FEIR for Boitshepi Landfill Site .pdf - Zitholele.co.za
FEIR for Boitshepi Landfill Site .pdf - Zitholele.co.za FEIR for Boitshepi Landfill Site .pdf - Zitholele.co.za
125August 2010 884811.3.3 GroundwaterInitial ImpactThe geohydrological impact will be of HIGH significance and will remain rated as aModerate impact as per the construction and operational phases.Additional ImpactDecommissioning and closure of the waste disposal site will involve covering the remainingwastes with impermeable liners satisfying the requirements of the DWA, followed by a layerof topsoil, vegetating the topsoil layer with hardy, but locally indigenous varieties of grassesand shrubs, demolishing unwanted infrastructure, removing contaminated soil, ripping andvegetating compacted areas. No further waste will be disposed on site. No water will be ableto infiltrate through the capping and percolate as leachate. Should water penetrate thecapping layer, it will be collected in the leachate collection system and be diverted to thesewer.The additional impact to groundwater is LOW impact and the site will be capped and noadditional waste will be accepted. It is therefore rated as above- Low impact that willdefinitely occur in the study area.Cumulative ImpactThe cumulative impact during the decommissioning phase remains as assessed above sincethe additional impact and the initial impact occur in the same area. Therefore the impactremains as Moderate impact.Mitigation MeasuresMitigation measures proposed during the construction phase for the liner and associatedinfrastructure on the site are applicable during the construction and rehabilitation for closure.All mitigation measures proposed for the liner are applicable for the capping construction.Residual ImpactWith proper execution of the above closure measures, the probability of an impact ongroundwater would be unlikely and therefore remains as assessed for the additional impact.ZITHOLELE CONSULTING
126August 2010 8848Table 46: Impact Rating Matrix for ground water during the decommissioning phase(Alternative 1-3).Type of Significance Spatial Temporal Probability RatingImpactInitial HIGH Local Long TermCouldhappen2.2- ModerateAdditional MODERATE Study site Long Term Unlikely 1.2 – LowCumulative HIGH Local Long TermCouldhappen2.2- ModerateResidual MODERATE Study site Long Term Unlikely 1.2 – Low11.3.4 Surface waterInitial ImpactThe initial impact will remain as assessed in the construction and operational phases, that isa Moderate impact.Additional ImpactDuring the closure / decommissioning and rehabilitation phase, construction activities willtake place for the capping liner. Once the capping layer is installed on site and the site hasbeen re-vegetated the potential for polluted run-off from site will be minimal. However duringthe construction of the capping layer the impact will remain as assessed in the constructionphase as a Moderate impact.Cumulative ImpactThe cumulative impact will remain as assessed in the additional phase, a Moderate impact.Mitigation measuresThe mitigation measures as proposed in the construction phase are applicable.Residual ImpactThe residual impact will remain as per the construction phase, a Low impact.Table 47: Impact Rating Matrix for surface water during the decommissioning phase(Alternative 1-3).Type of Significance Spatial Temporal Probability RatingImpactInitial HIGH Local Short –Term Could happen 2- ModerateAdditional HIGH Local Short –Term Could happen 2- ModerateCumulative HIGH Local Short –Term Could happen 2- ModerateResidual MODERATE Study site Short –Term Could happen 1.4- LowZITHOLELE CONSULTING
- Page 90 and 91: 75August 2010 88489 WASTE DISPOSAL
- Page 92 and 93: 77August 2010 88489.2.1 Extension o
- Page 94 and 95: 79August 2010 8848Figure 26: Site l
- Page 96 and 97: 81August 2010 884810 IMPACT ASSESSM
- Page 98 and 99: 83August 2010 884810.3 Duration Sca
- Page 100 and 101: 85August 2010 884811 IMPACT ASSESSM
- Page 102 and 103: 87August 2010 8848• Link the exte
- Page 104 and 105: 89August 2010 8848Type ofImpactCumu
- Page 106 and 107: 91August 2010 8848Figure 28: Piezom
- Page 108 and 109: 93August 2010 884811.1.4 Surface wa
- Page 110 and 111: 95August 2010 8848seepage of ground
- Page 112 and 113: 97August 2010 8848Table 29: Impact
- Page 114 and 115: 99August 2010 8848Table 30: Impact
- Page 116 and 117: 101August 2010 8848• As a minimum
- Page 118 and 119: 103August 2010 8848Table 32: Impact
- Page 120 and 121: 105August 2010 8848material. Not on
- Page 122 and 123: 107August 2010 8848Safety• Access
- Page 124 and 125: 109August 2010 8848Type ofImpactCum
- Page 126 and 127: 111August 2010 884811.2.2 Topograph
- Page 128 and 129: 113August 2010 8848It is understood
- Page 130 and 131: 115August 2010 8848Additional Impac
- Page 132 and 133: 117August 2010 8848Cumulative Impac
- Page 134 and 135: 119August 2010 8848Additional Impac
- Page 136 and 137: 121August 2010 8848TrafficDuring th
- Page 138 and 139: 123August 2010 884811.3 Decommissio
- Page 142 and 143: 127August 2010 884811.3.5 Geotechni
- Page 144 and 145: 129August 2010 8848Additional Impac
- Page 146 and 147: 131August 2010 8848Additional Impac
- Page 148 and 149: 133August 2010 8848Table 53: Impact
- Page 150 and 151: 135August 2010 884812.1.1 Preferred
- Page 152: August 2010 137884813 CONCLUSION AN
125August 2010 884811.3.3 GroundwaterInitial ImpactThe geohydrological impact will be of HIGH significance and will remain rated as aModerate impact as per the <strong>co</strong>nstruction and operational phases.Additional ImpactDe<strong>co</strong>mmissioning and closure of the waste disposal site will involve <strong>co</strong>vering the remainingwastes with impermeable liners satisfying the requirements of the DWA, followed by a layerof topsoil, vegetating the topsoil layer with hardy, but locally indigenous varieties of grassesand shrubs, demolishing unwanted infrastructure, removing <strong>co</strong>ntaminated soil, ripping andvegetating <strong>co</strong>mpacted areas. No further waste will be disposed on site. No water will be ableto infiltrate through the capping and per<strong>co</strong>late as leachate. Should water penetrate thecapping layer, it will be <strong>co</strong>llected in the leachate <strong>co</strong>llection system and be diverted to thesewer.The additional impact to groundwater is LOW impact and the site will be capped and noadditional waste will be accepted. It is there<strong>for</strong>e rated as above- Low impact that willdefinitely occur in the study area.Cumulative ImpactThe cumulative impact during the de<strong>co</strong>mmissioning phase remains as assessed above sincethe additional impact and the initial impact occur in the same area. There<strong>for</strong>e the impactremains as Moderate impact.Mitigation MeasuresMitigation measures proposed during the <strong>co</strong>nstruction phase <strong>for</strong> the liner and associatedinfrastructure on the site are applicable during the <strong>co</strong>nstruction and rehabilitation <strong>for</strong> closure.All mitigation measures proposed <strong>for</strong> the liner are applicable <strong>for</strong> the capping <strong>co</strong>nstruction.Residual ImpactWith proper execution of the above closure measures, the probability of an impact ongroundwater would be unlikely and there<strong>for</strong>e remains as assessed <strong>for</strong> the additional impact.ZITHOLELE CONSULTING