10.07.2015 Views

who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In 1989 Tbilisi State University Press published my book on traditionalpolyphony (“Georgian Traditional Polyphony in <strong>the</strong> <strong>International</strong> Context of Polyphoniccultures: <strong>the</strong> Problem of Origins of Polyphony”). The book was published in Russianwith an English summary. There is no doubt that <strong>the</strong> intervening 15 years have broughtvery dramatic changes for many regions of <strong>the</strong> world, and particularly for <strong>the</strong> formerUSSR where I came from. The fall of <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union and <strong>the</strong> creation of newindependent states (including my native Georgia), <strong>the</strong> breakdown of <strong>the</strong> Iron Curtain andcommunist governments in East Europe, <strong>the</strong> advent of <strong>the</strong> Internet and emailcommunications has drastically changed <strong>the</strong> world and opened up revolutionary newpossibilities of interaction between peoples and cultures. Global confrontation between<strong>the</strong> different models of <strong>the</strong> future of humanity (capitalism vs. communism) changed into<strong>the</strong> confrontation of <strong>the</strong> future with <strong>the</strong> past of humanity (secular democracy vs. religiousfundamentalism).Ethnomusicologists were among those <strong>who</strong> benefited from <strong>the</strong> new possibilitiesof interaction between <strong>the</strong> cultures and scholars. In <strong>the</strong> wake of <strong>the</strong> increased interactionbetween <strong>the</strong> cultures of different regions of <strong>the</strong> world, <strong>the</strong> role of ethnomusicology isincreasing in <strong>the</strong> contemporary world. Freedom of travel and new possibilities forfieldwork in most regions of <strong>the</strong> world, new cooperation between scholars and researchinstitutions, and <strong>the</strong> migration of scholars (mostly from <strong>the</strong> former communist countriesand <strong>the</strong> Third World countries to Western countries) created a new global stratification ofethnomusicological research and resources.Traditional polyphony has been one of <strong>the</strong> most actively developing spheres ofresearch activity in ethnomusicology in <strong>the</strong> last twenty years. New national andinternational bodies, dedicated to <strong>the</strong> coordination of international research in <strong>the</strong> sphereof traditional polyphony, have emerged (Polifonies Vivantes in Paris, France;<strong>International</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Centre for Traditional Polyphony at Tbilisi State Conservatory,Georgia; European Centre of Study of Polyphony, Vienna, Austria). Conferences andsymposia fully dedicated to <strong>the</strong> problems of traditional polyphony have been held atdifferent national institutions (Georgia, France, Russia, Taiwan, Austria).It is not surprising that in <strong>the</strong> context of radically increased means ofcommunication a major body of new data on traditional polyphony has emerged. Thenew data and continuing research brought about a set of new ideas on <strong>the</strong> distribution andmechanisms of <strong>the</strong> evolution of traditional polyphony. In my 1989 book I tried tosummarise <strong>the</strong> situation to that moment, mostly without access to <strong>the</strong> major Westernlibraries and without <strong>the</strong> help of <strong>the</strong> Internet and email communication. Attempts weremade to translate and to publish <strong>the</strong> revised version of my book in English (I am verygrateful to Lynn Newman-Bertrand from <strong>the</strong> Emory University in Atlanta for her efforts),and for some time I was diligently preparing all sorts of additions (new materials andideas) to upgrade <strong>the</strong> text of my <strong>first</strong> book for its new revised (and translated intoEnglish) publication. The accumulation of new data and <strong>the</strong> development of new ideaswere going so rapidly that by <strong>the</strong> mid-1990s I realised that <strong>the</strong> book I wanted to bepublished was quite different from <strong>the</strong> one that I had published in 1989, both in <strong>the</strong> scopeof <strong>the</strong> materials and in <strong>the</strong> suggested model of evolution of traditional vocal polyphony.The idea of writing a new book arose.13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!