10.07.2015 Views

who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

238(4) Overtone singing is distributed among several peoples of Central Asia,and <strong>the</strong> strongest traditions were found among <strong>the</strong> following peoples:(a) Western Tuva, (b) Western Mongolians, and (c) <strong>the</strong> Altai-Sayanmountain region peoples.(5)We have already discussed in a special “Case Study” <strong>the</strong> musicalinfluence of <strong>the</strong> early Indo-Europeans in several European polyphoniccultures, where <strong>the</strong> mixture of two different (polyphonic andmonophonic) singing styles created a totally new polyphonic singingstyle with <strong>the</strong> element of both “parent” styles: with <strong>the</strong> drone, widemelismatic melodies and free rhythmic flow. I propose that in <strong>the</strong> caseof overtone singing we again have <strong>the</strong> result of ano<strong>the</strong>r extremelyinteresting mixture of different (polyphonic and monophonic)singing traditions: <strong>the</strong> singing style of <strong>the</strong> earlier population ofcentral Asia (supposedly carriers of drone polyphony) was mixedwith <strong>the</strong> singing style of new populations (supposedly carriers ofmonophonic singing traditions).(6) The results of this mixture reflected <strong>the</strong> intensity of <strong>the</strong> new populationinflux in Central Asia. Characteristics of contemporary populationsuggest that <strong>the</strong> contribution of <strong>the</strong> new arrivals was much bigger than<strong>the</strong> contribution of <strong>the</strong> older population. The same must be said about<strong>the</strong> singing traditions of this region. They reflect <strong>the</strong> much biggercontribution of <strong>the</strong> Asian (monophonic) element in music traditions.That’s why <strong>the</strong>re are no o<strong>the</strong>r “usual” types of vocal polyphony in thisregion, and that’s why one of <strong>the</strong> cornerstones of vocal polyphony –social interaction by means of vocal activity – is absent in <strong>the</strong> traditionof overtone singing.(7) At <strong>the</strong> same time, <strong>the</strong> most persistent element of <strong>the</strong> previous(supposedly ancient European vocal polyphonic style – <strong>the</strong> drone – hassurvived <strong>the</strong> ethnic and cultural assimilation and is still present in <strong>the</strong>singing traditions of contemporary Central Asia. We will discuss laterin this part one of <strong>the</strong> universal historical steps of <strong>the</strong> process of <strong>the</strong>loss of vocal polyphonic traditions: replacement of ano<strong>the</strong>r singer (aspolyphony is meant to be performed by more than one singer) by newtechnical means: “if no one is going to sing toge<strong>the</strong>r with me, I’ll singpolyphony on my own”. This resulted, for example, in <strong>the</strong> creation ofpolyphonic (double, triple and even quadruple) blown instruments(we’ll discuss this issue a bit later, in a “case study” about AncientMesopotamian and Ancient Mesoamerican civilizations). In <strong>the</strong> case ofCentral Asia a brilliant artistic solution was found: without <strong>the</strong> help ofmusical instrument, <strong>the</strong> possibilities of polyphony were found within<strong>the</strong> human voice-production system.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!