10.07.2015 Views

Catalysis of Organic..

Catalysis of Organic..

Catalysis of Organic..

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

482 Reductive AlkylationSince the preparation <strong>of</strong> a catalyst can be a complex process involving a number <strong>of</strong>variables, a thorough examination <strong>of</strong> all these variables would involve preparation <strong>of</strong>hundreds <strong>of</strong> catalysts. Platinum loading was a natural choice as one <strong>of</strong> the variables.It is well known that acids catalyze the formation <strong>of</strong> imine (2,4). It is also knownthat treatment <strong>of</strong> carbon with acids lead to the formation <strong>of</strong> acidic surface groups,hence pH during catalyst preparation was chosen as another variable (5). In the case<strong>of</strong> reductive alkylation, Thakur et. al. (6) showed that the reaction rate increases withsulfur loading therefore, sulfur loading was chosen as the third variable. Table 1shows the range <strong>of</strong> values for each <strong>of</strong> the chosen parameters.Experimental SectionReactions were carried out in liquid phase in a well-stirred (1000 rpm) high-pressurereactor (Parr Instruments, 300 mL) at 30 bar and 150°C. The reaction mixtureconsisted <strong>of</strong> 61 g <strong>of</strong> ADPA (Acros Chemicals), 53 g MIBK (Acros Chemicals) and370 mg <strong>of</strong> catalyst. The test procedures used here is similar to that described earlierby Bartels et al. (7). The reactor was operated at a constant pressure with the liquidphase in batch mode and the hydrogen fed in at a rate proportional to itsconsumption. The reaction was monitored by hydrogen uptake and the product yieldwas determined from gas chromatographic (Agilent Technologies, 6890N) analysis.The catalysts were commercial catalysts from Degussa with Pt-loading from1%-5%, S-loading varied between 0.1 and 0.5%. The pH <strong>of</strong> the catalyst duringpreparation was varied from 2-6. The dispersion <strong>of</strong> Pt was 52+/-5% for all thecatalysts tested.Results and DiscussionThe reactions were conducted according to a two factorial design with threevariables, which contains experimental points at the edges and the center <strong>of</strong> a facecenteredcube leading to 9 different experiments. Typically, the experiment at thecenter point is conducted at least 3 times to add degrees <strong>of</strong> freedom that allow theestimation <strong>of</strong> experimental error. Hence a total <strong>of</strong> 11 experiments are needed topredict the reaction rate within the parameter space. The parameter space for thecatalysts to be prepared is shown in columns 2-4 in Table 1.The reactions were conducted in the liquid phase at conditions described in theexperimental section. Test reactions were conducted to establish that the reactionswere kinetically limited. In cases where the rate <strong>of</strong> reaction was >5 mmol/(g*min),the selectivity to 6-PPD was >97% and the yield <strong>of</strong> 6-PPD was >96%. Hence, therate <strong>of</strong> hydrogen uptake was taken to be directly proportional to the formation <strong>of</strong> 6-PPD. This rate calculated at constant temperature and conversion was normalized tothe amount <strong>of</strong> catalyst used and is shown in column 6 <strong>of</strong> Table1. The two caseswhere Pt/S ratio was high (Run 3 & 4), hydrogenation <strong>of</strong> the ketone (MIBK) to thealcohol, methyl isobutyl carbinol (MIBC), was observed. In cases where the Pt/Sratio was low (Run 5 & 6), significant amounts <strong>of</strong> the imine was detected in the GC.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!