10.07.2015 Views

who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

197(2) Ano<strong>the</strong>r inconvenience is that closely related cultures (or even within<strong>the</strong> same culture) sometimes use different scales. <strong>For</strong> example, among<strong>the</strong> sub-Saharan African cultures, obviously connected to each o<strong>the</strong>r,some traditional cultures are based on tetratonic, some pentatonic,some hexatonic and some diatonic scale systems, and some use morethan one scale.The rhythm and metre are also universally important for both monophonic andpolyphonic cultures, as <strong>the</strong> “building blocks of timing”. Like scales, some rhythms arealso spread too widely through different continents to be helpful in comparative researchof polyphonic studies. <strong>For</strong> example, simple duple and triple rhythms are actively used ina huge number of musical cultures all over <strong>the</strong> world. Ano<strong>the</strong>r, more specific example is<strong>the</strong> use of rhythmic formulas, and indeed, some of <strong>the</strong> comparative research even hasbeen done relying on certain rhythmic formulas only (for example, see Zemtsovsky,1990). As a general tendency, we may say that polyphonic cultures mostly tend to usesimple and precise rhythms, although this can by no means be considered a rule (forexample, Ba lkans are <strong>the</strong> obvious, and not <strong>the</strong> only exception).Therefore, as we can see, most of <strong>the</strong> comparative research presented in thisbook is based on specific parameters, connected to <strong>the</strong> polyphonic texture.- : - :- : - : - : - : - : - : -So, we have discussed <strong>the</strong> general methodology of <strong>the</strong> comparative study ofpolyphonic traditions, <strong>the</strong>n became witnesses of <strong>the</strong> amazing stability of musicaltraditions (and particularly – <strong>the</strong> stability of polyphonic traditions), <strong>the</strong>n had a look at afew cases of borrowing particular songs and discussed <strong>the</strong> mobile and stable elements ofmusical cultures. We have also discussed <strong>the</strong> importance of different parameters of <strong>the</strong>polyphonic texture for comparative analyses, and finally, we have established <strong>the</strong> set ofall-important parameters that are going to guide us through <strong>the</strong> comparativegeneralizations of polyphonic cultures. So, we are ready to move on.Section 2. Practical IssuesRegions, Styles, Peoples, Migrations:Historical Dynamics and Comparative PerspectivesI consider this section <strong>the</strong> most important for <strong>the</strong> general idea of this study. Ofcourse, <strong>the</strong> issues, discussed in <strong>the</strong> third part of this book (origins of choral singing,intertwined with t he origins of human intelligence, language and speech) are much widerand should be naturally considered more important, but this part is <strong>the</strong> main historical“engine” for <strong>the</strong> suggested model of <strong>the</strong> origins of vocal polyphony.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!