who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...
who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ... who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...
320communication, but the use of a purely pitch-based whistle language in a fewcontemporary human societies is an important fact that should not be overlooked.• “Language” of African drums(or “African Talking Drums”) is another instance of the use of a purely pitchcomponent for communication. Unlike whistling, which could have been present in ourdistant hominid ancestors, the drum language of sub-Saharan Africans could be arelatively late (compared to singing of whistling) phenomenon. The use of musicalinstrument points to this. Despite this, the existence of drum languages also proves thatpitch-only based communication can function in human society. A very interesting detailof African Talking Drums” is that different African tribes, who speak different languages,often u se a more universal Drum Language, which sometimes employs the earlier,already extinct words and expressions of the local languages (Crystal, 1987:401).It is pity that in many ways the innovative and insightful book of Steven Mithen“Singing Neanderthal” does not even mention either “whistle languages”, or “AfricanTalking Drums” which could further promote his idea of the importance of music (pitchbasedcommunication) in the evolution of human language. The reason for this silencecould be the following: Mithen, despite his genuine efforts to promote the idea of theimportance of music in the evolution of human language, sees music only as a “nonreferentialsystem of communication” (Mithen, 2005:22), without even discussing thereferential potential of pitch-based communication.• Tone languagesalso demonstrate the importance of the tone (pitch-based) component in humanlanguages. If whistle and drum languages are present only in a limited number of regionsof the world, tone languages constitute in fact the majority of world languages. Webriefly discussed the nature of tone languages in the first part of this book in relation ofsub-African parallel polyphony. The tone component is very important for both themorphology and the syntax. The lexical use of tone is widespread in all tone languages –in South-East Asian and African tone languages – and the grammatical use of tones, suchas singular and plural forms and present and past tenses is “typical of many languages ofAfrica” (Cruttenden, 1986:9).Speaking about the use of tone in languages, there is hardly a language in theworld that does not make any use of tone and intonation. Even the speakers of English, anon-tone language, use different intonations to form interrogatives in statements ineveryday speech (like the difference between “Let’s go” and “Let’s go?”).It is very important to note that in tone languages, as well as in other nonarticulatedmeans of pitch communication (whistle and drum languages) pitch contourhas nothing to do with the emotional content usually attributed to music andsinging. Here the pitch element assists articulation in conveying arbitrarily designedprecise meanings. An emotional element of tone is also present in tone languages, but itis independent of the lexical and grammatical meanings. So, regarding the use of tonesin tone languages, we may say that pitch was employed as a double-component system,overlaid on each other: (1) the first component has a referential lexical (and sometimesgrammatical) function, and (2) the second component has a general-emotional, non-
321referential function. In contemporary tone languages both functions of pitch modulationare clear, and they are overlaid on each other in a flow of speech.It seems that during the last major evolutionary change of human communication,when so-called “fully articulated language” came into existence, articulated speech didnot fully replace the older pitch language. In some regions speech replaced the pitchlanguage’s lexical and grammatical functions. In other regions the lexical and evengrammatical functions of pitch language were preserved. This is the case in contemporarytone languages. Therefore it would be more appropriate to talk about the “partialreplacement” of the ancient pitch languages. There is no language in the world that doesnot ma ke use of tone (prosodic elements), and in tone languages many more instances ofthe referential use of the ancient pitch element are preserved.