10.07.2015 Views

who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

23In this chapter I will discuss <strong>the</strong> distribution of <strong>the</strong> tradition of vocal polyphony indifferent parts of <strong>the</strong> world. No hypo<strong>the</strong>ses and no <strong>the</strong>ories, just what we know todayabout <strong>the</strong> worldwide distribution of vocal polyphony.Of course, it would be naïve to hope that all <strong>the</strong> existed regional styles oftraditional polyphony will be represented in this chapter. Despite <strong>the</strong> fact I have beenintensely interested in distribution of traditional polyphony for more than 25 years, havebeen organizing a number of special international conferences entirely dedicated to <strong>the</strong>problems of traditional polyphony, had been preparing for <strong>the</strong> publications materials(abstracts, extended abstracts and <strong>the</strong> full papers) of <strong>the</strong>se conferences and Symposia, andhave been it touch with number of leading experts of traditional polyphony from around<strong>the</strong> world, <strong>the</strong> picture of <strong>the</strong> distribution of traditional polyphony on our planet is by nomeans complete. There is no doubt that <strong>the</strong>re are still plenty of unknown traditions ofvocal polyphony in many regions of <strong>the</strong> world. I have few reasons for this belief:‣ There is a tendency in national scholarly traditions to be occupied with a“trademark” phenomenon of <strong>the</strong> certain musical cultures (like raga inIndia, gamelan in Bali, vocal polyphony in Georgia, or mugam inAzerbaijan). This tendency does create a convenient basis for <strong>the</strong> studyof <strong>the</strong>se “trademark” traditions, but at <strong>the</strong> same time most of <strong>the</strong> “nonmainstream”cultural phenomena often fall into neglect. That’s why Iexpect that some pockets of traditional polyphony could be stillconcealed under <strong>the</strong> shadow of <strong>the</strong> stereotype of so-called “monophoniccultures”.‣ Big part of <strong>the</strong> ethnomusicological production is still published innational periodicals, and mostly in national languages. This factorseverely limits <strong>the</strong>ir accessibility to <strong>the</strong> Western reader (and not only).‣ Even if <strong>the</strong> results of <strong>the</strong> work of scholars from different countries reach<strong>the</strong> Western reader, <strong>the</strong>re is a chance that <strong>the</strong>se results will not be easilycompatible with <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r existing studies. Ethnomusicology is stillsuffering from <strong>the</strong> lack of unified methodology and terminology inmany areas, including traditional polyphony.Question of terminology and classificationBefore we start discussing polyphonic traditions of different parts of <strong>the</strong> world, Iwould like to discuss briefly <strong>the</strong> terminology that I am going to use in this book.Unfortunately, as in many o<strong>the</strong>r spheres, ethnomusicology does not have <strong>the</strong> commonlyaccepted set of terms in this field that everyone could follow easily without muchmisunderstanding.Quite a few different terms had been used in ethnomusicology to denote <strong>the</strong>phenomenon of singing in more than one part. “Polyphony” seems to be <strong>the</strong> most widely

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!