10.07.2015 Views

FEIR for Boitshepi Landfill Site .pdf - Zitholele.co.za

FEIR for Boitshepi Landfill Site .pdf - Zitholele.co.za

FEIR for Boitshepi Landfill Site .pdf - Zitholele.co.za

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

August 2010 iii 8848<strong>co</strong>nsultation with all relevant stakeholders, as well as ongoing <strong>co</strong>mmunication andnetworking with I&APs throughout the duration of the project. Issues and <strong>co</strong>ncerns raisedduring the process were <strong>co</strong>mpiled in an Issues and Response Report (IRR), and includedwithin the S<strong>co</strong>ping Report, and this Final EIR.Alternatives ConsideredThree different design alternatives were <strong>co</strong>nsidered in the S<strong>co</strong>ping phase of the project(2008). The three alternatives were as follows:• Alternative 1: Extension of the waste disposal site footprint with a 0 metre buffer zone(no distance between waste disposal site and surrounding land users). The site will havean additional 3,651,113 m³ of airspace available with an additional estimated lifespan ofapproximately 9 years;• Alternative 2: Extension of the waste disposal site footprint with a 50 metre buffer zone.The site would gain an extra 3,006,113 m³ of airspace and have an additional lifespan ofapproximately 7-8 years; and• Alternative 3: Extension of the waste disposal site footprint with a 100 metre buffer zone.An addition of 1,140,475 m³ airspace would be available and the expected additional lifeof the waste would be approximately 3 years.The EIA <strong>for</strong> the proposed <strong>Boitshepi</strong> Waste Disposal <strong>Site</strong> was initiated in January 2007. Theproject has been on-going <strong>for</strong> almost three years and throughout this period waste has beenand <strong>co</strong>ntinues to be disposed of at <strong>Boitshepi</strong>. As a result some of the in<strong>for</strong>mation that hasbeen provided in earlier phases of this project is outdated and no longer applicable,there<strong>for</strong>e certain capacity and lifespan calculations are no longer <strong>co</strong>rrect and out byapproximately two years and required re-evaluation.The approval letter received from the GDARD from the S<strong>co</strong>ping Phase stated thatAlternative 3 (100 metre buffer) was the preferred alternative, and at that stage alternative 3would allow <strong>for</strong> an additional 3 years airspace. This is no longer the situation and the threealternatives have been re-evaluated as follows:• Alternative 1: Extension of the waste disposal site footprint with a 0 metre buffer zone(no distance between waste disposal site and surrounding land users), the site will havean additional 3,221,113 m³ of airspace available with an additional estimated lifespan ofapproximately 8 years;• Alternative 2: Extension of the waste disposal site footprint with a 50 metre buffer zoneThe site would gain an extra 2,576,113 m³ of airspace and have an additional lifespan ofapproximately 6-7 years; and• Alternative 3: Extension of the waste disposal site footprint with a 100 metre buffer zone.An addition of 710,475 m³ airspace would be available and the expected additional life ofthe waste would be approximately 1-2 years.ZITHOLELE CONSULTING

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!