who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ... who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

10.07.2015 Views

320communication, but the use of a purely pitch-based whistle language in a fewcontemporary human societies is an important fact that should not be overlooked.• “Language” of African drums(or “African Talking Drums”) is another instance of the use of a purely pitchcomponent for communication. Unlike whistling, which could have been present in ourdistant hominid ancestors, the drum language of sub-Saharan Africans could be arelatively late (compared to singing of whistling) phenomenon. The use of musicalinstrument points to this. Despite this, the existence of drum languages also proves thatpitch-only based communication can function in human society. A very interesting detailof African Talking Drums” is that different African tribes, who speak different languages,often u se a more universal Drum Language, which sometimes employs the earlier,already extinct words and expressions of the local languages (Crystal, 1987:401).It is pity that in many ways the innovative and insightful book of Steven Mithen“Singing Neanderthal” does not even mention either “whistle languages”, or “AfricanTalking Drums” which could further promote his idea of the importance of music (pitchbasedcommunication) in the evolution of human language. The reason for this silencecould be the following: Mithen, despite his genuine efforts to promote the idea of theimportance of music in the evolution of human language, sees music only as a “nonreferentialsystem of communication” (Mithen, 2005:22), without even discussing thereferential potential of pitch-based communication.• Tone languagesalso demonstrate the importance of the tone (pitch-based) component in humanlanguages. If whistle and drum languages are present only in a limited number of regionsof the world, tone languages constitute in fact the majority of world languages. Webriefly discussed the nature of tone languages in the first part of this book in relation ofsub-African parallel polyphony. The tone component is very important for both themorphology and the syntax. The lexical use of tone is widespread in all tone languages –in South-East Asian and African tone languages – and the grammatical use of tones, suchas singular and plural forms and present and past tenses is “typical of many languages ofAfrica” (Cruttenden, 1986:9).Speaking about the use of tone in languages, there is hardly a language in theworld that does not make any use of tone and intonation. Even the speakers of English, anon-tone language, use different intonations to form interrogatives in statements ineveryday speech (like the difference between “Let’s go” and “Let’s go?”).It is very important to note that in tone languages, as well as in other nonarticulatedmeans of pitch communication (whistle and drum languages) pitch contourhas nothing to do with the emotional content usually attributed to music andsinging. Here the pitch element assists articulation in conveying arbitrarily designedprecise meanings. An emotional element of tone is also present in tone languages, but itis independent of the lexical and grammatical meanings. So, regarding the use of tonesin tone languages, we may say that pitch was employed as a double-component system,overlaid on each other: (1) the first component has a referential lexical (and sometimesgrammatical) function, and (2) the second component has a general-emotional, non-

321referential function. In contemporary tone languages both functions of pitch modulationare clear, and they are overlaid on each other in a flow of speech.It seems that during the last major evolutionary change of human communication,when so-called “fully articulated language” came into existence, articulated speech didnot fully replace the older pitch language. In some regions speech replaced the pitchlanguage’s lexical and grammatical functions. In other regions the lexical and evengrammatical functions of pitch language were preserved. This is the case in contemporarytone languages. Therefore it would be more appropriate to talk about the “partialreplacement” of the ancient pitch languages. There is no language in the world that doesnot ma ke use of tone (prosodic elements), and in tone languages many more instances ofthe referential use of the ancient pitch element are preserved.• Pitch language: The first Dead Language inHuman HistoryThe statement of Steven Pinker, that “even a plot as simple as ‘Boy meets girl,boy loses girl’ cannot be narrated by a sequence of tones in any musical idiom” does nottell us the whole truth. In the example of whistle and drum languages we can see thatpitch contour can convey meaning precise enough to enable quite complex commercialagreements to made between two parties. Despite this possibility, today pitch-basedlanguage is used only as a marginal means of communication, mostly for communicatingover big distances. Readers might remember Karl Stumpf’s interest in pitch-basedcommunication over long distances from the brief survey of different ideas on the originsof music earlier in this part of the book. This need in referential pitch communication wasmostly lost after the much more efficient medium – speech - entered the scene, so unlesswe need to communicate over big distances in the mountains of Central America or theAfrican savannah, we communicate with speech.Our Australopithecine ancestors were roaming the African savanna during thelongest period of our prehistory, when time was passing in millions of years. During thisperiod our ancestors learned to survive without the safety of tree branches, sharing theground with major African predators. We have already discussed the possible survivalimportance of loud singing and shouting displays, magnified by the precise rhythmicstomping of a whole collective of hominids. The impressive “lion dance”, very effectivefor defence (and even attack to obtain carcasses), was more an ancestor of future humanmusic than a language. The language of more “peaceful” everyday communication musthave been quite different, although still mostly based on the pitch element (modulationsof a fundamental frequency).This early system of communication I will be mentioning with a term “pitchlanguage”. Pitch language is a referential system of communication, basedpredominantly on pitch modulations (See also Fonagy, 1981). Freedom from limbiccontrol and cultural learning during the early years were its other characteristics.Increasing data about the freedom from limbic control of primate vocalizations suggestthat both these featurescould have been present among our ancestors before theemergence of bipedal Australopithecines. At least at the stage of Australopithecine these

