FEIR for Boitshepi Landfill Site .pdf - Zitholele.co.za
FEIR for Boitshepi Landfill Site .pdf - Zitholele.co.za FEIR for Boitshepi Landfill Site .pdf - Zitholele.co.za
August 2010 29 88485 PROJECT DESCRIPTION5.1 LocationThe ELM consists of two main town centres, namely Vereeniging and Vanderbijlpark withSasolburg 10 km to the south, across the provincial boundary. The Boitshepi Waste DisposalSite is located in Vanderbijlpark. The site is situated to the east of Boipatong and to the westof Tshepiso, hence the name Boitshepi (Figure 1).5.2 Need for the extension of the Waste Disposal Site with view of closureThe Boitshepi Waste Disposal Site is reaching capacity and as such needs to be extendedand ultimately closed. The Boitshepi Waste Disposal Site is the only site that canaccommodate the waste disposal needs in the ELM for the time being. The site receives anaverage of 20,000 to 25,000 tons of waste per month from local residences and industries.The site cannot be closed until a new site has been authorised and licensed to meet thewaste disposal needs for the area. Kwezi V3 Engineers (KV3) in association with MasakheIsizwe Engineers (Pty) Ltd were appointed by the ELM on 12 February 2008 (3 yearcontract) to site, obtain EA, design, establish and license a new GLB + waste disposal site inthe ELM. Once operational, this new site will replace the Boitshepi Waste Disposal Site.5.3 Components for a Waste Disposal SiteThe following components of the waste disposal site were taken into considerationthroughout this EIA and the design of the site:• The lifespan of the site• Footprint of the facility (ground space);• Height of the facility (airspace);• Type of waste to be disposed as well as the volumes (waste stream analysis);• Geotechnical, hydrogeological conditions and liner design; and• Capping of the site.Lifespan of the facilityThe lifespan of the facility will be linked to the buffer zone alternative to be approved and isdependent on the new waste disposal site being established. It is estimated that the site willrequire at least an additional 3 years of operations.Footprint of the facilityThe existing waste disposal site has footprint of approximately 10 ha. The new facilityfootprint will depend on the alternative approved. The additional footprint will range between12 (0 metre buffer) and 3.5 ha (100 metre buffer).ZITHOLELE CONSULTING
August 2010 30 8848The current use of the land adjacent to the waste disposal site and the property on which it issituated is of industrial, agricultural and a wetland. Major towns within the region areVereeniging (located to the north east of the site) Vanderbijlpark (south west of the site),Sasolburg (south of the site) and Meyerton (north east of the site). There are currentlyapproximately 500 salvagers on site. These salvagers depend on the Boitshepi WasteDisposal Site for their livelihood. The majority of the salvagers live in the ‘informalsettlements’ of Tshepiso (east of the site), Boipatong (west of the site), Bophelong (north ofthe site), Evaton (north of the site), Orange Farm, Sebokeng (north of the site), Sharpeville(east of the site) and Zamdela.The Vaal Triangle encompasses a mixture of commercial, agricultural, and residential landuse activities, all within close proximity to one another. Vanderbijlpark is home toVanderbijlpark Steel (previously part of ISCOR (Iron and Steel Corporation), now part of theglobal company Arcelor Mittal. Other Industrial activities within this region include coal-firedpower stations, chemical factories, petrochemical plants, metallurgical plants and multiplesmall industries.Height of the facilityThe present highest point of the waste disposal site is 1496 m above sea level. Theextension will be designed to this height across the approved footprint.Geotechnical Conditions and Foundation DesignThe current site is situated in an area dominated by clay soils and is unlined. It isrecommended that the extension of the site be lined as per the Minimum Requirements(Figure 5). A geotechnical investigation was undertaken (Appendix C4) in order to establishwhether the extension / new site can be constructed on the geological conditions that prevailon site. This in turn influenced the foundation design of the disposal facility.Figure 5: Waste Disposal Site Liner for a GLB + site as per the Minimum Requirements.ZITHOLELE CONSULTING
- Page 1: August 2010Authorisation PhaseENVIR
- Page 4: August 2010 iii 8848consultation wi