• Pitch language: The first Dead Language inHuman HistoryThe statement of Steven Pinker, that “even a plot as simple as ‘Boy meets girl,boy loses girl’ cannot be narrated by a sequence of tones in any musical idiom” does nottell us the whole truth. In the example of whistle and drum languages we can see thatpitch contour can convey meaning precise enough to enable quite complex commercialagreements to made between two parties. Despite this possibility, today pitch-basedlanguage is used only as a marginal means of communication, mostly for communicatingover big distances. Readers might remember Karl Stumpf’s interest in pitch-basedcommunication over long distances from the brief survey of different ideas on the originsof music earlier in this part of the book. This need in referential pitch communication wasmostly lost after the much more efficient medium – speech - entered the scene, so unlesswe need to communicate over big distances in the mountains of Central America or theAfrican savannah, we communicate with speech.Our Australopithecine ancestors were roaming the African savanna during thelongest period of our prehistory, when time was passing in millions of years. During thisperiod our ancestors learned to survive without the safety of tree branches, sharing theground with major African predators. We have already discussed the possible survivalimportance of loud singing and shouting displays, magnified by the precise rhythmicstomping of a whole collective of hominids. The impressive “lion dance”, very effectivefor defence (and even attack to obtain carcasses), was more an ancestor of future humanmusic than a language. The language of more “peaceful” everyday communication musthave been quite different, although still mostly based on the pitch element (modulationsof a fundamental frequency).This early system of communication I will be mentioning with a term “pitchlanguage”. Pitch language is a referential system of communication, basedpredominantly on pitch modulations (See also Fonagy, 1981). Freedom from limbiccontrol and cultural learning during the early years were its other characteristics.Increasing data about the freedom from limbic control of primate vocalizations suggestthat both these featurescould have been present among our ancestors before theemergence of bipedal Australopithecines. At least at the stage of Australopithecine these
- Page 269 and 270: 269“Music iconography can reveal
- Page 271 and 272: 271specific double flute made from
- Page 273 and 274: 273Case Study #14Polynesian Polypho
- Page 275 and 276: 275complexity plus precise enunciat
- Page 277 and 278: 277Case Study #15The Beatles: Ancie
- Page 279 and 280: 279Acknowledging the crucial differ
- Page 281 and 282: 281• Performance style. Arguably
- Page 283 and 284: 283C-major key, G major chord could
- Page 285 and 286: 285Ending of the songs on non-tonic
- Page 287 and 288: 287Fig. 16. Medieval West Georgian
- Page 289 and 290: 289phenomenon in the history of the
- Page 291 and 292: 291North America (according to the
- Page 293 and 294: 293Part 3Singing, Questioning, Thin
- Page 295 and 296: 295European and Middle Eastern mono
- Page 297 and 298: 297This characteristic raises one s
- Page 299 and 300: 299is not only a linguistic problem
- Page 301 and 302: 301with all their communicative ski
- Page 303 and 304: 303cooperative (and not competitive
- Page 305 and 306: 305group and groom each other, they
- Page 307 and 308: 307hungry lion. And here comes anot
- Page 309 and 310: 309“attacking power” of the “
- Page 311 and 312: 311Singing in Peaceful Times:Toward
- Page 313 and 314: 313he changed his view and linked t
- Page 315 and 316: 315Gestural Theory of Language Orig
- Page 317 and 318: 317among hominids. The situation of
- Page 319: 319whistle with a whistle. The inte
- Page 323 and 324: 323mental abilities, but even music
- Page 325 and 326: 325articulated elements, where the
- Page 327 and 328: 327development experts would unanim
- Page 329 and 330: 329years after 1996, if I see a new
- Page 331 and 332: 331• Why do we ask questions?This
- Page 333 and 334: 333With the emergence of the abilit
- Page 335 and 336: 335apes’ and humans’ mental abi
- Page 337 and 338: 337The fascinating fact about the T
- Page 339 and 340: 339curiosity cannot exist, although
- Page 341 and 342: 341• Question intonation is argua
- Page 343 and 344: 343A few cases of “wolf children
- Page 345 and 346: 345(2) Children under two and pidgi
- Page 347 and 348: 347Let’s Talk: Origin of SpeechTh
- Page 349 and 350: 349article concluded with the sugge
- Page 351 and 352: 351are disposed to accept such a vi
- Page 353 and 354: 353articulated speech among the anc
