FEIR for Boitshepi Landfill Site .pdf - Zitholele.co.za
FEIR for Boitshepi Landfill Site .pdf - Zitholele.co.za FEIR for Boitshepi Landfill Site .pdf - Zitholele.co.za
111August 2010 884811.2.2 TopographyInitial ImpactThe initial impact to topography is a MODERATE negative impact which will occur in thestudy area and will be permanent. This impact is occurring and as such is rated as a Highimpact as in the construction phase.Additional ImpactThe additional impact remains as assessed in the construction phase.Cumulative ImpactThe cumulative impact during the operational phase remains as assessed above since theadditional impact and the initial impact occur in the same area. Therefore the impact remainsas High impact.Mitigation MeasuresThe change in topography is essential for the proper functioning of the proposed BoitshepiWaste Disposal Site and no mitigation is required.Residual ImpactDue to the fact that the change for the proposed extension is essential, and no mitigationmeasure is required, the residual impact without the implementation of the mitigationmeasures will remain as High impact.Table 35: Impact Rating Matrix for topography during the operational phase(Alternative 1-3).InitialType ofImpactAdditionalCumulativeResidualAlternative Significance Spatial Temporal Probability Rating1-31 and 231-31-3MODERATELOWLOWMODERATEMODERATEStudysiteIsolatedsiteIsolatedsitesStudysiteStudysitePermanent Is Occurring 3.3.- HighPermanentWill occur2.6 –ModeratePermanent Very Likely 1.9 - LowPermanent Will occur 3.3- HighPermanent Will occur 3.3- HighZITHOLELE CONSULTING
112August 2010 884811.2.3 GroundwaterInitial ImpactThere is no evidence of significant groundwater contamination emanating from the site,although it is noted that BH4A has elevated TDS. During operational phase, the groundwatermanagement systems would have been installed, and therefore, there will be a reduction inthe impact of groundwater.During operational phase, the following would have been installed for the operation of thewaste disposal site, leachate collection system which will be equipped with suitable drains orcollection pipes that direct the gravity flow of leachate or leakage to defined collection pointsor sumps from which it can be collected for treatment and leakage detection systemconstructed to intercept any leachate that may pass the barrier of the liner. This leakage isthen directed to separate leakage collection sumps, where the quantity and quality can bemonitored and from which accumulated leakage can be removed or passed through to thesewer system. The potential for ground water contamination for the proposed waste disposalsite will be MODERATE.Additional ImpactThe additional impact during the operational phase remains as assessed Therefore theimpact remains as Moderate impact.Cumulative ImpactThe cumulative impact during the operational phase remains as assessed above since theadditional impact and the initial impact occur in the same area. Therefore the impact remainsas Moderate impact.Mitigation MeasuresRegular (six-monthly) sampling of groundwater levels and quality should be conducted toassess whether seepage/leaching from the proposed Boitshepi Waste Disposal Site isimpacting on the groundwater.In the event of such impacts being identified, appropriate engineering interventions must bedevised and implemented.It is recommended that any extension, including a liner system, is restricted to the areaconfirmed to be underlain by clay, i.e., the southern area.ZITHOLELE CONSULTING
- Page 76 and 77: 61August 2010 8848Common Name Scien
- Page 78 and 79: 63August 2010 8848five decades ago
- Page 80 and 81: 65August 2010 8848steel industry, I
- Page 82 and 83: 67August 2010 88488 WASTE LICENSE A
- Page 84 and 85: 69August 2010 8848Waste disposal si
- Page 86 and 87: 71August 2010 8848Table 13 below il
- Page 88 and 89: 73August 2010 8848continue to monit
- Page 90 and 91: 75August 2010 88489 WASTE DISPOSAL
