10.07.2015 Views

who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

241(as “collective sutartines”), but in a different style, heavily influenced by <strong>the</strong> lateEuropean professional music;• Canon is <strong>the</strong> dominating type of polyphony in sutartines while in Nuristan <strong>the</strong>reare hardly any traces of it;• Polytonality is a “trademark” of <strong>the</strong> unique secondal sutartines. Secondalclashes in Nuristan polyphony and <strong>the</strong> two melodic centres are organized within onetonality, without real polytonal content;• The leading rhythm in Nuristan in 6/8, while in sutartines it is 4/4;• Change of key (or harmony) happens in sutartines after three bars, so <strong>the</strong> six-barstructure is equally divided into two sections. In Nuristan <strong>the</strong> change occurs within <strong>the</strong>three-bar structure;• Sutartines were traditionally performed by women only, while Nuristanpolyphony is performed both by women and men (separately and even toge<strong>the</strong>r);• In sutartines <strong>the</strong> number of performers is strictly limited by <strong>the</strong> tradition,allowing only two, three, or four performers to sing any example of sutartines. InNuristan <strong>the</strong> number of performers is not limited, so bigger and not so strictly organizedgroups can participate in singing;• Lithuanian sutartines is a two-part polyphony, while Nuristan polyphony ismostly three-part;• Lithuanian sutartines it an example of a cappella singing, while in Nuristanmusical instruments (most prominently <strong>the</strong> archaic harp wadzh and percussion) oftenaccompanies polyphonic singing;• There are several well-defined styles of sutartines in Lithuania (including <strong>the</strong>canonic, heterophonic, drone types) while <strong>the</strong>re is generally only one style of traditionalpolyphony in Nuristan;• Some Lithuanian sutartines sub-types display <strong>the</strong> obvious influence of <strong>the</strong>European professional style, while <strong>the</strong>re are hardly any traces of <strong>the</strong> influence ofEuropean professional music on Nuristan polyphony;• And finally, sharing <strong>the</strong> fate of many o<strong>the</strong>r polyphonic traditions, Lithuaniansutartines was completely lost as a folk tradition, while Nuristan polyphony is stillactively functioning in a society.As promised, here is <strong>the</strong> second list, discussing common elements between <strong>the</strong>sutartines and Nuristan polyphony:• Both traditions are based on <strong>the</strong> wide use of ostinato polyphony;• Both traditions make wide use of specific Lydian scale with <strong>the</strong> augmentedfourth.• In both traditions seconds are almost <strong>the</strong> only harmonic interval heard at anytime;• Melodies have a small range – mostly third or fourth (or augmented fourth);• Rhythmic recitation on <strong>the</strong> same note is an important part of <strong>the</strong> melodicdevelopment of both sutartines and Nuristan polyphony;• Melodic development of <strong>the</strong> leading parts often is based on <strong>the</strong> abundance ofsmall jumps on <strong>the</strong> thirds;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!