Crop yield response to water - Cra
Crop yield response to water - Cra Crop yield response to water - Cra
Figure 4Daily patterns of sunlit leaf net assimilation rate measured after harvest with IRGA in Summitsweet cherry trees. Trees were fully irrigated throughout the season.Net assimilation rate (µmol m -2 s -1 )161412108642harvest013 May 2 June 22 June 12 July 1 Aug. 21 Aug. 10 Sept. 30 Sept.Figure 5Estimated crop coefficients for mature sweet cherry trees grown in a vase training system undertwo different growing conditions (high vigour in squares and low vigour in rhomboids). Themidday intercepted radiation for the high vigour and low vigour orchards during midseason was0.54 and 0.45, respectively.Low vigourHigh vigour1.210.8Estimated Kc0.60.40.20March 15-...Apr. 1-15Apr. 16-30May 1-15May 16-31June 1-15June 16-30July 1-15July 16-31Aug. 1-15Aug. 16-31Sept. 1-15Sept. 16-30Oct. 1-15Oct. 16-31Nov. 1-15sweet CHERRY 453
Under certain growing conditions, stomata remain slightly closed at the end of the postharvestseason, even when the trees are not water stressed (Figure 3 – September conditions). This hasbeen found in cherry orchards growing under warm Mediterranean conditions. Since the cherrymarket in these regions sets pressure for the use of early ripening cultivars, the postharvestperiod may last more than four months. During this period, little growth is being accomplishedbecause tree growth is checked by the application of growth regulators. After harvest, leaf netphotosynthetic rates tend to decrease with time (Figure 4). Reductions in photosynthesis usuallycome with reductions in stomata aperture and consequently, the transpiration also declines withtime. This is referred in the physiology literature as photosynthetic down-regulation.Water UseAlthough some preliminary work on modelling cherry tree transpiration has been done recently(Antunez, 2006), specific reports on measurements of cherry ET c or K c values are lacking in theliterature. Cherry irrigation requirements could be approximated by using the informationdeveloped for peach trees (see Peach Section) where the K c is related to tree intercepted radiationat midday. An example of the seasonal evolution of K c is provided in Figure 5 where cherry treeintercepted radiation was measured every two weeks until mid-August. A steady decrease in K cis assumed after mid-August. This K c decline is due to a leaf die-back process, but also to thepreviously referred effect of the down-regulation of photosynthesis, which may already apparentby late July (Figure 5). Two different tree vigour conditions are considered in Figure 5, and theeffects on crop intercepted radiation and estimated K c is evident. Low vigour conditions hadnoticeable lower K c , resulting in a 18 percent reduction in annual water requirements for theconditions in the Ebro basin, Spain (Marsal, 2010). This emphasizes the need to adjust the K c valuesto the specific orchard conditions.Suggested RDI RegimesThe application of RDI is currently widespread in some regions along with the use of growthregulators. However RDI before harvest is rarely used because besides reducing fruit growthand fruit final size (Werenfels, 1967), it can also increase cracking if stress is relieved duringripening (Sekse, 1995). RDI is more commonly applied after harvest. The reason for the groweracceptance of using postharvest RDI is because it decreases tree internal shading and controlsexcessive vigour. However, deficit irrigation is often applied after harvest in the absence ofresearch-based recommendations. For instance, in certain areas irrigation is commonly reduceduntil visual leaf wilting without being aware of possible carryover effects during the followingseason. From the few research reports published it can be inferred that, under certain conditions,postharvest water deficits can negatively affect cherry quality the following season, withexcessive water stress exacerbating this problem. A study on postharvest RDI in New Star sweetcherry grown in the semi-arid climate of Catalonia, Spain found a significant linear relationshipbetween reduction in cherry firmness and soluble solids with the average midday stem-waterpotential experienced the previous postharvest season (Marsal, 2009). Another issue related tothe use of postharvest RDI is the possibility of applying excessive water stress and negativelyinfluencing fruit set and crop load in the next season, as it has been reported for peach andalmond. In a recent study on Summit cherry, a postharvest RDI treatment, receiving 50 percentof the water given to a Control treatment, reduced fruit set and crop load in the following454crop yield response to water
- Page 405 and 406: The postharvest period is important
- Page 407 and 408: the midday stem-water potential in
- Page 409 and 410: PHOTOPeach leaf appearance under th
- Page 411 and 412: FIGURE 5Relation between the crop c
- Page 413 and 414: In applying RDI strategies an impor
- Page 415: peach 407
- Page 418 and 419: Figure 1 Production trends of walnu
- Page 420: 1 100 mm, a team in California appl
- Page 423 and 424: Figure 1 Production trends for pist
- Page 425 and 426: There are two types of shoot growth
- Page 427 and 428: FIGURE 3Time course development of
- Page 429 and 430: Stage III was the most stress sensi
- Page 431: (see Chapter 4), as in other specie
- Page 434 and 435: Table 2 Suggested RDI strategies fo
- Page 437 and 438: Lead AuthorSCristos Xiloyannis(Univ
- Page 439 and 440: is completed within 20 days; therea
- Page 441 and 442: or peach. However, because fruit is
- Page 443 and 444: to a midday value varying between -
- Page 446 and 447: Lead AuthorRaúl Ferreyraand Gabrie
- Page 448 and 449: The most critical developmental per
- Page 450 and 451: Figure 4Effects of the level of app
- Page 453 and 454: Lead AuthorJordi Marsal(IRTA, Lleid
- Page 455: water stress should not be imposed
- Page 459 and 460: ReferencesAntunez A., Stockle, C. &
- Page 463 and 464: Lead AuthorSVictor O. Sadras(SARDI
- Page 465 and 466: Current season inflorescences becom
- Page 467 and 468: the actual timing of each critical
- Page 469 and 470: environments, rainfall pulses and l
- Page 471 and 472: Figure 6Yield reduction with increa
- Page 473 and 474: Table 3Yield and yield components o
- Page 475 and 476: Figure 9Wine quality score as a fun
- Page 477 and 478: Figure 11Wine attributes of Tempran
- Page 479 and 480: (McCarthy and Coombe, 1999), but ev
- Page 481 and 482: Figure 15Relative yield as a functi
- Page 484: Shiraz, Grenache and Mourvèdre in
- Page 487 and 488: Girona, J., Mata, M., del Campo, J.