320communication, but <strong>the</strong> use of a purely pitch-based whistle language in a fewcontemporary human societies is an important fact that should not be overlooked.• “Language” of African drums(or “African Talking Drums”) is ano<strong>the</strong>r instance of <strong>the</strong> use of a purely pitchcomponent for communication. Unlike whistling, which could have been present in ourdistant hominid ancestors, <strong>the</strong> drum language of sub-Saharan Africans could be arelatively late (compared to singing of whistling) phenomenon. The use of musicalinstrument points to this. Despite this, <strong>the</strong> existence of drum languages also proves thatpitch-only based communication can function in human society. A very interesting detailof African Talking Drums” is that different African tribes, <strong>who</strong> speak different languages,often u se a more universal Drum Language, which sometimes employs <strong>the</strong> earlier,already extinct words and expressions of <strong>the</strong> local languages (Crystal, 1987:401).It is pity that in many ways <strong>the</strong> innovative and insightful book of Steven Mi<strong>the</strong>n“Singing Neanderthal” does not even mention ei<strong>the</strong>r “whistle languages”, or “AfricanTalking Drums” which could fur<strong>the</strong>r promote his idea of <strong>the</strong> importance of music (pitchbasedcommunication) in <strong>the</strong> evolution of human language. The reason for this silencecould be <strong>the</strong> following: Mi<strong>the</strong>n, despite his genuine efforts to promote <strong>the</strong> idea of <strong>the</strong>importance of music in <strong>the</strong> evolution of human language, sees music only as a “nonreferentialsystem of communication” (Mi<strong>the</strong>n, 2005:22), without even discussing <strong>the</strong>referential potential of pitch-based communication.• Tone languagesalso demonstrate <strong>the</strong> importance of <strong>the</strong> tone (pitch-based) component in humanlanguages. If whistle and drum languages are present only in a limited number of regionsof <strong>the</strong> world, tone languages constitute in fact <strong>the</strong> majority of world languages. Webriefly discussed <strong>the</strong> nature of tone languages in <strong>the</strong> <strong>first</strong> part of this book in relation ofsub-African parallel polyphony. The tone component is very important for both <strong>the</strong>morphology and <strong>the</strong> syntax. The lexical use of tone is widespread in all tone languages –in South-East Asian and African tone languages – and <strong>the</strong> grammatical use of tones, suchas singular and plural forms and present and past tenses is “typical of many languages ofAfrica” (Cruttenden, 1986:9).Speaking about <strong>the</strong> use of tone in languages, <strong>the</strong>re is hardly a language in <strong>the</strong>world that does not make any use of tone and intonation. Even <strong>the</strong> speakers of English, anon-tone language, use different intonations to form interrogatives in statements ineveryday speech (like <strong>the</strong> difference between “Let’s go” and “Let’s go?”).It is very important to note that in tone languages, as well as in o<strong>the</strong>r nonarticulatedmeans of pitch communication (whistle and drum languages) pitch contourhas nothing to do with <strong>the</strong> emotional content usually attributed to music andsinging. Here <strong>the</strong> pitch element assists articulation in conveying arbitrarily designedprecise meanings. An emotional element of tone is also present in tone languages, but itis independent of <strong>the</strong> lexical and grammatical meanings. So, regarding <strong>the</strong> use of tonesin tone languages, we may say that pitch was employed as a double-component system,overlaid on each o<strong>the</strong>r: (1) <strong>the</strong> <strong>first</strong> component has a referential lexical (and sometimesgrammatical) function, and (2) <strong>the</strong> second component has a general-emotional, non-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!