- Page 8 and 9: August 2010 vii 8848GNRGPSHHDIH:hH:
- Page 10 and 11: August 2010 ix 8848SECTIONTABLE OF
- Page 12 and 13: August 2010 xi 8848LIST OF FIGURESF
- Page 14 and 15: August 2010 xiii 8848Table 31: Impa
- Page 16 and 17: August 2010 1 88481 INTRODUCTIONAnt
- Page 18 and 19: August 2010 3 8848Figure 1: Locatio
- Page 20 and 21: August 2010 5 88481.5 The Project T
- Page 22 and 23: August 2010 7 8848EAP Contact Detai
- Page 24 and 25: August 2010 9 88482 LEGAL REQUIREME
- Page 26 and 27: August 2010 11 8848On 1 May 2009, N
- Page 28 and 29: August 2010 13 8848• The role of
- Page 30 and 31: August 2010 15 8848• To provide a
- Page 32 and 33: August 2010 17 8848• Lay down gen
- Page 34 and 35: August 2010 19 8848Application Form
- Page 36 and 37: August 2010 21 8848APPLICATION /REG
- Page 38 and 39: August 2010 23 8848were received as
- Page 40 and 41: August 2010 25 8848• A descriptio
- Page 42 and 43: August 2010 27 8848(KV3 Engineers a
- Page 46 and 47: August 2010 31 8848Capping of the W
- Page 48 and 49: August 2010 33 88485.6 Overall EIA
- Page 50 and 51: August 2010 35 8848Construction of
- Page 52 and 53: August 2010 37 8848There are differ
- Page 54 and 55: August 2010 39 88486 TECHNOLOGY REV
- Page 56 and 57: August 2010 418848Figure 10: Boitsh
- Page 58 and 59: August 2010 4388487 BASELINE RECEIV
- Page 60 and 61: August 2010 458848• Soil depth;
- Page 62 and 63: 47August 2010 8848Figure 12: Soil T
- Page 64 and 65: August 2010 4988487.1.3 Drainage Fe
- Page 66 and 67: August 2010 518848Figure 15: Upper
- Page 68 and 69: 53August 2010 8848Figure 16: Topogr
- Page 70 and 71: August 2010 558848Soweto Highveld G
- Page 72 and 73: August 2010 578848Figure 18: Alien
- Page 74 and 75: 59August 2010 8848Species ListThe f
- Page 76 and 77: 61August 2010 8848Common Name Scien
- Page 78 and 79: 63August 2010 8848five decades ago
- Page 80 and 81: 65August 2010 8848steel industry, I
- Page 82 and 83: 67August 2010 88488 WASTE LICENSE A
- Page 84 and 85: 69August 2010 8848Waste disposal si
- Page 86 and 87: 71August 2010 8848Table 13 below il
- Page 88 and 89: 73August 2010 8848continue to monit
- Page 90 and 91: 75August 2010 88489 WASTE DISPOSAL
- Page 92 and 93: 77August 2010 88489.2.1 Extension o
August 2010 30 8848The current use of the land adjacent to the waste disposal site and the property on which it issituated is of industrial, agricultural and a wetland. Major towns within the region areVereeniging (located to the north east of the site) Vanderbijlpark (south west of the site),Sasolburg (south of the site) and Meyerton (north east of the site). There are currentlyapproximately 500 salvagers on site. These salvagers depend on the <strong>Boitshepi</strong> WasteDisposal <strong>Site</strong> <strong>for</strong> their livelihood. The majority of the salvagers live in the ‘in<strong>for</strong>malsettlements’ of Tshepiso (east of the site), Boipatong (west of the site), Bophelong (north ofthe site), Evaton (north of the site), Orange Farm, Sebokeng (north of the site), Sharpeville(east of the site) and Zamdela.The Vaal Triangle en<strong>co</strong>mpasses a mixture of <strong>co</strong>mmercial, agricultural, and residential landuse activities, all within close proximity to one another. Vanderbijlpark is home toVanderbijlpark Steel (previously part of ISCOR (Iron and Steel Corporation), now part of theglobal <strong>co</strong>mpany Arcelor Mittal. Other Industrial activities within this region include <strong>co</strong>al-firedpower stations, chemical factories, petrochemical plants, metallurgical plants and multiplesmall industries.Height of the facilityThe present highest point of the waste disposal site is 1496 m above sea level. Theextension will be designed to this height across the approved footprint.Geotechnical Conditions and Foundation DesignThe current site is situated in an area dominated by clay soils and is unlined. It isre<strong>co</strong>mmended that the extension of the site be lined as per the Minimum Requirements(Figure 5). A geotechnical investigation was undertaken (Appendix C4) in order to establishwhether the extension / new site can be <strong>co</strong>nstructed on the geological <strong>co</strong>nditions that prevailon site. This in turn influenced the foundation design of the disposal facility.Figure 5: Waste Disposal <strong>Site</strong> Liner <strong>for</strong> a GLB + site as per the Minimum Requirements.ZITHOLELE CONSULTING