- Page 92 and 93: 77August 2010 88489.2.1 Extension o
- Page 94 and 95: 79August 2010 8848Figure 26: Site l
- Page 96 and 97: 81August 2010 884810 IMPACT ASSESSM
- Page 98 and 99: 83August 2010 884810.3 Duration Sca
- Page 100 and 101: 85August 2010 884811 IMPACT ASSESSM
- Page 102 and 103: 87August 2010 8848• Link the exte
- Page 104 and 105: 89August 2010 8848Type ofImpactCumu
- Page 106 and 107: 91August 2010 8848Figure 28: Piezom
- Page 108 and 109: 93August 2010 884811.1.4 Surface wa
- Page 110 and 111: 95August 2010 8848seepage of ground
- Page 112 and 113: 97August 2010 8848Table 29: Impact
- Page 114 and 115: 99August 2010 8848Table 30: Impact
- Page 116 and 117: 101August 2010 8848• As a minimum
- Page 118 and 119: 103August 2010 8848Table 32: Impact
- Page 120 and 121: 105August 2010 8848material. Not on
- Page 122 and 123: 107August 2010 8848Safety• Access
- Page 124 and 125: 109August 2010 8848Type ofImpactCum
- Page 128 and 129: 113August 2010 8848It is understood
- Page 130 and 131: 115August 2010 8848Additional Impac
- Page 132 and 133: 117August 2010 8848Cumulative Impac
- Page 134 and 135: 119August 2010 8848Additional Impac
- Page 136 and 137: 121August 2010 8848TrafficDuring th
- Page 138 and 139: 123August 2010 884811.3 Decommissio
- Page 140 and 141: 125August 2010 884811.3.3 Groundwat
- Page 142 and 143: 127August 2010 884811.3.5 Geotechni
- Page 144 and 145: 129August 2010 8848Additional Impac
- Page 146 and 147: 131August 2010 8848Additional Impac
- Page 148 and 149: 133August 2010 8848Table 53: Impact
- Page 150 and 151: 135August 2010 884812.1.1 Preferred
- Page 152: August 2010 137884813 CONCLUSION AN
112August 2010 884811.2.3 GroundwaterInitial ImpactThere is no evidence of significant groundwater <strong>co</strong>ntamination emanating from the site,although it is noted that BH4A has elevated TDS. During operational phase, the groundwatermanagement systems would have been installed, and there<strong>for</strong>e, there will be a reduction inthe impact of groundwater.During operational phase, the following would have been installed <strong>for</strong> the operation of thewaste disposal site, leachate <strong>co</strong>llection system which will be equipped with suitable drains or<strong>co</strong>llection pipes that direct the gravity flow of leachate or leakage to defined <strong>co</strong>llection pointsor sumps from which it can be <strong>co</strong>llected <strong>for</strong> treatment and leakage detection system<strong>co</strong>nstructed to intercept any leachate that may pass the barrier of the liner. This leakage isthen directed to separate leakage <strong>co</strong>llection sumps, where the quantity and quality can bemonitored and from which accumulated leakage can be removed or passed through to thesewer system. The potential <strong>for</strong> ground water <strong>co</strong>ntamination <strong>for</strong> the proposed waste disposalsite will be MODERATE.Additional ImpactThe additional impact during the operational phase remains as assessed There<strong>for</strong>e theimpact remains as Moderate impact.Cumulative ImpactThe cumulative impact during the operational phase remains as assessed above since theadditional impact and the initial impact occur in the same area. There<strong>for</strong>e the impact remainsas Moderate impact.Mitigation MeasuresRegular (six-monthly) sampling of groundwater levels and quality should be <strong>co</strong>nducted toassess whether seepage/leaching from the proposed <strong>Boitshepi</strong> Waste Disposal <strong>Site</strong> isimpacting on the groundwater.In the event of such impacts being identified, appropriate engineering interventions must bedevised and implemented.It is re<strong>co</strong>mmended that any extension, including a liner system, is restricted to the area<strong>co</strong>nfirmed to be underlain by clay, i.e., the southern area.ZITHOLELE CONSULTING