10.07.2015 Views

Crop yield response to water - Cra

Crop yield response to water - Cra

Crop yield response to water - Cra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In common with most crops, tissue expansion in grapevine is more sensitive <strong>to</strong> <strong>water</strong> deficit thans<strong>to</strong>matal regulation and gas exchange (Figure 5a-d). The effects of intensity and duration of<strong>water</strong> stress have been integrated in stress indices based, for example, on soil <strong>water</strong> status (Figure5a-d), plant-<strong>water</strong> status or canopy temperature (Figure 6). Box 2 summarizes techniques used<strong>to</strong> moni<strong>to</strong>r <strong>water</strong> status of vines, and below analyses <strong>yield</strong> <strong>response</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>water</strong> deficit from theperspective of production functions.Owing <strong>to</strong> the developmental programme of the plant and the definition of <strong>yield</strong> over twoconsecutive seasons, we need <strong>to</strong> consider the effects of <strong>water</strong> deficits in the previous season on thegrowth and <strong>yield</strong> in the current season. All possible <strong>response</strong>s have been reported, namely effectsFIGURE 5 Scheme for <strong>water</strong> management derived for Shiraz, Grenache and Mourvèdre in southernFrance. Relationships between fraction of transpirable soil <strong>water</strong> (FTSW) and the rate of(a) light-saturated net pho<strong>to</strong>synthesis; leaf emergence rate in (b) first-, or (c) second-order lateralbranches, and (d) final length of first-order lateral branches. Rates measured in <strong>water</strong>-deficittreatments are normalized with respect <strong>to</strong> well-<strong>water</strong>ed controls. The boxes (0 <strong>to</strong> 7) representeight classes with characteristic impairment of plant function by drying soil; for instance in (a)light saturated pho<strong>to</strong>synthesis is above 80 percent of controls in classes 0 <strong>to</strong> 3, and is reduced <strong>to</strong>60, 40, 20 and 7 percent of controls as soil dries from classes 4 <strong>to</strong> 7. The table shows recommendedlevel of <strong>water</strong> stress (FTSW class) for quality red wine production at different phenological stages.Adapted from Pellegrino et al. (2006).aAnnax(% of control)120100806040200 <strong>to</strong> 33 4567Phenophase(E-L stage)Budburst <strong>to</strong> flowering(4 <strong>to</strong> 23)FTSW class forquality red wineproduction0 <strong>to</strong> 1bLER I(% of control)01201008060402000 1 2345Flowering <strong>to</strong> bunch closure(23 <strong>to</strong> 32)Bunch closure <strong>to</strong> veraison(32 <strong>to</strong> 35)Veraison <strong>to</strong> harvest(35 <strong>to</strong> 38)235 <strong>to</strong> 66 77120cLER II(% of control)1008060402000123456dBLI(% of control)1201000180260402001.0 0.8 0.63456 70.4 0.2 0.0FTSWgrapevine 467

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!