- Page 355 and 356: 355speech (possibly in conjunction
- Page 357 and 358: 357function, while in the sub-Sahar
- Page 359 and 360: 359acquired, it is one of the most
- Page 361 and 362: 361millennia. So the historical dyn
- Page 363 and 364: 363of stuttering was mostly margina
- Page 365 and 366: 365when I reminded her of our conve
- Page 367 and 368: 367• A comparison of the stutteri
- Page 369 and 370: 369predisposition towards stutterin
320communication, but <strong>the</strong> use of a purely pitch-based whistle language in a fewcontemporary human societies is an important fact that should not be overlooked.• “Language” of African drums(or “African Talking Drums”) is ano<strong>the</strong>r instance of <strong>the</strong> use of a purely pitchcomponent for communication. Unlike whistling, which could have been present in ourdistant hominid ancestors, <strong>the</strong> drum language of sub-Saharan Africans could be arelatively late (compared to singing of whistling) phenomenon. The use of musicalinstrument points to this. Despite this, <strong>the</strong> existence of drum languages also proves thatpitch-only based communication can function in human society. A very interesting detailof African Talking Drums” is that different African tribes, <strong>who</strong> speak different languages,often u se a more universal Drum Language, which sometimes employs <strong>the</strong> earlier,already extinct words and expressions of <strong>the</strong> local languages (Crystal, 1987:401).It is pity that in many ways <strong>the</strong> innovative and insightful book of Steven Mi<strong>the</strong>n“Singing Neanderthal” does not even mention ei<strong>the</strong>r “whistle languages”, or “AfricanTalking Drums” which could fur<strong>the</strong>r promote his idea of <strong>the</strong> importance of music (pitchbasedcommunication) in <strong>the</strong> evolution of human language. The reason for this silencecould be <strong>the</strong> following: Mi<strong>the</strong>n, despite his genuine efforts to promote <strong>the</strong> idea of <strong>the</strong>importance of music in <strong>the</strong> evolution of human language, sees music only as a “nonreferentialsystem of communication” (Mi<strong>the</strong>n, 2005:22), without even discussing <strong>the</strong>referential potential of pitch-based communication.• Tone languagesalso demonstrate <strong>the</strong> importance of <strong>the</strong> tone (pitch-based) component in humanlanguages. If whistle and drum languages are present only in a limited number of regionsof <strong>the</strong> world, tone languages constitute in fact <strong>the</strong> majority of world languages. Webriefly discussed <strong>the</strong> nature of tone languages in <strong>the</strong> <strong>first</strong> part of this book in relation ofsub-African parallel polyphony. The tone component is very important for both <strong>the</strong>morphology and <strong>the</strong> syntax. The lexical use of tone is widespread in all tone languages –in South-East Asian and African tone languages – and <strong>the</strong> grammatical use of tones, suchas singular and plural forms and present and past tenses is “typical of many languages ofAfrica” (Cruttenden, 1986:9).Speaking about <strong>the</strong> use of tone in languages, <strong>the</strong>re is hardly a language in <strong>the</strong>world that does not make any use of tone and intonation. Even <strong>the</strong> speakers of English, anon-tone language, use different intonations to form interrogatives in statements ineveryday speech (like <strong>the</strong> difference between “Let’s go” and “Let’s go?”).It is very important to note that in tone languages, as well as in o<strong>the</strong>r nonarticulatedmeans of pitch communication (whistle and drum languages) pitch contourhas nothing to do with <strong>the</strong> emotional content usually attributed to music andsinging. Here <strong>the</strong> pitch element assists articulation in conveying arbitrarily designedprecise meanings. An emotional element of tone is also present in tone languages, but itis independent of <strong>the</strong> lexical and grammatical meanings. So, regarding <strong>the</strong> use of tonesin tone languages, we may say that pitch was employed as a double-component system,overlaid on each o<strong>the</strong>r: (1) <strong>the</strong> <strong>first</strong> component has a referential lexical (and sometimesgrammatical) function, and (2) <strong>the</strong> second component has a general-emotional, non-