who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...
who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ... who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...
102scales. Instead, in Georgia they are based mostly on the repetition of five-note scale units(pentachords) or four-note units (tetrachords). Tetrachordal (four note), or fourth diatonicsystems of the scales are very well known from ancient musical manuscripts from ancientGreece and the Arabian world, but of the discovery that the scale system was based onfive notes (pentachords), or “fifths diatonic scales” was crucial for a correctunderstanding of Georgian traditional and medieval professional polyphony. Let uscompare these three systems of scales: (1) eight, (2) fifths, and (3) fourth systems:Fig. 6. Scales of eight, fifths and fourth diatonicAccording to the intrinsic nature of the scales and intervals, out of these three socalled“perfect” intervals (eight, fourth, fifth) only one can remain perfect in any systemof scale. If the musical style is based on the eight (octave) diatonic system, only eightsare always perfect, in the fourth diatonic system only fourths are always perfect, and inthe fifths diatonic only fifths are always perfect. In the eight diatonic system augmentedfourth and diminished fifth are present, in the fifths diatonic system both fourth and eightare sometimes augmented (e.g., see C-F# and C-C#), and in fourth diatonic system bothfifths and octave are sometimes diminished (e.g., see B-F, E-Bflat, or B-Bflat, E-Eflatand A-Aflat).All our music education is firmly based on octave scales (even the name of thenotes and keys on the piano ar e based on octave scales, as we use only seven notes, andthe eighth note is considered to be the same note as the first one (remember seven notesfrom s chool music lessons: A,B,C,D,E,F,G and then again A,B,C,D,E,F,G etc). If wewere to use only “fourth” scale systems, we would have to learn only three notes: A, B,C, and again A,B,C (as the fourth note would be the same as the first one). In fifthsscales, accordingly, we would have a string of A,B,C,D, and again A,B,C,D (the fifthsnote being the same as the first one).These three types of scales are interestingly linked with different styles of musicin different major regions of the world. To generalize, we may say that “fourth” (ortetrachordal) scales are more prominent in Middle Eastern monophonic traditions. Inthese traditions the interval of the fourth is paramount and this is clear from ancientGreek and medieval Arabic musical theoretical writings.The “fifth” (or pentachordal) scales seem to be more prominent in polyphonictraditions. At least, this scale system is obvious in such widely separated polyphoniccultures as Georgian and Icelandic (we’ll discuss Icelandic music later in this chapter).
103In Georgian traditional polyphonic music the dominant scale system is the “FifthDiatonic Scale”. This scale dominates in all branches of western Georgian music, and inmost of the musical genres of eastern Georgia as well. In eastern Georgian “long” tablesongs the presence of this scale is obvious only under the central tone (pedal drone)(Gogotishvili, 2003).The “Fourth Diatonic Scale” system in Georgia is more regionally restricted. Inits pure form it exists only in solo monophonic working songs of eastern Georgia. Inpolyphonic songs it exists in “long” table songs of eastern Georgia, but only above thecentral tone (pedal drone). Therefore, eastern Georgian table songs have a veryinteresting mixture of different – “fourth” and “fifths” - scale systems, “working” aboveand below the tonal centre (tonal centre in these songs is expressed by the pedal drone).Melody in polyphonyMelody is popularly known as the “soul of the music”. We may have all heardcomplaints how the music is losing the beauty of the melody, or even worse – losing themelody per se.Analyzing Georgian traditional polyphonic songs, I came to a very strange (forme, and schocking for some of my Georgian colleagues) conclusion, that Georgianpolyphonic songs are not built around the “main melody” of a song. Even such brilliantsongs as “Chakrulo” or “Khasanbegoura” are not built around the main melody. That’swhy, for example, you cannot sing the melody of “Chakrulo”. The musical textureconsists of more than one melodic line, and none of them carries the important functionof being the main melody of a song. Georgian polyphonic songs are usually built onrelatively short musical phrases that can be the same in many different songs. Of course,there are Georgian songs that have their own distinct melodies (to name only a few:“Chela”, “Imeretian Rider’s Song”, or “Iavnana”), but the majority of the most complexpolyphonic songs have no one leading melody. The song is usually a combination of allparts and not the one leading melody accompanied by other parts. The combination ofthese three parts represent the “soul of music” in Georgian polyphonic music. I guess afew representatives of other polyphonic cultures would agree that in their cultures alsothere is no such thing as a “main melody of a song”, and rather that the combination of allparts delivers the main musical idea of a song.Unlike polyphonic traditions, in monophonic cultures the melodic line of a song isusually strictly personalized and represents the very soul of the music.Singing men and singing womenGender differences are one of the great subjects of traditional music (and not onlymusic). The subject is so vast that at some point I was thinking not to tackle this subjectin this book at all. (As a matter of fact, as I am writing this text, in another study NinoTsitsishvili is working on a book mainly dedicated to this incredibly interesting andimportant subject in Georgian music). At the same time, to avoid this theme completelywould not be fair. At least, we should remember that Alan Lomax wrote about theincredible importance of women’s singing and women’s role in society for the origins ofcohesive group polyphonic singing in traditional societies, so it is obvious that we cannotavoid this question. So in just a few words I want to discuss this subject in regards toGeorgia.
