10.07.2015 Views

Crop yield response to water - Cra

Crop yield response to water - Cra

Crop yield response to water - Cra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

environments, rainfall pulses and limited buffering capacity of soils drive marked wet-dry cycles.The frequency, duration and severity of the dry spells in these cycles are largely unpredictable.Owing <strong>to</strong> drying trends and reliability of quality wine supply required by globalized markets,supplemental irrigation is likely <strong>to</strong> increase even in these areas that have been traditionally rainfed.Figure 4 compares the plant <strong>water</strong> status of rainfed vines from contrasting climates and soils withina given region; examples from irrigated vines are also included. It is clear that irrigation stabilizespredawn leaf <strong>water</strong> potential at a level rarely found naturally over the growing season in theseareas, including the very cool climate regions of the Loire Valley in France and the Rheingau inGermany. Figure 4 also shows that the differences in <strong>water</strong> status between vineyards within eachof the regions could be larger than the differences in general <strong>water</strong> status between differentclimate zones. It is also clear that variation in <strong>water</strong> status during a particular season increasesfrom warm and dry climates <strong>to</strong> summer rainfall because of the irregularity of the frequency andintensity of summer precipitation in the latter.Growth and <strong>yield</strong><strong>Crop</strong> <strong>response</strong>s <strong>to</strong> <strong>water</strong> deficit depend on the intensity, duration and timing of stress. Intraspecificvariation has been reported for major traits related <strong>to</strong> the development, <strong>water</strong> and carboneconomy of grapevine including phenology, susceptibility <strong>to</strong> embolism, s<strong>to</strong>matal density ands<strong>to</strong>matal conductance in <strong>response</strong> <strong>to</strong> both soil <strong>water</strong> content and vapour pressure deficit, biomassper unit transpiration, dry mater partitioning, and roots<strong>to</strong>ck <strong>response</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>water</strong> deficit, salinity andsoil-borne diseases.466Figure 4 Seasonal courses of predawn leaf <strong>water</strong> potential from different vineyard sites in contrastingenvironments. Left panel is Syrah from two warm, dry areas in southern France: Pic St. Loup areanorth of Montpellier (Schultz, 2003) and Aude region (Winkel and Rambal, 1993). Central panelis Cabernet franc from vineyards with three contrasting soils in the cool, summery rainfall LoireValley of France (Morlat et al.,1992), the warm, summer rainfall St. Emilion region of France (vanLeeuwen and Seguin, 1994), Loire, sandy clay the warm, dry Napa Valley of California for an irrigated treatmentand a <strong>water</strong> deficit treatment Loire, sand after on deep veraison clay (Schultz and Matthews unpublished). Right panel isNapa Valley, irrigatedWhite Riesling from the cool, summer rainfall Rheingau region in Germany collected in 1999 (openNapa Valley, not irrigatedRheingau, shallow soilsymbol and dotted line) and 2002 (closed symbols); adapted from Gruber and Schultz (Gruber andpre-dawn leaf <strong>water</strong> potential (MPa)0.0-0.2-0.4-0.6-0.8-1.0-1.2-1.4Pic. Schultz, St. Loup, irrigated 2005). All treatments clay layerwere rainfed, unless otherwise indicated.Pic. St. Loup, calcareous soilAude, calcareous soilSyrahcrop <strong>yield</strong> <strong>response</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>water</strong>-0.4aSt. Emilion, sand onSt. Emilion, gravelyLoire, sand on sands<strong>to</strong>neCabernet francRheingau, deep loess soilRheingau, med. loamirrigatedRheingau, med. loamRieslingPic. St. Loup, calcareous soilLoire, sandy clayAude,Loire,calcareoussand on deepsoilclay -0.60.0Napa Valley, irrigatedNapa Valley, not irrigated Syrah-0.8St. Emilion, sand onPic. St. Loup, irrigated -0.2clay layer160 200 240 280 160 Pic. St. 200 Loup, calcareous 240 280 soil 160 St. 200 Emilion, 240 gravely 280 -1.0Aude, calcareous soilLoire, sand on sands<strong>to</strong>neday of year -0.40.0-1.2SyrahCabernet franc-0.6-0.2-1.4r potential (MPa)-0.6bawn leaf <strong>water</strong> potential (MPa)-0.8-1.0cpre-dawn leaf <strong>water</strong> potential (MPa)Pic. St. Loup, irrigated0.0-0.2-0.4Pic. St. Loup, irrigatedPic. St. Loup, calcareous soilAude, calcareous soilLoire, sandy clayLoire, sand on deep clayNapa Valley, irrigatedSyrahNapa Valley, not irrigatedSt. Emilion, sand onclay layerSt. Emilion, gravelyLoire, sand on sands<strong>to</strong>neRheingau, Cabernet shallow soil francRheingau, deep loess soilRheingau, med. loamirrigatedRheingau, med. loamRieslingLoire, sandy clayLoire, sand on deep clayNapa Valley, irrigatedNapa Valley, not irrigatedSt. Emilion, sand onclay layerSt. Emilion, gravelyLoire, sand on sands<strong>to</strong>neCabernet francRheingau, shallow soilRheingau, deep loess soilRheingau, med. loamirrigatedRheingau, med. loam160 200 240 280 160 200 240 280abcday of yearRiesling

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!