who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...
who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ... who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...
256sometimes called the Soviet Union. Later, after we moved to Australia in 1995, westarted to travel, and the first really big travel was the round-the-world tour on the lastyear of the 20 th century. Our round-the world ticket was covering the mouthwatering routfrom Melbourne to Los-Angeles, Chicago, London, Paris, Istanbul, Tbilisi (capital ofGeorgia) and back to Melbourne. I do not know if any of the readers thought about this,but viewing the forthcoming exciting route around the world on a small globe on mydesk, I remember having a thought about the direction of our round-the-world travel.“Everyone moves around the world going either to the western direction, or to the easterndirection”. Of course, from the point of view of the shape of the globe the ideas of “up”or “down” are purely arbitrary. I often imagine, when I am talking on the phone to myrelatives and friends in Georgia, or Europe, how they are strangely “upside down” for me(or I am “upside down” for them). So, theoretically it does not make any differencewhether we move around the world eastwards/westwards or southwards/northwards. Forexample, if you start your travel from Australia, you could as well go northwards andvisit Indonesia, China, Japan, Russian Far East, then fly over the North Pole, go throughCanada, USA, Mexico, Peru, Brazil, and then from Argentina (or Chile) you could flyover the Antarctica to Australia again. Do you think this route is less interesting? And ifyou want to make your travel more exciting and challenging, you could even try to spendfew days on Antarctica as well.Well, maybe this unusual direction of the round the world travel does not differfrom any other “usual” itineraries, when you are watching the globe on your desk. Maybesome airline companies will some day even offer this kind of unusual round-the worldtravel routs “across the North and South Poles” tours for a change, but the difference thatthe direction of the real round-the-world travel can make is enormous. Particularly, if theairplanes and large comfortable ocean liners have not been invented yet. I am talkingabout our ancestors, amazing travelers, who on foot colonized the vast regions of theworld long before the ocean liners and later plains came to the existence.The big difference is that in real life it is much easer to travel long distanceseastwards or westwards, than southwards or northwards. The reason is very simple. If wemove to north, it will be getting colder every few hundred kilometers, and if we move tosouth, it will be becoming increasingly hotter. In southern hemisphere the directions for“hotter” and “colder” temperatures are naturally reversed. On the other hand, if you travelwestwards (or eastwards), you may travel within changing, but still in relativelycomfortable for your health temperatures and ecology for tens of thousand kilometers.The position of the Sun and the degree its rays fall on the surface of the earth is crucialfor this. Direct sunlight in the tropical region, moderate degree of sunrays falling on theearth in more moderate regions, and very high degree of sunrays falling on the earthcloser to the poles are chiefly responsible for the drastic differences between thetemperatures on our planet.Sunlight is not the only facilitator (or the challenge) for the large-scalemigrations. Another obvious factor is the geography of continents. Continents have notbeen designed for the easy travel on foot, and are interspersed with seas, big rivers,mountain ranges and other natural challenges for travelers. Therefore, although ourdistant ancestors did not have to apply for the tourist or student visa to travel and settle onnew territories, they were constrained in their travels by these two important factors: (1)the availability of the more or lesscomfortable ecological zones to travel and to settle in
257new territories (subject to the availability of Sunrays), and (2) natural geography ofcontinents.Roughly speaking, we could divide our planet into three huge ecological zones:(1) cold, (2) hot, and (3) moderate. Hot (or Equatorial) zone is a single belt, going aroundthe world roughly along the equator. Both “cold” and “moderate” zones are each of themtwo, one in each of the hemispheres. “Cold” zones are at the North and South Poles, andthe “moderate” zones are sandwiched between the “hot” equatorial and “cold” polezones.Why do I need to talk about these obvious things? When we are talking about thelarge-scale migrations, we need to take into account these very simple geographical andecological factors. Combination of the two factors (position of the Sun and naturalgeography of continents and big regions) determines the direction of the major, orstrategic migrations in human history. Based on a special study of the variation of genefrequencies and their principal components associated with latitude and longitude (Piazzaet al. 1981), Cavalli-Sforza concludes: “Longitude showed a major effect, notsurprisingly, given that most of human genetic variation is placed on an east-west axisthat reflects the most important population movements” (Cavalli-Sforza et al., 1994:142)These factors explain, for example, why the traces of sub-Saharan Africanpopulations (living mostly in tropical environment) are not found in Central or NorthEurope, or in Central or North Asia. The only available point to reach the New World(Bering Strait) was also a beyond the comfort climatic zone of sub-Saharan Africanpopulations.Because of the same climatic constrains Europeans did not go into deep into thetropical Africa until the 19 th century. And even in the 19 th century this was not easy –read about the travel of David Livingston or Henry M. Stanley.Because of the same climatic constrains East Asian populations did not go deepinto the tropical forests of the Southeast Asia and did not reach Australia until relativelyrecent times.So, large-scale travel towards north or south seems to be extremely difficult toconduct. On the other hand, travel possibilities towards the east and west were widelyopened for every population willing to travel to new territories. This is main reason thatmany great travelers in human history and prehistory were “following the Sun”, or,alternatively, were going towards the “place where Sun rises”. There is a great ecologicalwisdom in these symbolic destinations. Follow the sun and you will stay warm.Different human populations were formed in different regions of the world anddifferent ecological conditions. Some were formed in the tropical “belt”, and others in themoderate or even cold conditions.Sub-Saharan African populations were formed in tropical belt. Naturallyconstrained from the westwards migrations from Africa, the eastwards route was not veryeasy either, although still was not impossible. In a contemporary world the populations,possibly related to sub-Saharan African populations, are found on the eastwards directionfrom Africa - in several pockets of the southern and northeastern tropical regions ofIndia, up to Melanesia.European populations were formed in the relatively moderate and cold climaticconditions. Eastward large-scale migration was the natural direction for them as well.
- Page 205 and 206: 205Even in cases of century- and mi
- Page 207 and 208: 207With the convincing and well-doc
- Page 209 and 210: 209Conclusions for the previous two
- Page 211 and 212: 211Indo-European family of language
- Page 213 and 214: 213all musicians are Bachs, but all
- Page 215 and 216: 215Switzerland, Germany, Austria, I
- Page 217 and 218: 217evidence for them. If a proto-Ca
- Page 219 and 220: 219West and Central Asia. Solo perf
- Page 221 and 222: 221monophonic singing styles. So, w
- Page 223 and 224: 223(1) Drone dissonant-based polyph
- Page 225 and 226: 225the ancient drone polyphony with
- Page 227 and 228: 227major forests, islands, continen
- Page 229 and 230: 229the influence of the “oriental
- Page 231 and 232: 231• Florian Messner (1980) point
- Page 233 and 234: 233(“collective”) sutartines wi
- Page 235 and 236: 235Case Study #7Overtone Singing of
- Page 237 and 238: 237together wit Valentina Suzukei (
- Page 239 and 240: 239(8) As harmonics are a universal
- Page 241 and 242: 241(as “collective sutartines”)
- Page 243 and 244: 243perspective, can provide more us
- Page 245 and 246: 245For a further discussion of this
- Page 247 and 248: 247with two other parts, sung by so
- Page 249 and 250: 249that there is hardly a single do
- Page 251 and 252: 251hairiness, Cavalli-Sforza sites
- Page 253 and 254: 253Two possible historical models m
- Page 255: 255where the former pearl diving bo
- Page 259 and 260: 259minimum? And did the development
- Page 261 and 262: 261settlement history, and the most
- Page 263 and 264: 263instruments from Mediterranean r
- Page 265 and 266: 265music transcription. There are 5
- Page 267 and 268: 267• Even the transcription of Ku
- Page 269 and 270: 269“Music iconography can reveal
- Page 271 and 272: 271specific double flute made from
- Page 273 and 274: 273Case Study #14Polynesian Polypho
- Page 275 and 276: 275complexity plus precise enunciat
- Page 277 and 278: 277Case Study #15The Beatles: Ancie
- Page 279 and 280: 279Acknowledging the crucial differ
- Page 281 and 282: 281• Performance style. Arguably
- Page 283 and 284: 283C-major key, G major chord could
- Page 285 and 286: 285Ending of the songs on non-tonic
- Page 287 and 288: 287Fig. 16. Medieval West Georgian
- Page 289 and 290: 289phenomenon in the history of the
- Page 291 and 292: 291North America (according to the
- Page 293 and 294: 293Part 3Singing, Questioning, Thin
- Page 295 and 296: 295European and Middle Eastern mono
- Page 297 and 298: 297This characteristic raises one s
- Page 299 and 300: 299is not only a linguistic problem
- Page 301 and 302: 301with all their communicative ski
- Page 303 and 304: 303cooperative (and not competitive
- Page 305 and 306: 305group and groom each other, they
