who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ... who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

10.07.2015 Views

146Polyphony in Jewish musicPolyphonic singing is not a very common feature of Jewish traditional music andliturgical service. “Despite efforts by German immigrants who introduced their choraltradition to synagogues in Haifa in the 1930s, and by Sephardi musicians such asRahamim Amar (in Sephardi synagogues the choir sang in unison), few synagoguesemploy a trained choir. This lack of choral music can be traced to the fact that theorthodox establishment identified choral music with non-orthodox synagogues, and it hasled to a lack of a native choral repertoire for the synagogue in Israel (unlike Europe andNorth America)” (Seroussi, 2002:205). As far as I know, the elements of vocalpolyphony in Jewish music were first studied by M. Ravina, who delivered a paper at theAnthropological Congress in Moscow in 1964. This issue was specially researched inmore detail by Gerson-Kiwi in her 1968 publication (re-published in 1980). Interestingly,despite the generally accepted fact that “choirs have not made an inroad into the Israelisynagogue” (Seroussi, 2002:205), polyphony is observed mostly in synagogue singing.More specifically, Gerson-Kiwi discusses three regional styles of Jewish polyphony:Yemen Jews, the Samaritans and Corfu Jews (with a plenty of musical examples).Yemenite part-singing is connected to the liturgical forms, and Gerson-Kiwimentions them as “Psalm-polyphony or a prayer-polyphony” (Gerson-Kiwi, 1980:69).She distinguishes four forms of polyphony among Yemenite Jews:( a) Vocal drone (exists in prayers). This is two-part singing with a drone. Themelody has a short range – third only (A-C). With the additional tone “G” the rangeincreases to a fourth. Dissonant seconds are frequent between the drone and the melody.“As the diapason is so narrow, the main interval is the second, but the sharp dissonantclusters do not in the least irritate the singers: their auditive perception can only followthe horizontal path, and in this selective hearing the chords simply do not exist. But theydo exist for the unbiased observer and they have to be registered as a definite style ofpart-singing” (Gerson-Kiwi , 1980:70). Generally, I am always skeptical about the ideathat “singers do not hear these clashing intervals”, and Gerson Kiwi herself writes later inthis article (see later) about secondal dissonances that they “seems to be so congenial tothe Yemenite singers that there can be no question of haphazard intonation” (Gerson-Kiwi. 1980:72).(b) Choral polyphony of acclamations in Organum Technique (in Asmorot). Thisis a massed response from the entire congregation (including children) singing in a looseorganum of many different pitches. The author mentions that East African mass choruseshave the same kind of “sound columns” as in the Yemenite Jews’ singing. According toGerson-Kiwi this singing style must be very close to the real sound of the medievalorganum (According to Riemann’s 1898 publication, parallel fourths and fifths from themedieval musical tractates were considered to be a theoretical abstraction. Theappearance of the Icelandic tradition of two-part parallel singing in perfect fifths changedthe attitude towards the early organum practice)(c) Vocal ostinato technique (in psalm reading). This form is based onsimultaneous singing of the main tune and accompanying short ostinato-motifs. Ostinatomotiveis developed around the tonic, and Gerson-Kiwi considers it to be “another trendoriginating from a basic drone form”.(d) Heterophonic part-singing (in religious hymns). Heterophonic singing starts asan organum, but “very soon softens down to a heterophonic singing in the narrowest

147possible space of a second.” These dissonances “seems to be so congenial to theYemenite singers that there can be no question of haphazard intonation” (Gerson-Kiwi.1980:72).(e) The style of parallel organum (in Yemenite wedding songs). In this style assoon as the leading singers starts a song, he is joined by the “chorus which adds the lowerfourth to the principal melody and maintains this organal technique until the end” (ibid,72):The presence of vocal polyphony among the Samaritans is particularlyinteresting as the Samaritans have been in “nearly complete social and cultural isolation”(Gerson-Kiwi, 1980:73). Three forms of polyphony had been distinguished by the author:(1) The canonic diaphony, based on a completely linear logic ofdevelopment with strict rhythmic organization, and without clearharmonic connections to each other: “one could even venture to saythat we have here an early example of atonality, though the canonicsections are thematically connected with each other and follow thesame modality. But in this interchained fabric where one sectionovercrosses the other, these orders are no longer effectual, and theauditive impression is that of a complete disruption of tonality”.According to Gerson-Kiwi, this technique is designed to shorten theprayer by reciting two different verses simultaneously. The authordraws parallels with the technique of motet of the ars antiqua (ibid, 75)(2) The organal homophony, resulting from reciting the text of “TheSong of the Sea” by the whole congregation. The thick sound consistsof the low consonances (tonic, fifth and the octave) and the array of thedissonant sounds.(3) Vocal drone organum. So, drone is present among the Samaritans aswell: “The solid sound columns moving over the drone with perfectease and brilliant tone color, provide one of the most advanced formsof a spontaneous polyphony” (ibid, 78).The third polyphonic tradition, discussed by Gerson-Kiwi, is in Greece, amongthe Jews of the Isle of Corfu. Two distinct styles are distinguished:(1) Bourdonized Third Parallels. As the name of the style suggests, themain melody is followed by a harmony-triad, and the drone is used togive support to the melody.(2) “Tenor-Motet” Style. This style consists of the organum-likemovements “of fifths, thirds and even seconds” with slightornamentation in the refrain.Then Gerson-Kiwi discusses the possibility of the external influence of traditionalpolyphony on Jewish polyphonic traditions from southern Albanians, NorthwesternGreece and Albanians living in southern Italy and comes to the conclusion that there areclear signs of such an influence.Some other sources from the Middle East also suggest the presence of organumtypeliturgical singing. H. Husmann discusses the singing in parallel fourths inSyrian Christian churches. He notes the closeness of the Syrian tradition to the

