10.07.2015 Views

Catalysis of Organic..

Catalysis of Organic..

Catalysis of Organic..

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Bacchini et al . 1111 summarizes the main chemical features, surface area and distribution <strong>of</strong> V speciesas determined by chemical analysis, for catalysts employed in the present work.Sample eq was a fully equilibrated catalyst, while samples oxn were obtained bycontrolled oxidizing treatments <strong>of</strong> sample eq. The procedure adopted for thistreatment is also given in the Table; more severe conditions led to the generation <strong>of</strong> ahigher amount <strong>of</strong> V 5+ , while sample eq did not contain V 5+ at all.Table 1. Main chemical-physical features <strong>of</strong> catalysts before catalytic tests.Sample T <strong>of</strong> treatment in air (°C), time (h) S. area, m 2 /g n in V n+eq none 21 3.99ox1 450, 4 17 4.035ox2 500, 4 nd 4.052ox3 550, 4 14 4.47Figure 1 reports the corresponding UV-Vis Diffuse Reflectance spectra. Theband at 400 nm is relative to the CT between O 2- and V 5+ ; its intensity wasproportional to the amount <strong>of</strong> V 5+ . On the other hand, the intensity <strong>of</strong> the band at 900nm decreased, relative to a d-d transition for V 4+ in the vanadyl moiety. The XRDpattern <strong>of</strong> all samples, but ox3, corresponded to that <strong>of</strong> well-crystallized VPP; in thecase <strong>of</strong> sample ox3, additional reflections were due to the presence <strong>of</strong> δ-VOPO 4(JCPDS 37-0809). Therefore, the treatment <strong>of</strong> the VPP led to the generation <strong>of</strong>surface V 5+ in samples ox1 and ox2, and to the growth <strong>of</strong> crystalline VOPO 4 insample ox3.Table 2 compares the chemical analysis <strong>of</strong> the spent samples, downloaded afterreaction (samples eqsp and oxnsp); Figure 2 reports the corresponding UV-Vis DRspectra. It is shown that catalysts after reaction were more reduced than thecorresponding samples before reaction. Sample ox1sp was fully reduced, and alsocontained a low amount <strong>of</strong> V 3+ ; samples ox2sp and ox3sp, instead, yet retained somefraction <strong>of</strong> V 5+ . In electronic spectra, the intensity <strong>of</strong> the band at 400 nm was lowerthan in corresponding fresh samples (Figure 1); in the case <strong>of</strong> catalysts eqsp andox1sp, this band was absent. Therefore, the V 5+ species generated by the oxidizingtreatment <strong>of</strong> the VPP was not stable in the reaction environment, and wasprogressively reduced to V 4+ . In addition, a weak band at ≈ 500 nm, attributed to theV 3+ species (13), was present in samples eqsp and ox1sp.Figure 3 reports the amount <strong>of</strong> residual pyridine adsorbed on acid sites as afunction <strong>of</strong> temperature, for samples eqsp, ox1sp and ox3sp. Tests were carried outby adsorbing pyridine at room temperature, and by recording the FT-IR spectrumafter desorption at increasing temperatures. The amount <strong>of</strong> pyridine retained wasproportional to the total number <strong>of</strong> acid sites (Lewis + Brønsted). The Figure alsoshows the corresponding fraction <strong>of</strong> Lewis-type sites; the latter were the predominantacid sites in all samples. However, the residual amount <strong>of</strong> adsorbed pyridine afterevacuation at 400°C was very low; this indicates that the acid sites were <strong>of</strong> mediumstrength.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!