who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ... who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

10.07.2015 Views

288• Vocal harmonizing. Guitar sound and generally instrumentaltexture was crucial for pop and particularly rock music followers. Paul McCartneyhimself relished himself first and foremost as a base player, then as a singer, and then as asongwriter. Elvis Presley could himself play a guitar and this was in the eyes of theyoung Beatles a major achievement. Despite this high rank of guitar playing, The Beatleswere primarily a brilliant vocal band. Harmonizing was a crucial part of the Beatlessound. Many of the harmonic innovations that I was talking about, were realized in vocalharmonizing. Harmonizing was particularly active during the first period of the Beatlesexistence, when the songwriting between John and Paul was mostly based of the “groupmodel”. During the later period they did not have question-and-answer hocketing stylesongs with active and dynamic vocal interaction (like “It won’t be long”, or “Tell mewhy”) and harmonizing generally declined.Paul McCartney was mostly responsible for the richness of vocal harmonizingstyle of the Beatles. His vocal harmonizing in many of the Lennon’s songs was crucial tothe final sound of the song. It is difficult to imagine songs like “If I fell” and “Because”without Paul’s high harmonies. In these songs his harmony successfully competes withthe original leading melody. During the second period of their partnership it was mostlyPaul harmonizing in John and George’s songs (I am talking not about the wordlessharmonizing [like “doo”, “ah” or “la-la-la”], freely used by the Beatles, but about theactive contrapuntal intertwining of the melody and harmonizing parts, both using theverbal text).Brilliant vocal harmonies from the introduction of the song “Paperback writer”epitomize most of the elements I was discussing about the Beatles music language:starting the song with non-tonic harmony, pure a cappella sound, expressing the idea notwith a melody, but with a combination of melodies, richness of the four-part harmony,wide us of several drones and clashing dissonant seconds:Fig. 17. Opening a’cappella harmonies of “Paperback Writer”ConclusionsProfound changes occurred in many important elements of popular music,particularly from the second half of the 20 th Century, no questions about that.Contemporary means of technology, sound-recording, media, communications,globalization, legal system, issues of performance rights and booming marketing systemcreated a phenomenon that is difficult to compare to any other musical (or cultural)

289phenomenon in the history of the humankind. At the same time, as I tried to demonstrateon the example of the Beatles, few very important elements of the ancient traditionalpolyphony came back in the rock-musician’s songwriting practices, performance style,and even their harmonic and melodic style. According to these elements the legacy of theBeatles is closer to the traditional polyphonic cultures than to early classic R’n’Roll.Some of these elements are:• Group creative process and the unity of composers and performers;• Music is composed and recorded orally, mostly by individuals withoutclassical music education;• No formal rules of harmony or counterpoint – ear is the only legitimate pointof reference;• Unparalleled (in classical music or even jazz) close connections between theperformers and the listeners;• Unrestricted richness of chordal changes and new colorful modulations;• Partial diminishing of the role of the pure vocal melody, and particularimportance of the harmonic element (sometimes puzzling professional musicologists,unable to decide which of the harmonizing melodies is the “main melody”);• Ambiguity of tonal centre; beginning and finishing musical composition withother than tonic harmonies;• Wide use of the secondal connection between the chords;• Changes to the all-important (for classical musical system) dominant chord;• The wide and innovative use of the dissonances;• Wide use of vocal and instrumental drones, particularly on the top and in themiddle of the musical texture.Many of the elements that were successfully used by the Beatles, were later usedby othe r rock and pop-bands. In some cases certain elements were particularly widelyused by bands. For example, both “U2” and “Cold Play” started using drones in a highrange in a big part of their songs.Conclusions of the second partSecond part of the book is coming to an end. This part was fully dedicated to thecomparative perspectives of the research of traditional polyphony. Without going intodetail, let us have few most important conclusions to sum up the second part of the book:• Documented cases of the disappearance of polyphonic traditions in differentregions of the world, and the absence of the cases of the evolution of polyphony frommonophony in traditional music suggests that the general historical dynamics is thegradual disappearance of vocal polyphonic traditions. Therefore, the idea of the lateevolution of polyphony from monophony, dominating the musicological andethnomusicological literature for more than a century, is totally unsupported byexisting facts and must be discarded.

289phenomenon in <strong>the</strong> history of <strong>the</strong> humankind. At <strong>the</strong> same time, as I tried to demonstrateon <strong>the</strong> example of <strong>the</strong> Beatles, few very important elements of <strong>the</strong> ancient traditionalpolyphony came back in <strong>the</strong> rock-musician’s songwriting practices, performance style,and even <strong>the</strong>ir harmonic and melodic style. According to <strong>the</strong>se elements <strong>the</strong> legacy of <strong>the</strong>Beatles is closer to <strong>the</strong> traditional polyphonic cultures than to early classic R’n’Roll.Some of <strong>the</strong>se elements are:• Group creative process and <strong>the</strong> unity of composers and performers;• Music is composed and recorded orally, mostly by individuals withoutclassical music education;• No formal rules of harmony or counterpoint – ear is <strong>the</strong> only legitimate pointof reference;• Unparalleled (in classical music or even jazz) close connections between <strong>the</strong>performers and <strong>the</strong> listeners;• Unrestricted richness of chordal changes and new colorful modulations;• Partial diminishing of <strong>the</strong> role of <strong>the</strong> pure vocal melody, and particularimportance of <strong>the</strong> harmonic element (sometimes puzzling professional musicologists,unable to decide which of <strong>the</strong> harmonizing melodies is <strong>the</strong> “main melody”);• Ambiguity of tonal centre; beginning and finishing musical composition witho<strong>the</strong>r than tonic harmonies;• Wide use of <strong>the</strong> secondal connection between <strong>the</strong> chords;• Changes to <strong>the</strong> all-important (for classical musical system) dominant chord;• The wide and innovative use of <strong>the</strong> dissonances;• Wide use of vocal and instrumental drones, particularly on <strong>the</strong> top and in <strong>the</strong>middle of <strong>the</strong> musical texture.Many of <strong>the</strong> elements that were successfully used by <strong>the</strong> Beatles, were later usedby o<strong>the</strong> r rock and pop-bands. In some cases certain elements were particularly widelyused by bands. <strong>For</strong> example, both “U2” and “Cold Play” started using drones in a highrange in a big part of <strong>the</strong>ir songs.Conclusions of <strong>the</strong> second partSecond part of <strong>the</strong> book is coming to an end. This part was fully dedicated to <strong>the</strong>comparative perspectives of <strong>the</strong> research of traditional polyphony. Without going intodetail, let us have few most important conclusions to sum up <strong>the</strong> second part of <strong>the</strong> book:• Documented cases of <strong>the</strong> disappearance of polyphonic traditions in differentregions of <strong>the</strong> world, and <strong>the</strong> absence of <strong>the</strong> cases of <strong>the</strong> evolution of polyphony frommonophony in traditional music suggests that <strong>the</strong> general historical dynamics is <strong>the</strong>gradual disappearance of vocal polyphonic traditions. Therefore, <strong>the</strong> idea of <strong>the</strong> lateevolution of polyphony from monophony, dominating <strong>the</strong> musicological andethnomusicological literature for more than a century, is totally unsupported byexisting facts and must be discarded.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!