256sometimes called <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union. Later, after we moved to Australia in 1995, westarted to travel, and <strong>the</strong> <strong>first</strong> really big travel was <strong>the</strong> round-<strong>the</strong>-world tour on <strong>the</strong> lastyear of <strong>the</strong> 20 th century. Our round-<strong>the</strong> world ticket was covering <strong>the</strong> mouthwatering routfrom Melbourne to Los-Angeles, Chicago, London, Paris, Istanbul, Tbilisi (capital ofGeorgia) and back to Melbourne. I do not know if any of <strong>the</strong> readers thought about this,but viewing <strong>the</strong> forthcoming exciting route around <strong>the</strong> world on a small globe on mydesk, I remember having a thought about <strong>the</strong> direction of our round-<strong>the</strong>-world travel.“Everyone moves around <strong>the</strong> world going ei<strong>the</strong>r to <strong>the</strong> western direction, or to <strong>the</strong> easterndirection”. Of course, from <strong>the</strong> point of view of <strong>the</strong> shape of <strong>the</strong> globe <strong>the</strong> ideas of “up”or “down” are purely arbitrary. I often imagine, when I am talking on <strong>the</strong> phone to myrelatives and friends in Georgia, or Europe, how <strong>the</strong>y are strangely “upside down” for me(or I am “upside down” for <strong>the</strong>m). So, <strong>the</strong>oretically it does not make any differencewhe<strong>the</strong>r we move around <strong>the</strong> world eastwards/westwards or southwards/northwards. <strong>For</strong>example, if you start your travel from Australia, you could as well go northwards andvisit Indonesia, China, Japan, Russian Far East, <strong>the</strong>n fly over <strong>the</strong> North Pole, go throughCanada, USA, Mexico, Peru, Brazil, and <strong>the</strong>n from Argentina (or Chile) you could flyover <strong>the</strong> Antarctica to Australia again. Do you think this route is less interesting? And ifyou want to make your travel more exciting and challenging, you could even try to spendfew days on Antarctica as well.Well, maybe this unusual direction of <strong>the</strong> round <strong>the</strong> world travel does not differfrom any o<strong>the</strong>r “usual” itineraries, when you are watching <strong>the</strong> globe on your desk. Maybesome airline companies will some day even offer this kind of unusual round-<strong>the</strong> worldtravel routs “across <strong>the</strong> North and South Poles” tours for a change, but <strong>the</strong> difference that<strong>the</strong> direction of <strong>the</strong> real round-<strong>the</strong>-world travel can make is enormous. Particularly, if <strong>the</strong>airplanes and large comfortable ocean liners have not been invented yet. I am talkingabout our ancestors, amazing travelers, <strong>who</strong> on foot colonized <strong>the</strong> vast regions of <strong>the</strong>world long before <strong>the</strong> ocean liners and later plains came to <strong>the</strong> existence.The big difference is that in real life it is much easer to travel long distanceseastwards or westwards, than southwards or northwards. The reason is very simple. If wemove to north, it will be getting colder every few hundred kilometers, and if we move tosouth, it will be becoming increasingly hotter. In sou<strong>the</strong>rn hemisphere <strong>the</strong> directions for“hotter” and “colder” temperatures are naturally reversed. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, if you travelwestwards (or eastwards), you may travel within changing, but still in relativelycomfortable for your health temperatures and ecology for tens of thousand kilometers.The position of <strong>the</strong> Sun and <strong>the</strong> degree its rays fall on <strong>the</strong> surface of <strong>the</strong> earth is crucialfor this. Direct sunlight in <strong>the</strong> tropical region, moderate degree of sunrays falling on <strong>the</strong>earth in more moderate regions, and very high degree of sunrays falling on <strong>the</strong> earthcloser to <strong>the</strong> poles are chiefly responsible for <strong>the</strong> drastic differences between <strong>the</strong>temperatures on our planet.Sunlight is not <strong>the</strong> only facilitator (or <strong>the</strong> challenge) for <strong>the</strong> large-scalemigrations. Ano<strong>the</strong>r obvious factor is <strong>the</strong> geography of continents. Continents have notbeen designed for <strong>the</strong> easy travel on foot, and are interspersed with seas, big rivers,mountain ranges and o<strong>the</strong>r natural challenges for travelers. Therefore, although ourdistant ancestors did not have to apply for <strong>the</strong> tourist or student visa to travel and settle onnew territories, <strong>the</strong>y were constrained in <strong>the</strong>ir travels by <strong>the</strong>se two important factors: (1)<strong>the</strong> availability of <strong>the</strong> more or lesscomfortable ecological zones to travel and to settle in