- Page 491 and 492: Lead AuthorSCristos Xiloyannis(Univ
- Page 493 and 494: Figure 2Seasonal pattern of the lea
- Page 495 and 496: Figure 5Fraction of the exposed and
- Page 497 and 498: FIGURE 9Soil volume explored by roo
- Page 499 and 500: Water Requirements and IrrigationMa
- Page 501 and 502: 5. EpilogueThis publication, Irriga
- Page 503 and 504: operating systems (e.g., Linux, Uni
- Page 505: Crop yield response to waterAbstrac
Under certain growing conditions, s<strong>to</strong>mata remain slightly closed at the end of the postharvestseason, even when the trees are not <strong>water</strong> stressed (Figure 3 – September conditions). This hasbeen found in cherry orchards growing under warm Mediterranean conditions. Since the cherrymarket in these regions sets pressure for the use of early ripening cultivars, the postharvestperiod may last more than four months. During this period, little growth is being accomplishedbecause tree growth is checked by the application of growth regula<strong>to</strong>rs. After harvest, leaf netpho<strong>to</strong>synthetic rates tend <strong>to</strong> decrease with time (Figure 4). Reductions in pho<strong>to</strong>synthesis usuallycome with reductions in s<strong>to</strong>mata aperture and consequently, the transpiration also declines withtime. This is referred in the physiology literature as pho<strong>to</strong>synthetic down-regulation.Water UseAlthough some preliminary work on modelling cherry tree transpiration has been done recently(Antunez, 2006), specific reports on measurements of cherry ET c or K c values are lacking in theliterature. Cherry irrigation requirements could be approximated by using the informationdeveloped for peach trees (see Peach Section) where the K c is related <strong>to</strong> tree intercepted radiationat midday. An example of the seasonal evolution of K c is provided in Figure 5 where cherry treeintercepted radiation was measured every two weeks until mid-August. A steady decrease in K cis assumed after mid-August. This K c decline is due <strong>to</strong> a leaf die-back process, but also <strong>to</strong> thepreviously referred effect of the down-regulation of pho<strong>to</strong>synthesis, which may already apparentby late July (Figure 5). Two different tree vigour conditions are considered in Figure 5, and theeffects on crop intercepted radiation and estimated K c is evident. Low vigour conditions hadnoticeable lower K c , resulting in a 18 percent reduction in annual <strong>water</strong> requirements for theconditions in the Ebro basin, Spain (Marsal, 2010). This emphasizes the need <strong>to</strong> adjust the K c values<strong>to</strong> the specific orchard conditions.Suggested RDI RegimesThe application of RDI is currently widespread in some regions along with the use of growthregula<strong>to</strong>rs. However RDI before harvest is rarely used because besides reducing fruit growthand fruit final size (Werenfels, 1967), it can also increase cracking if stress is relieved duringripening (Sekse, 1995). RDI is more commonly applied after harvest. The reason for the groweracceptance of using postharvest RDI is because it decreases tree internal shading and controlsexcessive vigour. However, deficit irrigation is often applied after harvest in the absence ofresearch-based recommendations. For instance, in certain areas irrigation is commonly reduceduntil visual leaf wilting without being aware of possible carryover effects during the followingseason. From the few research reports published it can be inferred that, under certain conditions,postharvest <strong>water</strong> deficits can negatively affect cherry quality the following season, withexcessive <strong>water</strong> stress exacerbating this problem. A study on postharvest RDI in New Star sweetcherry grown in the semi-arid climate of Catalonia, Spain found a significant linear relationshipbetween reduction in cherry firmness and soluble solids with the average midday stem-<strong>water</strong>potential experienced the previous postharvest season (Marsal, 2009). Another issue related <strong>to</strong>the use of postharvest RDI is the possibility of applying excessive <strong>water</strong> stress and negativelyinfluencing fruit set and crop load in the next season, as it has been reported for peach andalmond. In a recent study on Summit cherry, a postharvest RDI treatment, receiving 50 percen<strong>to</strong>f the <strong>water</strong> given <strong>to</strong> a Control treatment, reduced fruit set and crop load in the following454crop <strong>yield</strong> <strong>response</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>water</strong>