by two ensembles from different regions of Georgia every evening. Extendedabstracts were published (Jordania, 1986). Here is the list of the scholars and their papersaccording to the conference program and published extended abstracts:1. Izaly Zemtsovsky, Russia, Leningrad. “Problems of Musical Dialogue: Antiphon anddiaphony.” 2. Ivan Vindgholtz. Russia, Karaganda. “Marius Scheider’s ‘History of Polyphony’ half acentury later”. 3. Fedor Arzamanov*. Russia, Moscow. “Some peculiarities of Chinese traditional

389polyphon y.” 4. Nailia Almeeva, Tatarstan, Kazan. “Heterophonic texture: the case of the analyses of thepolyphonic songs or Christened Tartars.” 5. Alma Kunanbaeva, Kazakhstan, Leningrad. “Hierarchy of thestable elements of Kazakh epic singing in the system of “voice-instrument.” 6. Oksana Nikitenko. Russia,Leningrad. “Creating polyphonic model in a musical culture.” 7. Evsevi Chokhonelidze. Georgia. Tbilisi.“On some problems of Georgian folk polyphony.” 8. Viktor Kartsovnik. Russia, Leningrad. “YuriKrizhanich on Byzantine polyphony.” 9. Mzia Iashvili. Georgia, Tbilisi. “Unity of contrasts [ertobaishekovlebisai] and the antiquity of Georgian tradition of polyphonic singing.” 10. Nino Pirtskhalava,Georgia, Tbilisi. "Georgian three-part polyphony and the musical-aesthetic thought of Ioanne Petritsi.” 11.Nikolai Kauffmann, Bulgaria, Sofia. “Traditional polyphony in Bulgarian professional music.” 12. ZinaidaMozheiko*. Belarus, Minsk. “Tradition of polyphonic singing in Belarus Polesie.” 13. Nikolai Boiarkin.Mordovia, Saransk. “On links between vocal and instrumental music of Mordvinians.” 14. ValerianMagradze, Georgia, Tbilisi. “On the method of the reconstruction of the polyphonic singing of Meskheti.”15. Nino Kalandadze, Georgia, Tbilisi. “Polyphonic lullabies.” 16. Nato Zumbadze, Georgia, Tbilisi. “Onpeculiarities of women’s polyphony in Georgia.” 17. Edisher Garakanidze, Georgia, Tbilisi.“Interrelationships between Acharo-Shavshetian, Gurian and Svan musical dialects of Georgian traditionalmusic.” 18. Anatoly Rakhaev. North Caucasia, Nalchik. “Problem of choral accompaniment “Ezhu” inBalkarian traditional singing.” 19. Tamara Blaeva, North Caucasia, Nalchik. “Peculiarities of thepolyphonic texture in Adighian traditional songs.” 20. Igor Macievsky, Russia, Leningrad. “Problem offorming of Instrumental Polyphony among East Slavs and Balts.” 21. Vaike Sarv, Estonia, Tallinn, Estonia.“Main types of polyphony in Setu traditional song.” 22. Urve Lippus, Estonia, Tallinn. “Two-part singingin older songs of south Estonia.” 23. Nugzar Jordania. Georgia, Tbilisi. “Form of Trio in a singing traditionof Western Georgia.” 24. Laima Burkshtaitene, Lithuania, Vilnius. “Problems of the emergence of the latepolypho nic style in northeastern Lithuania.” 25. Ketevan Nikoladze, Georgia, Tbilisi. “Double blowninstruments and the problem of vocal polyphony.” 26. Ketevan Baiashvili, Georgia, Tbilisi. “Problem ofassimilation of polyphonic traditions (on the example of Ertso-Tianeti).” 27. Khristofor Arakelov. Georgia,Tbilisi. Cadences in Georgia (Svan) polyphonic chral songs.” 28. Gulnara Gvardzhaladze. Georgia, Tbilisi.“Aspects of rthythm in Georgian polyphonic song.” 29. Tamaz Gabisonia. Georgia, Tbilisi. “Compositionalprinciples and types of Georgian traditional polyphony.” 30. Oscar Elschek, Slovakia, Bratislava.“Traditional polyphony in European musical cultures.” 31. Yulia Evdokimova*. Russia, Moscow. “Ontypology and cartography of European polyphonic regions.” 32. Todor Todorov*. Bulgaria, Sofia. Problemof polyphony in the research of Bulgarian ethomusicologists.” 33. Villis Bendorf, Latvia, Riga. “Onrelationship between Baltic and Balkan polyphonic traditions.” 