10.07.2015 Views

who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

129contracted this peculiarity of singing as well as <strong>the</strong>ir manner of speaking” (cited fromHibberd, 1955:8).From <strong>the</strong> later historical sources we know that an interesting style of polyphonicsinging – glee singing - existed in England. It was a non-professional tradition of singingin three or more parts, without instrumental accompaniment. The famous Copper familyof Rottingdean, Sussex, is believed to be a continuation of <strong>the</strong> earlier glee-singingtradition. Their songs have been recorded and documented. There were also o<strong>the</strong>r formsof polyphonic activity ell in <strong>the</strong> 18 th and 19 th centuries: “Church and military bandsplayed in harmony in <strong>the</strong> eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, and were widely heard andsung to” (Gammon, 2000:327).According to <strong>the</strong> available material, popular forms of harmonic singing inEngland are based on <strong>the</strong> common European classical system with parallel thirds andtriad chords. However, some examples of early English professional polyphony presentsano<strong>the</strong>r polyphonic singing style, based on <strong>the</strong> use of a drone, a small range of <strong>the</strong>melody, and secondal dissonances. Here is a rare example of earlier drone typeprofessional polyphony:Ex. 75. England. (Schneider, 1969, part 3, #35)Here we need to mention that besides <strong>the</strong> direct quite and detailed informationabout <strong>the</strong> vocal polyphony in England by Cambrensis, chronologically earlier sourcesfrom England also mention polyphony. Johan Scot Erigena, great Irish thinker of <strong>the</strong> 9 thcentury, speaks about <strong>the</strong> simultaneousness of <strong>the</strong> sounds for <strong>the</strong> idea of musical harmony(Handschin, 1932:513). Handschin mentions even <strong>the</strong> earlier source from <strong>the</strong> 7 th century,an Anglo-Saxon writer Aldhelm, <strong>who</strong>, according to Handschin “is <strong>the</strong> <strong>first</strong> medievalwriter <strong>who</strong> distinctly refers to part-singing” (ibid, 513).WalesIn <strong>the</strong> writings of Giraldus Cambrensis about part-singing in <strong>the</strong> British IslesWales occupies <strong>the</strong> central place (Hibberd, 1955). Cambrensis’ claim that “you can hearin Wales as many voices [parts] as <strong>the</strong>re are singers” might be an exaggeration, but <strong>the</strong>recan be little doubt that a well-developed tradition of traditional polyphony existed in 12 thcentury Wales.An interesting folk tradition of reading <strong>the</strong> biblical texts in two parts (at a fifthinterval) has been described by Kinney: “Declamation in <strong>the</strong> Welsh folk tradition is stillto be heard in canu’r pwnc ‘singing <strong>the</strong> text’. As now practiced in sou<strong>the</strong>rn Wales, <strong>the</strong>tradition is connected with reciting biblical scriptures at catechismal festivals, whichbecame prevalent in <strong>the</strong> early 1800s. The style of sung recitation may, however, be mucholder. In a typical example, a passage from <strong>the</strong> Bible is announced, and <strong>the</strong> precentorsounds <strong>the</strong> note. One group enters immediately on <strong>the</strong> same note, a second part comes inat a fifth above, and <strong>the</strong> two parts chant toge<strong>the</strong>r at that interval. The rhythm of <strong>the</strong> chantis clear, <strong>the</strong> tone firm and ra<strong>the</strong>r staccato, <strong>the</strong> diction clear. Phrasing is according to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!