who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...
who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ... who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...
332distant ancestors. So the question about two individuals, one of whom is able to askquestions and the other who is unable to ask questions, must be understood in the contextof hominid and human evolution: what advantage would the first “questioning hominid”have when the ability of asking questions emerged at some point in human or hominidprehistory? The advantages seem to me so obvious and so important that I think it wouldbe fitting to declare that with the emergence of questioning behavior the evolution ofour mental abilities made a crucial turn towards human intelligence.Maybe the most important consequence for each “questioning” individual is thatthe emergence of the question phenomenon turned the hominid brain into an open, selfdevelopingsystem. We self develop cognitively by asking questions and looking for theanswers. A child develops by asking an array of questions, and the “runaway brain”evolution (Wills, 1993) begins with questions -- both in phylogeny and ontogeny.• What evolutionary advantage could the ability ofasking questions have given to human groups?Although we have just discussed the advantages that the new ability to askquestions would give to the first human, the true winner of the new ability of askingquestions must have been the whole group, the first human society. This advantage musthave been particularly obvious when the whole group had the mental ability to askquestions.If you imagine two groups of humans or hominids, one asking questions of eachother within the group, and the other group members unable to ask questions of eachother, the difference will be so obvious and big that it would be correct to speak in thefirst case about group of humans, and in the second case about hominids, or pre-humans.The ability of asking questions drastically changes the intellectual capacity and behaviorof the group.The evolutionary significance of the ability to ask questions first of all was arevolutionary enhancement of the cognitive ability of a whole group of individuals, bycoordinating their cognitive abilities. Suddenly the members of the first human societystarted asking each other questions, more actively sharing information and discussingproblems. With the appearance of the ability to ask questions hominid communicationof exchanging information turned into a human dialogical communication. This newability to formulate and ask questions created totally new phenomena -- group cognitionand mental cooperation. The unique human ability of mental cooperation pushed ourancestors on to a completely new stage of cognitive development, previously unknown tothe animal kingdom. Therefore, the importance of the new ability to ask questions wasnot only an increased cognitive ability of each hominid individual, but also arevolutionary new level of group cognition and mental cooperation. We can concludethat, with the emergence of the ability of asking questions, each member of our ancestors’society became smarter, but the combination of these smart individuals, put together as adiscussing group, was much bigger than the simple sum of several smart individuals. Isuggest that our ancestors passed a cognitive threshold after they started askingquestions.
333With the emergence of the ability to ask questions human language gained the lastof three main language functions - declarations, commands and questions (about thesethree functions of language see de Laguna, 1963 [1927]). G. Revesz wrote about threefunctions of language as well: imperative, indicative and interrogative (Revesz, 1956).We can look at the entire evolution of the human species and the development ofhuman society and civilization from the point of view of information exchange meansavailable in a society. We could distinguish several most important changes in theevolution of human information exchange. The ability to ask questions was the first andtruly revolutionary change in this chain of technologies to exchange information viadirect communication. Human dialogical language, intelligence, mental cooperation and aself-developing brain emerged together with the ability to ask questions. We can even saythat all the following revolutionary changes in information exchange were just thetechnical means of enhancing our ability and desire to exchange information. After thiswe never stopped inventing different ways of asking each other questions. So we startedasking questions using speech (do not forget – we started asking questions before theadvance of articulated speech!), later – written language, handwritten and publishedbooks, telephone, radio, TV and the Internet. Throughout our history as a species we havebeen asking questions of each other, of other generations, and even of people fromdifferent countries and continents we will never know, apart from a small moment ofshared human behavior when we asked for the information that we needed and they knewthe answer.