10.07.2015 Views

who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

172ConclusionsThe following general conclusions can be formulated:‣ South American Indian music has a few interesting regions ofdistribution of group polyphonic singing, although in many regions<strong>the</strong>se are only a loosely coordinated heterophonic singing traditions.‣ Among a few South American Indian peoples <strong>the</strong> tradition ofpolyphonic singing is particularly important (as among <strong>the</strong> Q’eros from<strong>the</strong> high mountainous Cusco region).‣ Generally speaking, <strong>the</strong> Andean region is <strong>the</strong> most important region ofdistribution of polyphonic traditions. Here drone polyphony, uniquethroughout South America, was documented.‣ Quite a few Amazonian forest tribes also actively employ group singing,resulting in heterophony.‣ The abundance of polyphonic blown instruments raises a <strong>question</strong> about<strong>the</strong> presence of polyphony (at least, instrumental polyphony) among precontactSouth and Central American cultures.Polyphonic singingon Pacific IslandsCovering about half of our planet (but only a fraction of <strong>the</strong> world’s population),<strong>the</strong> Pacific Ocean is <strong>the</strong> home of an amazing richness of vocal polyphonic traditions.Both Marius Schneider in his 1934-1935 “History of Polyphony” and later Alan Lomaxin his 1968 “Folk Song Style and Culture” placed <strong>the</strong> Oceania islands (particularlyPolynesia and Melanesia) among <strong>the</strong> three most polyphonic major regions of <strong>the</strong> world(<strong>the</strong> two o<strong>the</strong>rs being sub-Saharan Africa and Europe).PolynesiaPerhaps one of <strong>the</strong> most important historical lessons that Oceania (andparticularly Polynesia) taught European musicology (in <strong>the</strong> 18 th century) was <strong>the</strong> shock of<strong>the</strong> discovery that well-organized part-singing can exist far from European civilization.The very <strong>first</strong> encounters of European travelers with <strong>the</strong> Pacific Ocean Islandcommunities brought to light <strong>the</strong>ir strong predilection towards vocal polyphonic singing.From 1773 records come <strong>the</strong> following descriptions: “This set most of <strong>the</strong> women in <strong>the</strong>circle singing <strong>the</strong>ir songs were musical and harmonious, noways harsh or disagreeable”,or: “Not <strong>the</strong>ir voices only but <strong>the</strong>ir music also was very harmonious & <strong>the</strong>y haveconsiderable compass in <strong>the</strong>ir notes” (Beaglehole, 1962:246). Some descriptions are evenmore precise: “They sing in parts, keeping <strong>the</strong> same time and varying <strong>the</strong> four noteswithout ever going beyond <strong>the</strong>m. So many singers and so few notes you always hear <strong>the</strong><strong>who</strong>le toge<strong>the</strong>r. The difference of Words & Voices makes some variety. The singers (thatI heard) were all women. One confined herself entirely to <strong>the</strong> Lower Note which acted asDrone” – this eloquent description comes from Cook’s second 1772-1775 voyage

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!