34. Dunia Rihtman-Shotrich, Bosnia,Sarajevo. “Polyphonic forms in Bosnia and Herzegovina.” Radmila Petrovich, Serbia, Beograd. “Two-partsinging in Serbia.” 35. Anaid Bagdasarian, Armenia, Erevan. “Elements of polyphony in Armenianmonodic music.” 36. Oleg Gerasimov, Mari, Russia. Yoshkar-Ola. “Principle of establishing thepolyphonic texture in traditional Mari songs.” 37. T. Ignatieva, V. Nikiforova, Russia, Novosibirsk.“Peculiarities of traditional texture in Yakutian “Osuokai.” 38. Martin Boiko, Latvia, Riga. “Relicts ofSutartines in Latvia.” 39. Daiva Rachiunaite, Lithuania, Vilnius. “Forms of Lithuanian linear polyphony.”40. Elena Murzina, Ukraine, Kiev. “Polyphony as a dynamic phenomenon of the traditional musical cultureof the Ukraine.” 41. Tatiana Rudichenko, Russia, Rostov. “The role of traditional timbre in surviving thepolyphonic singing culture on river Don.” 42. Nadia Zhulanova, Russia, Perm. “Stylistic differences in thelocal traditions of vocal polyphony of the Komi-Permiaks.” 43. Nino Tsitsishvili, Georgia. Tbilisi. “OnSouth-Slavic – Georgian musical and ethnogenetic links.” 44. Joseph Jordania. Georgia, Tbilisi.“Polypho ny and ethno-genesis.”1988, Georgia. The third international conference with the title ”Problemsof folk polyphony” (the last one to be held in Borjomi), took place on October 15-22. Itwas a joint venture of the Tbilisi State Conservatory, Tbilisi State University, the Unionof Composers of Georgia, and the Georgian Choreographic Society. A further conferencewas planned for 1991, but the worsening political and economical situation, the civil warof 1991-1992, and the wars in Ossetia and Abkhazia made any follow-up conferenceimpossible for a decade. (Extended abstracts of the papers were published (Jordania,1988c). Here is the list of the scholars and their papers according to the conferenceprogram:

389polyphon y.” 4. Nailia Almeeva, Tatarstan, Kazan. “Heterophonic texture: <strong>the</strong> case of <strong>the</strong> analyses of <strong>the</strong>polyphonic songs or Christened Tartars.” 5. Alma Kunanbaeva, Kazakhstan, Leningrad. “Hierarchy of <strong>the</strong>stable elements of Kazakh epic singing in <strong>the</strong> system of “voice-instrument.” 6. Oksana Nikitenko. Russia,Leningrad. “Creating polyphonic model in a musical culture.” 7. Evsevi Chokhonelidze. Georgia. Tbilisi.“On some problems of Georgian folk polyphony.” 8. Viktor Kartsovnik. Russia, Leningrad. “YuriKrizhanich on Byzantine polyphony.” 9. Mzia Iashvili. Georgia, Tbilisi. “Unity of contrasts [ertobaishekovlebisai] and <strong>the</strong> antiquity of Georgian tradition of polyphonic singing.” 10. Nino Pirtskhalava,Georgia, Tbilisi. "Georgian three-part polyphony and <strong>the</strong> musical-aes<strong>the</strong>tic thought of Ioanne Petritsi.” 11.Nikolai Kauffmann, Bulgaria, Sofia. “Traditional polyphony in Bulgarian professional music.” 12. ZinaidaMozheiko*. Belarus, Minsk. “Tradition of polyphonic singing in Belarus Polesie.” 13. Nikolai Boiarkin.Mordovia, Saransk. “On links between vocal and instrumental music of Mordvinians.” 14. ValerianMagradze, Georgia, Tbilisi. “On <strong>the</strong> method of <strong>the</strong> reconstruction of <strong>the</strong> polyphonic singing of Meskheti.”15. Nino Kalandadze, Georgia, Tbilisi. “Polyphonic lullabies.” 16. Nato Zumbadze, Georgia, Tbilisi. “Onpeculiarities of women’s polyphony in Georgia.” 17. Edisher Garakanidze, Georgia, Tbilisi.“Interrelationships between Acharo-Shavshetian, Gurian and Svan musical dialects of Georgian traditionalmusic.” 18. Anatoly Rakhaev. North Caucasia, Nalchik. “Problem of choral accompaniment “Ezhu” inBalkarian traditional singing.” 19. Tamara Blaeva, North Caucasia, Nalchik. “Peculiarities of <strong>the</strong>polyphonic texture in Adighian traditional songs.” 