• So, Who asked the first question:or “Interrogo Ergo Cogito”Here we are, answering the question of questions, posed in the title of this book. Itis a pity we will never know the name of the first individual who asked the first questionto mark the turning point in the long process of human evolution, but there is anotherquite precise way to answer this question:The first question was asked by the first human being.It does not matter whether it was a woman or man. What matters is the hugeadvantage and the instant gratification that the ability of asking questions would give tothe first questioning human being. Most likely this was a result of genetic mutation,although the development of ape and then hominid mental ability was heading towardsthis crucial point, so the appearance of the “questioning gene” must have been arelatively smooth transaction. Hominid group-based survival strategy on the ground,everyday co-operational activity, an increased load of communication and more complexsocial politics within the bigger groups was leading towards this revolutionary change incommunication. The advantage that the first questioning human gained from this newability must have been so big that with every new generation the number of questioninghumans (transmitted genetically from the first human individual) must have increasedlike a bushfire.Was the ability to ask questions initially used in everyday referentialcommunication or in ritual singing with possibly a referential text? I have already
- Page 281 and 282: 281• Performance style. Arguably
- Page 283 and 284: 283C-major key, G major chord could
- Page 285 and 286: 285Ending of the songs on non-tonic
- Page 287 and 288: 287Fig. 16. Medieval West Georgian
- Page 289 and 290: 289phenomenon in the history of the
- Page 291 and 292: 291North America (according to the
- Page 293 and 294: 293Part 3Singing, Questioning, Thin
- Page 295 and 296: 295European and Middle Eastern mono
- Page 297 and 298: 297This characteristic raises one s
- Page 299 and 300: 299is not only a linguistic problem
- Page 301 and 302: 301with all their communicative ski
- Page 303 and 304: 303cooperative (and not competitive
- Page 305 and 306: 305group and groom each other, they
- Page 307 and 308: 307hungry lion. And here comes anot
- Page 309 and 310: 309“attacking power” of the “
- Page 311 and 312: 311Singing in Peaceful Times:Toward
- Page 313 and 314: 313he changed his view and linked t
- Page 315 and 316: 315Gestural Theory of Language Orig
- Page 317 and 318: 317among hominids. The situation of
- Page 319 and 320: 319whistle with a whistle. The inte
- Page 321 and 322: 321referential function. In contemp
- Page 323 and 324: 323mental abilities, but even music
- Page 325 and 326: 325articulated elements, where the
- Page 327 and 328: 327development experts would unanim
- Page 329 and 330: 329years after 1996, if I see a new
- Page 331: 331• Why do we ask questions?This
- Page 335 and 336: 335apes’ and humans’ mental abi
- Page 337 and 338: 337The fascinating fact about the T
- Page 339 and 340: 339curiosity cannot exist, although
- Page 341 and 342: 341• Question intonation is argua
- Page 343 and 344: 343A few cases of “wolf children
- Page 345 and 346: 345(2) Children under two and pidgi
- Page 347 and 348: 347Let’s Talk: Origin of SpeechTh
- Page 349 and 350: 349article concluded with the sugge
- Page 351 and 352: 351are disposed to accept such a vi
- Page 353 and 354: 353articulated speech among the anc
- Page 355 and 356: 355speech (possibly in conjunction
- Page 357 and 358: 357function, while in the sub-Sahar
- Page 359 and 360: 359acquired, it is one of the most
- Page 361 and 362: 361millennia. So the historical dyn
- Page 363 and 364: 363of stuttering was mostly margina
- Page 365 and 366: 365when I reminded her of our conve
- Page 367 and 368: 367• A comparison of the stutteri
- Page 369 and 370: 369predisposition towards stutterin
- Page 371 and 372: 371There are some well-researched p
- Page 373 and 374: 373Developmental dyslexiaStuttering
- Page 375 and 376: 375mastery or correct usage of soun
- Page 377 and 378: 377• As the process of the declin
- Page 379 and 380: 379major African ground predators (
- Page 381 and 382: 381PostScript:Moral and ethics issu
