who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ... who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

10.07.2015 Views

141989:Let me briefly introduce some of the new ideas that were not part of my book in‣ My new understanding of what is polyphony, underlying the socialand musical factors of this phenomenon;‣ A much more accurate picture of the distribution of traditionalpolyphony all over the world;‣ A new stratification of the big intercontinental polyphonicfamilies;‣ Discussion of the importance of the big migration processes in theformation of contemporary stratification of polyphonic traditions in different partsof the world;‣ Discussion of the possibilities and the methods of comparativestudies of traditional polyphony, and a suggestion of the particular importance ofthe set of stylistic features for comparative studies of polyphonic cultures;‣ Attempts to analyse the historical dynamics of the distribution ofdifferent polyphonic forms, and discussion on the elusive issue of the dating ofsome of the traditions of vocal polyphony;‣ Discussion of the scale systems in the context of the interaction ofthe polyphonic and monophonic cultures (tetrachordal, pentachordal and octavescales, and why is the interval of the fourth the only exception in music history tobe regarded as a consonance earlier and turned later into a dissonance);‣ Suggestion that social polyphony (group singing), or, according toDieter Christensen, “multisonance” (Christensen, 2003) is one of the strongest(and one of the most ancient) universals of human communication;‣ Based on the model “singing without listeners” social polyphonymust have been present in all early human societies (the remnants of thisphenomenon are evident in both polyphonic and monophonic cultures)‣ The primacy of the rhythm and synchronic bodily movements forthe initial forms of hominid and human group singing;‣ Suggestion of precisely coordinated group singing of our hominidsancestors being one of the survival strategies against the major predators inAfrica, and the role of bigger group size;‣ A new model of the origins of human choral singing, as the centralfeature of pre-linguistic communication;‣ The role of human choral singing in creating the rhythmic flow ofhuman communication and later language.‣ Full support to the relatively recent suggestions that choral singingwas one of the main communication mediums for the social cohesion and bondingof early human communities before the development of articulated speech;‣ The suggestion that, after the change of the communicationmedium from singing into articulated speech, choral singing lost its direct survivalvalue has been gradually marginalised and started disappearing over the centuriesand millennia. Multiple examples of the gradual disappearance of traditions ofpolyphonic singing in different cultures support this supposition;

15‣ Discussion of the historical processes and dynamics of weakeningand gradual disappearance of the tradition of vocal polyphony (appearance of thedivision of the society on “singers” and “listeners”; advancement of individualismand the beginning of professionalism; replacement of polyphonic songs bymonophonic developed melodies comprising the most important points fromdifferent parts of the polyphonic texture; increasing the role of instrumentalpolyphony and the appearance of double wind instruments)‣ Suggestion of the particular importance of responsorial form ofgroup singing as one of the strongest universals of human musical culture andvocal communication, and the acknowledgement of the importance ofresponsorial singing in the emergence of the ability of asking questions;‣ The new idea that the ability to ask questions is possibly theuniquely human feature of our intelligence, and that the emergence of this abilitywas the most revolutionary change over the course of the evolution of humanlanguage and intelligence;‣ With the emergence of the uniquely human ability of askingquestions human brains turned into a self-developing and collectively organisedsystem;‣ I’ll try to demonstrate that the ability to answer questionsevolutionary preceded the ability to ask questions. The ability to answer questionsexists in the animal kingdom. Ground-breaking studies on apes” intelligenceproved that they are able to properly answer human questions and evenunderstand the meaning of some question words, although they does not seem touse these words themselves in “conversations” and they do not ask questions;‣ Suggestion that the ability of asking questions is a genetic trait ofthe human brain, but it does need an early development through communicativeinteraction with adult humans to develop this ability; There are some indicationsthat after the “critical period” the ability of asking questions may not develop in ahuman brain;‣ According to my model, the unification of the “languages” of apes,children under two, “wolf children”, and Creole languages under the notion of“protolanguage” (Bickerton, 1990, 2000) must be critically reviewed, becauseunlike the language of young children and Creole languages, wolf children’s andapes’ “language” does not contain a critically important feature of humanintelligence - asking questions;‣ In the same way I suggest that the critical difference between theintellectual development of human babies and the apes arises as soon as childrenstart asking their first questions, using the question intonation, long before theappearance of any syntactic structures in their speech;‣ According to my model, the appearance of human intelligence andhuman language (and consequently appearance of Homo sapiens) happened onthe musical communicative stage of development, long before the advance ofarticulated speech as the dominating medium of language.As for the development of articulated speech, most of the ideas on thisaccount were already part of my 1989 book.

141989:Let me briefly introduce some of <strong>the</strong> new ideas that were not part of my book in‣ My new understanding of what is polyphony, underlying <strong>the</strong> socialand musical factors of this phenomenon;‣ A much more accurate picture of <strong>the</strong> distribution of traditionalpolyphony all over <strong>the</strong> world;‣ A new stratification of <strong>the</strong> big intercontinental polyphonicfamilies;‣ Discussion of <strong>the</strong> importance of <strong>the</strong> big migration processes in <strong>the</strong>formation of contemporary stratification of polyphonic traditions in different partsof <strong>the</strong> world;‣ Discussion of <strong>the</strong> possibilities and <strong>the</strong> methods of comparativestudies of traditional polyphony, and a suggestion of <strong>the</strong> particular importance of<strong>the</strong> set of stylistic features for comparative studies of polyphonic cultures;‣ Attempts to analyse <strong>the</strong> historical dynamics of <strong>the</strong> distribution ofdifferent polyphonic forms, and discussion on <strong>the</strong> elusive issue of <strong>the</strong> dating ofsome of <strong>the</strong> traditions of vocal polyphony;‣ Discussion of <strong>the</strong> scale systems in <strong>the</strong> context of <strong>the</strong> interaction of<strong>the</strong> polyphonic and monophonic cultures (tetrachordal, pentachordal and octavescales, and why is <strong>the</strong> interval of <strong>the</strong> fourth <strong>the</strong> only exception in music history tobe regarded as a consonance earlier and turned later into a dissonance);‣ Suggestion that social polyphony (group singing), or, according toDieter Christensen, “multisonance” (Christensen, 2003) is one of <strong>the</strong> strongest(and one of <strong>the</strong> most ancient) universals of human communication;‣ Based on <strong>the</strong> model “singing without listeners” social polyphonymust have been present in all early human societies (<strong>the</strong> remnants of thisphenomenon are evident in both polyphonic and monophonic cultures)‣ The primacy of <strong>the</strong> rhythm and synchronic bodily movements for<strong>the</strong> initial forms of hominid and human group singing;‣ Suggestion of precisely coordinated group singing of our hominidsancestors being one of <strong>the</strong> survival strategies against <strong>the</strong> major predators inAfrica, and <strong>the</strong> role of bigger group size;‣ A new model of <strong>the</strong> origins of human choral singing, as <strong>the</strong> centralfeature of pre-linguistic communication;‣ The role of human choral singing in creating <strong>the</strong> rhythmic flow ofhuman communication and later language.‣ Full support to <strong>the</strong> relatively recent suggestions that choral singingwas one of <strong>the</strong> main communication mediums for <strong>the</strong> social cohesion and bondingof early human communities before <strong>the</strong> development of articulated speech;‣ The suggestion that, after <strong>the</strong> change of <strong>the</strong> communicationmedium from singing into articulated speech, choral singing lost its direct survivalvalue has been gradually marginalised and started disappearing over <strong>the</strong> centuriesand millennia. Multiple examples of <strong>the</strong> gradual disappearance of traditions ofpolyphonic singing in different cultures support this supposition;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!