20. Igor Macievsky, Russia, Leningrad. “Problem offorming of Instrumental Polyphony among East Slavs and Balts.” 21. Vaike Sarv, Estonia, Tallinn, Estonia.“Main types of polyphony in Setu traditional song.” 22. Urve Lippus, Estonia, Tallinn. “Two-part singingin older songs of south Estonia.” 23. Nugzar Jordania. Georgia, Tbilisi. “<strong>For</strong>m of Trio in a singing traditionof Western Georgia.” 24. Laima Burkshtaitene, Lithuania, Vilnius. “Problems of <strong>the</strong> emergence of <strong>the</strong> latepolypho nic style in nor<strong>the</strong>astern Lithuania.” 25. Ketevan Nikoladze, Georgia, Tbilisi. “Double blowninstruments and <strong>the</strong> problem of vocal polyphony.” 26. Ketevan Baiashvili, Georgia, Tbilisi. “Problem ofassimilation of polyphonic traditions (on <strong>the</strong> example of Ertso-Tianeti).” 27. Khristofor Arakelov. Georgia,Tbilisi. Cadences in Georgia (Svan) polyphonic chral songs.” 28. Gulnara Gvardzhaladze. Georgia, Tbilisi.“Aspects of rthythm in Georgian polyphonic song.” 29. Tamaz Gabisonia. Georgia, Tbilisi. “Compositionalprinciples and types of Georgian traditional polyphony.” 30. Oscar Elschek, Slovakia, Bratislava.“Traditional polyphony in European musical cultures.” 31. Yulia Evdokimova*. Russia, Moscow. “Ontypology and cartography of European polyphonic regions.” 32. Todor Todorov*. Bulgaria, Sofia. Problemof polyphony in <strong>the</strong> research of Bulgarian ethomusicologists.” 33. Villis Bendorf, Latvia, Riga. “Onrelationship between Baltic and Balkan polyphonic traditions.” 34. Dunia Rihtman-Shotrich, Bosnia,Sarajevo. “Polyphonic forms in Bosnia and Herzegovina.” Radmila Petrovich, Serbia, Beograd. “Two-partsinging in Serbia.” 35. Anaid Bagdasarian, Armenia, Erevan. “Elements of polyphony in Armenianmonodic music.” 36. Oleg Gerasimov, Mari, Russia. Yoshkar-Ola. “Principle of establishing <strong>the</strong>polyphonic texture in traditional Mari songs.” 37. T. Ignatieva, V. Nikiforova, Russia, Novosibirsk.“Peculiarities of traditional texture in Yakutian “Osuokai.” 38. Martin Boiko, Latvia, Riga. “Relicts ofSutartines in Latvia.” 39. Daiva Rachiunaite, Lithuania, Vilnius. “<strong>For</strong>ms of Lithuanian linear polyphony.”40. Elena Murzina, Ukraine, Kiev. “Polyphony as a dynamic phenomenon of <strong>the</strong> traditional musical cultureof <strong>the</strong> Ukraine.” 41. Tatiana Rudichenko, Russia, Rostov. “The role of traditional timbre in surviving <strong>the</strong>polyphonic singing culture on river Don.” 42. Nadia Zhulanova, Russia, Perm. “Stylistic differences in <strong>the</strong>local traditions of vocal polyphony of <strong>the</strong> Komi-Permiaks.” 43. Nino Tsitsishvili, Georgia. Tbilisi. “OnSouth-Slavic – Georgian musical and ethnogenetic links.” 44. Joseph Jordania. Georgia, Tbilisi.“Polypho ny and ethno-genesis.”1988, Georgia. The third international conference with <strong>the</strong> title ”Problemsof folk polyphony” (<strong>the</strong> last one to be held in Borjomi), took place on October 15-22. Itwas a joint venture of <strong>the</strong> Tbilisi State Conservatory, Tbilisi State University, <strong>the</strong> Unionof Composers of Georgia, and <strong>the</strong> Georgian Choreographic Society. A fur<strong>the</strong>r conferencewas planned for 1991, but <strong>the</strong> worsening political and economical situation, <strong>the</strong> civil warof 1991-1992, and <strong>the</strong> wars in Ossetia and Abkhazia made any follow-up conferenceimpossible for a decade. (Extended abstracts of <strong>the</strong> papers were published (Jordania,1988c). Here is <strong>the</strong> list of <strong>the</strong> scholars and <strong>the</strong>ir papers according to <strong>the</strong> conferenceprogram:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!