332distant ancestors. So <strong>the</strong> <strong>question</strong> about two individuals, one of <strong>who</strong>m is able to ask<strong>question</strong>s and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>who</strong> is unable to ask <strong>question</strong>s, must be understood in <strong>the</strong> contextof hominid and human evolution: what advantage would <strong>the</strong> <strong>first</strong> “<strong>question</strong>ing hominid”have when <strong>the</strong> ability of asking <strong>question</strong>s emerged at some point in human or hominidprehistory? The advantages seem to me so obvious and so important that I think it wouldbe fitting to declare that with <strong>the</strong> emergence of <strong>question</strong>ing behavior <strong>the</strong> evolution ofour mental abilities made a crucial turn towards human intelligence.Maybe <strong>the</strong> most important consequence for each “<strong>question</strong>ing” individual is that<strong>the</strong> emergence of <strong>the</strong> <strong>question</strong> phenomenon turned <strong>the</strong> hominid brain into an open, selfdevelopingsystem. We self develop cognitively by asking <strong>question</strong>s and looking for <strong>the</strong>answers. A child develops by asking an array of <strong>question</strong>s, and <strong>the</strong> “runaway brain”evolution (Wills, 1993) begins with <strong>question</strong>s -- both in phylogeny and ontogeny.• What evolutionary advantage could <strong>the</strong> ability ofasking <strong>question</strong>s have given to human groups?Although we have just discussed <strong>the</strong> advantages that <strong>the</strong> new ability to ask<strong>question</strong>s would give to <strong>the</strong> <strong>first</strong> human, <strong>the</strong> true winner of <strong>the</strong> new ability of asking<strong>question</strong>s must have been <strong>the</strong> <strong>who</strong>le group, <strong>the</strong> <strong>first</strong> human society. This advantage musthave been particularly obvious when <strong>the</strong> <strong>who</strong>le group had <strong>the</strong> mental ability to ask<strong>question</strong>s.If you imagine two groups of humans or hominids, one asking <strong>question</strong>s of eacho<strong>the</strong>r within <strong>the</strong> group, and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r group members unable to ask <strong>question</strong>s of eacho<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> difference will be so obvious and big that it would be correct to speak in <strong>the</strong><strong>first</strong> case about group of humans, and in <strong>the</strong> second case about hominids, or pre-humans.The ability of asking <strong>question</strong>s drastically changes <strong>the</strong> intellectual capacity and behaviorof <strong>the</strong> group.The evolutionary significance of <strong>the</strong> ability to ask <strong>question</strong>s <strong>first</strong> of all was arevolutionary enhancement of <strong>the</strong> cognitive ability of a <strong>who</strong>le group of individuals, bycoordinating <strong>the</strong>ir cognitive abilities. Suddenly <strong>the</strong> members of <strong>the</strong> <strong>first</strong> human societystarted asking each o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>question</strong>s, more actively sharing information and discussingproblems. With <strong>the</strong> appearance of <strong>the</strong> ability to ask <strong>question</strong>s hominid communicationof exchanging information turned into a human dialogical communication. This newability to formulate and ask <strong>question</strong>s created totally new phenomena -- group cognitionand mental cooperation. The unique human ability of mental cooperation pushed ourancestors on to a completely new stage of cognitive development, previously unknown to<strong>the</strong> animal kingdom. Therefore, <strong>the</strong> importance of <strong>the</strong> new ability to ask <strong>question</strong>s wasnot only an increased cognitive ability of each hominid individual, but also arevolutionary new level of group cognition and mental cooperation. We can concludethat, with <strong>the</strong> emergence of <strong>the</strong> ability of asking <strong>question</strong>s, each member of our ancestors’society became smarter, but <strong>the</strong> combination of <strong>the</strong>se smart individuals, put toge<strong>the</strong>r as adiscussing group, was much bigger than <strong>the</strong> simple sum of several smart individuals. Isuggest that our ancestors passed a cognitive threshold after <strong>the</strong>y started asking<strong>question</strong>s.