10.07.2015 Views

who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

338spontaneous pant-hoots). This also suggests that inquiring pant-hootsare in fact statements, not <strong>question</strong>s;(3) Most importantly, enculturated chimpanzees do not use interrogativesin laboratories where <strong>the</strong>y are successfully taught complex forms ofcommunication. Although in laboratories <strong>the</strong>y demonstrate incrediblecognitive abilities, much beyond <strong>the</strong> level of <strong>the</strong>ir free-rangingrelatives, and although <strong>the</strong>y are familiar with interrogative sentences,still <strong>the</strong>y do seem not ask <strong>question</strong>s. It seems very unlikely thatchimpanzees lose <strong>the</strong> ability to ask <strong>question</strong>s in captivity.Questioning-like behavior has been suggested in o<strong>the</strong>r primates. David Symmesand Maxeen Biben suggest three criteria to establish <strong>the</strong> presence of a conversationamong animals: (1) turn taking, (2) directionality of change in acoustic structure, and (3)bidirectionality of information transfer (Todt et all., 1988: vii; Symmes & Biben, 1988:123-32). According to <strong>the</strong> research of Symmes and Biben, squirrel monkeys’ vocalexchange can be characterized as conversations. Regarding <strong>the</strong> ability of squirrelmonkeys to ask <strong>question</strong>s, Symmes and Biben suggested, “animals are seekinginformation by <strong>question</strong>ing and receiving information from answers” (Symmes & Biben1988:131). I understand it is not easy to be sure what <strong>the</strong> squirrel monkey are “talking”about, or whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y really ask each o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>question</strong>s, but it seems unlikely to me thatmonkeys can ask <strong>question</strong>s when more cognitively developed apes do not seem topossess this ability. Bateson and Trevarthan coined a special term “proto-conversation”for <strong>the</strong> early forms of communicative interaction (Bateson, 1975; Trevarthan, 1979)Therefore, <strong>the</strong> foregoing evidence suggests that• Our closest living relatives understand human <strong>question</strong>s and can respondaccordingly on a level of a human child roughly about 2.5 years old (Savage-Rumbaugh,1994);• Chimpanzees in <strong>the</strong> wild have vocalization that has elements of <strong>question</strong>ingbehavior (enquiry about <strong>the</strong> whereabouts of o<strong>the</strong>r members of <strong>the</strong> group, and mostimportantly – <strong>the</strong> human-like terminal rising <strong>question</strong> intonation);• According to published results, apes were not able to learn how to ask <strong>question</strong>sin <strong>the</strong> experiments, despite <strong>the</strong>ir widely known curiosity.• The reason for this inability could be <strong>the</strong> genetic limitations of <strong>the</strong> apes’brain. These limitations do not allow for <strong>the</strong> mental ability from which apes would learn<strong>question</strong>ing, or to inquire about <strong>the</strong> informational state of o<strong>the</strong>r individuals.• Where did <strong>the</strong> phenomenon of <strong>question</strong>s camefrom – are <strong>the</strong>re any evolutionary prerequisites for <strong>the</strong><strong>question</strong>ing behavior?Yes, <strong>the</strong>re are at least two of <strong>the</strong>m. First of all, an evolutionary prerequisite of <strong>the</strong><strong>question</strong> phenomenon is curiosity. I think it is safe to declare that a <strong>question</strong> without

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!