147possible space of a second.” These dissonances “seems to be so congenial to <strong>the</strong>Yemenite singers that <strong>the</strong>re can be no <strong>question</strong> of haphazard intonation” (Gerson-Kiwi.1980:72).(e) The style of parallel organum (in Yemenite wedding songs). In this style assoon as <strong>the</strong> leading singers starts a song, he is joined by <strong>the</strong> “chorus which adds <strong>the</strong> lowerfourth to <strong>the</strong> principal melody and maintains this organal technique until <strong>the</strong> end” (ibid,72):The presence of vocal polyphony among <strong>the</strong> Samaritans is particularlyinteresting as <strong>the</strong> Samaritans have been in “nearly complete social and cultural isolation”(Gerson-Kiwi, 1980:73). Three forms of polyphony had been distinguished by <strong>the</strong> author:(1) The canonic diaphony, based on a completely linear logic ofdevelopment with strict rhythmic organization, and without clearharmonic connections to each o<strong>the</strong>r: “one could even venture to saythat we have here an early example of atonality, though <strong>the</strong> canonicsections are <strong>the</strong>matically connected with each o<strong>the</strong>r and follow <strong>the</strong>same modality. But in this interchained fabric where one sectionovercrosses <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong>se orders are no longer effectual, and <strong>the</strong>auditive impression is that of a complete disruption of tonality”.According to Gerson-Kiwi, this technique is designed to shorten <strong>the</strong>prayer by reciting two different verses simultaneously. The authordraws parallels with <strong>the</strong> technique of motet of <strong>the</strong> ars antiqua (ibid, 75)(2) The organal homophony, resulting from reciting <strong>the</strong> text of “TheSong of <strong>the</strong> Sea” by <strong>the</strong> <strong>who</strong>le congregation. The thick sound consistsof <strong>the</strong> low consonances (tonic, fifth and <strong>the</strong> octave) and <strong>the</strong> array of <strong>the</strong>dissonant sounds.(3) Vocal drone organum. So, drone is present among <strong>the</strong> Samaritans aswell: “The solid sound columns moving over <strong>the</strong> drone with perfectease and brilliant tone color, provide one of <strong>the</strong> most advanced formsof a spontaneous polyphony” (ibid, 78).The third polyphonic tradition, discussed by Gerson-Kiwi, is in Greece, among<strong>the</strong> Jews of <strong>the</strong> Isle of Corfu. Two distinct styles are distinguished:(1) Bourdonized Third Parallels. As <strong>the</strong> name of <strong>the</strong> style suggests, <strong>the</strong>main melody is followed by a harmony-triad, and <strong>the</strong> drone is used togive support to <strong>the</strong> melody.(2) “Tenor-Motet” Style. This style consists of <strong>the</strong> organum-likemovements “of fifths, thirds and even seconds” with slightornamentation in <strong>the</strong> refrain.Then Gerson-Kiwi discusses <strong>the</strong> possibility of <strong>the</strong> external influence of traditionalpolyphony on Jewish polyphonic traditions from sou<strong>the</strong>rn Albanians, NorthwesternGreece and Albanians living in sou<strong>the</strong>rn Italy and comes to <strong>the</strong> conclusion that <strong>the</strong>re areclear signs of such an influence.Some o<strong>the</strong>r sources from <strong>the</strong> Middle East also suggest <strong>the</strong> presence of organumtypeliturgical singing. H. Husmann discusses <strong>the</strong> singing in parallel fourths inSyrian Christian churches. He notes <strong>the</strong> closeness of <strong>the</strong> Syrian tradition to <strong>the</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!