- Page 52 and 53: Out of these five main types of Rus
- Page 54 and 55: 54heterophonic and octave forms of
- Page 56 and 57: 56Ex. 3. Abkhazia. (Akhobadze, Kort
- Page 58 and 59: 58Balkarians and KarachaevisThese t
- Page 60 and 61: 60Ossetian polyphony is based on th
- Page 62 and 63: 62Garakanidze, who conducted a shor
- Page 64 and 65: 64in the southern part of the settl
- Page 66 and 67: 66Almeeva noted the presence of the
- Page 68 and 69: 68UkraineRegarding polyphonic singi
- Page 70 and 71: 70200), the difference between dron
- Page 72 and 73: 72BelarusBelarus is a part of the
- Page 74 and 75: 74Besides the drone and heterophoni
- Page 76 and 77: 76of the feast traditions and long
- Page 78 and 79: 78East GeorgiaEast Georgia consists
- Page 80 and 81: 80Fig. 3. Modulation from G to G# t
- Page 82 and 83: 82Polyphonic singing traditions in
- Page 84 and 85: 84In this four-part section we can
- Page 86 and 87: 86Improvisation in western Georgian
- Page 88 and 89: 88During our 1999 fieldwork in Geor
- Page 90 and 91: 90Interestingly, as Anzor Erkomaish
- Page 92 and 93: 92Different western Georgian dialec
- Page 95 and 96: 95Ex. 37. Lile. Ritual song dedicat
- Page 97 and 98: 97David Shugliashvili, both eastern
- Page 99 and 100: 99Urban MusicThe urban singing styl
- Page 101: 101Ex. 42. Suliko. Urban love song.
- Page 105 and 106: 105BalkansThe Balkans are one of th
- Page 107 and 108: 107the tradition of polyphonic sing
- Page 109 and 110: 109It represents an interesting mix
- Page 111 and 112: 111Ex. 54. Bosnia and Herzegovina,
- Page 113 and 114: 113MacedoniaSpeaking about Macedoni
- Page 115 and 116: 115Ex. 59. Albania. Laberi style po
- Page 117 and 118: 117of fact, together with Romania,
- Page 119 and 120: 119countries of the Baltic region a
- Page 121 and 122: 121research about sutartines (Slavi
- Page 123 and 124: 123LatviaAnother Baltic country, La
- Page 125 and 126: 125Ex. 68. Estonia. Setu polyphony
- Page 127 and 128: 127Tbilisi State Conservatory in th
- Page 129 and 130: 129contracted this peculiarity of s
- Page 131 and 132: 131throughout medieval northern Eur
- Page 133 and 134: 133electronic media; and whether th
- Page 135 and 136: 135To complete the review of the Ce
- Page 137 and 138: 137(9) The singing style is harsh a
- Page 139 and 140: 139ItalyWith its internationally re
- Page 141 and 142: 141than 120 Sicilianvillages and it
- Page 143 and 144: 143Vocal Polyphony in AsiaAsia is b
- Page 145 and 146: 145music of Ancient Greece itself i
- Page 147 and 148: 147possible space of a second.” T
- Page 149 and 150: 149sources from the 5 th (Favstos B
- Page 151 and 152: 151polyphonic singing came from Taj
103In Georgian traditional polyphonic music <strong>the</strong> dominant scale system is <strong>the</strong> “FifthDiatonic Scale”. This scale dominates in all branches of western Georgian music, and inmost of <strong>the</strong> musical genres of eastern Georgia as well. In eastern Georgian “long” tablesongs <strong>the</strong> presence of this scale is obvious only under <strong>the</strong> central tone (pedal drone)(Gogotishvili, 2003).The “Fourth Diatonic Scale” system in Georgia is more regionally restricted. Inits pure form it exists only in solo monophonic working songs of eastern Georgia. Inpolyphonic songs it exists in “long” table songs of eastern Georgia, but only above <strong>the</strong>central tone (pedal drone). Therefore, eastern Georgian table songs have a veryinteresting mixture of different – “fourth” and “fifths” - scale systems, “working” aboveand below <strong>the</strong> tonal centre (tonal centre in <strong>the</strong>se songs is expressed by <strong>the</strong> pedal drone).Melody in polyphonyMelody is popularly known as <strong>the</strong> “soul of <strong>the</strong> music”. We may have all heardcomplaints how <strong>the</strong> music is losing <strong>the</strong> beauty of <strong>the</strong> melody, or even worse – losing <strong>the</strong>melody per se.Analyzing Georgian traditional polyphonic songs, I came to a very strange (forme, and schocking for some of my Georgian colleagues) conclusion, that Georgianpolyphonic songs are not built around <strong>the</strong> “main melody” of a song. Even such brilliantsongs as “Chakrulo” or “Khasanbegoura” are not built around <strong>the</strong> main melody. That’swhy, for example, you cannot sing <strong>the</strong> melody of “Chakrulo”. The musical textureconsists of more than one melodic line, and none of <strong>the</strong>m carries <strong>the</strong> important functionof being <strong>the</strong> main melody of a song. Georgian polyphonic songs are usually built onrelatively short musical phrases that can be <strong>the</strong> same in many different songs. Of course,<strong>the</strong>re are Georgian songs that have <strong>the</strong>ir own distinct melodies (to name only a few:“Chela”, “Imeretian Rider’s Song”, or “Iavnana”), but <strong>the</strong> majority of <strong>the</strong> most complexpolyphonic songs have no one leading melody. The song is usually a combination of allparts and not <strong>the</strong> one leading melody accompanied by o<strong>the</strong>r parts. The combination of<strong>the</strong>se three parts represent <strong>the</strong> “soul of music” in Georgian polyphonic music. I guess afew representatives of o<strong>the</strong>r polyphonic cultures would agree that in <strong>the</strong>ir cultures also<strong>the</strong>re is no such thing as a “main melody of a song”, and ra<strong>the</strong>r that <strong>the</strong> combination of allparts delivers <strong>the</strong> main musical idea of a song.Unlike polyphonic traditions, in monophonic cultures <strong>the</strong> melodic line of a song isusually strictly personalized and represents <strong>the</strong> very soul of <strong>the</strong> music.Singing men and singing womenGender differences are one of <strong>the</strong> great subjects of traditional music (and not onlymusic). The subject is so vast that at some point I was thinking not to tackle this subjectin this book at all. (As a matter of fact, as I am writing this text, in ano<strong>the</strong>r study NinoTsitsishvili is working on a book mainly dedicated to this incredibly interesting andimportant subject in Georgian music). At <strong>the</strong> same time, to avoid this <strong>the</strong>me completelywould not be fair. At least, we should remember that Alan Lomax wrote about <strong>the</strong>incredible importance of women’s singing and women’s role in society for <strong>the</strong> origins ofcohesive group polyphonic singing in traditional societies, so it is obvious that we cannotavoid this <strong>question</strong>. So in just a few words I want to discuss this subject in regards toGeorgia.