10.07.2015 Views

FEIR for Boitshepi Landfill Site .pdf - Zitholele.co.za

FEIR for Boitshepi Landfill Site .pdf - Zitholele.co.za

FEIR for Boitshepi Landfill Site .pdf - Zitholele.co.za

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

August 2010 40 8848The approval letter received from the GDARD from the S<strong>co</strong>ping Phase stated thatAlternative 3 (100 metre buffer) was the preferred alternative, and at that stage alternative 3would allow <strong>for</strong> an additional 3 years airspace. This is no longer the situation and the threealternatives have been re-evaluated as follows:• Alternative 1: Extension of the waste disposal site footprint with a 0 metre buffer zone(no distance between waste disposal site and surrounding land users), the site will havean additional 3,221,113 m³ of airspace available with an additional estimated lifespan ofapproximately 8 years;• Alternative 2: Extension of the waste disposal site footprint with a 50 metre buffer zoneThe site would gain an extra 2,576,113 m³ of airspace and have an additional lifespan ofapproximately 6-7 years; and• Alternative 3: Extension of the waste disposal site footprint with a 100 metre buffer zone.An addition of 710,475 m³ airspace would be available and the expected additional life ofthe waste would be approximately 1-2 years.Alternative 3 initially seemed viable and preferable, with the smallest footprint <strong>for</strong> theproposed extension as an intermediate solution prior to the new waste disposal beingestablished. However, on evaluation of the recent calculations it is evident that thisalternative is no longer feasible since it will not ac<strong>co</strong>mmodate the disposal requirements <strong>for</strong>the area until the new site is <strong>co</strong>mmissioned and it is there<strong>for</strong>e no longer the preferredalternative but is fatally flawed. Regardless of this fatal flaw it is included in the impactassessment <strong>for</strong> <strong>co</strong>nsistency and in<strong>for</strong>mation purposes.The three alternatives are illustrated in Figure 10.ZITHOLELE CONSULTING

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!