10.07.2015 Views

who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

188present a couple of brief historical examples of <strong>the</strong> stability of musical traditions from <strong>the</strong>cultures I know:(1) Ossetians live on both sides of <strong>the</strong> central part of <strong>the</strong> Caucasian mountainrange. They speak <strong>the</strong> Indo-Iranian language and were considered to be <strong>the</strong> descendantsof <strong>the</strong> Medieval Indo-Iranian tribe Alans. A study of <strong>the</strong> physical features ofcontemporary Ossetians, Medieval Alans, and <strong>the</strong> earlier Caucasian population of thisregion suggested that <strong>the</strong> Indo-European (Indo-Iranian) Alans in fact did not have muchimpact on <strong>the</strong> genetic make-up of <strong>the</strong> Ossetians (Alexeev, 1974a:197-200). On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rhand <strong>the</strong>re is a clear morphologic continuum between <strong>the</strong> earlier Caucasian populationand contemporary Ossetians. Therefore, <strong>the</strong> change of language must have occurredwithout a change of <strong>the</strong> major part of <strong>the</strong> indigenous population. Scholars are well awareof such cases when language is lost without <strong>the</strong> population replacement. The music of <strong>the</strong>Ossetians, unlike <strong>the</strong>ir language, shows a clear relationship with o<strong>the</strong>r, indigenousCaucasian populations. This brings us to <strong>the</strong> conclusion that although <strong>the</strong> old Ossetianpopulation of <strong>the</strong> Central Caucasian Mountains lost <strong>the</strong>ir language, <strong>the</strong>ir musicaltraditions survived <strong>the</strong> painful process of <strong>the</strong>ir cultural assimilation.(2) The neighboring Balkarians and Karachaevis represent <strong>the</strong> same kind ofhistorical story. Both of <strong>the</strong>m speak <strong>the</strong> Turkic language, are Moslems, and were believedto be <strong>the</strong> descendants of late medieval Turkic tribes <strong>who</strong> brought <strong>the</strong> Turkic language andMoslem religion to <strong>the</strong> North Caucasus in <strong>the</strong> 16 th -17 th centuries. Anthropologicalsurveys of <strong>the</strong> Balkarian and Karachaevian populations proved that, as in <strong>the</strong> case of <strong>the</strong>Ossetians, <strong>the</strong>re has been no serious trace of a genetic relationship between <strong>the</strong>Balkarians and Karachaevis on one side, and <strong>the</strong> population of <strong>the</strong> late medieval Turkicnewcomers on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r side. Instead, <strong>the</strong>re is an obvious genetic continuum between <strong>the</strong>earlier Caucasian population and <strong>the</strong> Balkarian and Karachaevian populations (Alexeev,1974a:200-203). This means that <strong>the</strong> old Caucasian population adopted <strong>the</strong> new languageand religion without being physically replaced by <strong>the</strong> carriers of this new language andculture. Their music, unlike <strong>the</strong>ir language, has not been assimilated in this process.Therefore, <strong>the</strong> contemporary musical traditions of all North Caucasian peoples, toge<strong>the</strong>rwith <strong>the</strong>ir physical morphology, demonstrate <strong>the</strong> survival of <strong>the</strong> genetic and cultural unityof <strong>the</strong> indigenous populations of Caucasia.(3) Ano<strong>the</strong>r example of <strong>the</strong> solid stability of musical traditions could be <strong>the</strong>Balkan mountainous region. This region is a tapestry of different Indo-Europeanlanguages, at least two major religions and countless cultural traditions. At <strong>the</strong> same time,physical anthropologists propose that <strong>the</strong> populations of <strong>the</strong> mountainous regions of <strong>the</strong>Balkans show <strong>the</strong> obvious signs of (1) morphological unity within <strong>the</strong> Balkan mountainranges, and (2) a genetic continuum from <strong>the</strong> ancient pre-Indo-European population (<strong>the</strong>so-called “Dinarian” anthropologic type). This ancient “Dinarian” type is <strong>the</strong> bestrepresented among <strong>the</strong> populations of southwestern Bulgaria, of nor<strong>the</strong>rn mountainousGreece, mountain Albania, Macedonia, Serbia, Montenegro, Croatia, Bosnia andHerzegovina. These populations currently have different languages and differentreligions, which means that new languages and religions spread here without <strong>the</strong>replacement of <strong>the</strong> major part of <strong>the</strong> indigenous population. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, music alsoshows clear signs of <strong>the</strong> ancient unity of all <strong>the</strong>se regions. Drone type of polyphony withspecific frictional (secondal) harmonies is spread throughout virtually <strong>the</strong> samemountainous regions as <strong>the</strong> Dinaric physical anthropologic type: southwestern Bulgaria,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!