Crop yield response to water - Cra
Crop yield response to water - Cra Crop yield response to water - Cra
Responses to Water DeficitsIn areas of winter and spring rainfall, water stress conditions rarely occur before harvest inearly cultivars, particularly when soils are deep and with high water-holding capacity. Theeffects of reduced soil water availability, as well as the level of stress experienced by plants,depend on the intensity and duration of the water deficit, and on the plant phenologicalstage. Generally in June, July and August (months with high evaporative demand) the effectsof water deficit are more evident.Apricots, like most stone fruit trees, are sensitive to water shortages during the entire fruitdevelopment period. The early stages of fruit growth are of great significance not only forfruit size but also for the accumulation of some phloem-immobile nutrients (e.g. calcium,Ca). About 85 percent of fruit Ca content at harvest is gained within the early four weeks ofdevelopment (Montanaro et al., 2010). Hence optimal soil water supply during these weeks isessential to avoid reduction of water (and nutrients) uptake.Water deficits during the later stages of fruit growth lead to smaller fruit at harvest. However,it has been reported that for the cv. Búlida, recovery from water stress (-1.0 MPa predawnleaf water potential (LWP)) during Stage II of fruit growth, induced a compensatory fruitgrowth rate during the final stages, which allowed the fruit to reach a similar diameter asfruit from fully irrigated plants (Torrecillas et al., 2000). In the same experiment, water deficitsapplied during Stages I and II that imposed mild to moderate stress from mid-March to mid-May (predawn LWP of -1.1 MPa) caused a yield decline of about 15 percent in the last threeyears of a four-year experiment. Surprisingly, this difference was not statistically significantfrom the yield of a fully irrigated control (predawn LWP of -0.4 MPa) (Torrecillas et al., 2000).For mature trees water deficits (-1.0 MPa predawn LWP) negatively affected trunk growthduring the drought period (Perez-Pastor et al., 2009). However, upon recovery of optimal soilwater condition trunk circumference may easily recover (Torrecillas et al., 2000).Water stress (-1.5 to -2.2 MPa of predawn LWP) occurring during the early postharvest period(~30 days after harvest), could have detrimental effects on the potential yield of the followingyear, particularly for early cultivars. This is because water deficits at this time negatively affectbud induction and the floral differentiation process, which happen in the early postharvestperiod.Water RequirementsThe water requirements for irrigation depend primarily on the annual water deficit of theenvironment, than on cultivar and yield target. For example, the amount of irrigation waterneeded to produce 1 kg of fruit in southern Italy, where the seasonal water deficit (ET o -rainfall)is around 850 mm/year, is about 160 litre (~30 tonne/ha yield). For the same cultivar, this valuedecreases to about 40 litre/kg in northern Italy (44°08’ N; 12°44’ E) where the seasonal waterdeficit is only around 160 mm/year.There have been very few measurements of the consumptive use (ET c ) of apricot trees. Cropcoefficients (K c ) for apricot orchards are similar to those of other stone fruit such as plumapricot 435
or peach. However, because fruit is harvested quite early, limited post harvest irrigation iscommon, which affects the reported K c values, sometimes much lower than the values thatmay be observed in orchards where the water supply is not limiting transpiration after harvest.Table 1 provides adjusted K c values for mature drip-irrigated apricot orchards based on anexperiment in southeastern Spain (37°52’ N; 1°25’ W) (Abrisqueta et al., 2001).Table 1Crop coefficients for mature apricot trees (soil was not tilled, trees were drip irrigated).Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct.0.4 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.0 0.85 0.7 0.5WATER PRODUCTION FUNCTIONBased on results from published experiments relating yield to different irrigation regimes forapricots (Torrecillas et al., 2000 and Perez-Pastor et al., 2009) and from our own experience, anSDI programme has been outlined in Table 2 and an RDI strategy in Figure 5. This programmereduces the seasonal applied water by 20 percent relative to a fully irrigated orchard, willdecrease irrigation water use without impacting negatively on yield.Table 2Recommended crop coefficients for a SDI strategy. Data obtained in Southern Italy(40 N; 16°38’ E; C. Xiloyannis, unpublished).Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct.0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.85 0.5 0.5 0.5Suggested RDI RegimesAs described above, apricot trees have some positive characteristics that help them face waterrestrictions and these can be used in RDI strategies. Moreover, shoot and fruit growth areseparated (Figure 4) in late cultivars. As for peach, this is highly relevant when adopting deficitirrigation strategies devoted to the control of vegetation without affecting fruit growth.However, the opportunity to reduce water application in Stage II is limited for apricots, inparticular in early cultivars where the duration of Stage II is quite limited.A regulated deficit irrigation strategy should avoid water deficits during the critical period ofhigh sensitivity to water stress (i.e. the whole fruit growth and the early postharvest period,around 30 days after harvest). After this period, based on the amount of water available in thesoil volume explored by roots, irrigation could start being reduced just after harvest. In thisway, the trees deplete water from the deep soil layers and gradually adjust their water statuswithout affecting bud induction and differentiation processes. It is recommended that in theearly 30-day period after harvest, the predawn Y leaf should not be below -0.7 MPa. After thisperiod, a reduction of about 50 percent of the ET c is a practicable deficit irrigation strategy(Figure 5). To avoid excessive tree water stress it is desirable to monitor tree water status(minimum predawn Y leaf should not be below a threshold of -1.30 MPa, which corresponds436crop yield response to water
- Page 390 and 391: out in Spain under more common grow
- Page 392 and 393: Figure 4Relationships between the p
- Page 394 and 395: Data in Figure 5 suggest that there
- Page 396 and 397: e saved, but this causes a reductio
- Page 398: pear 389
- Page 401 and 402: Figure 1 Production trends for peac
- Page 403 and 404: Figure 2bEvolution of vegetative (s
- Page 405 and 406: The postharvest period is important
- Page 407 and 408: the midday stem-water potential in
- Page 409 and 410: PHOTOPeach leaf appearance under th
- Page 411 and 412: FIGURE 5Relation between the crop c
- Page 413 and 414: In applying RDI strategies an impor
- Page 415: peach 407
- Page 418 and 419: Figure 1 Production trends of walnu
- Page 420: 1 100 mm, a team in California appl
- Page 423 and 424: Figure 1 Production trends for pist
- Page 425 and 426: There are two types of shoot growth
- Page 427 and 428: FIGURE 3Time course development of
- Page 429 and 430: Stage III was the most stress sensi
- Page 431: (see Chapter 4), as in other specie
- Page 434 and 435: Table 2 Suggested RDI strategies fo
- Page 437 and 438: Lead AuthorSCristos Xiloyannis(Univ
- Page 439: is completed within 20 days; therea
- Page 443 and 444: to a midday value varying between -
- Page 446 and 447: Lead AuthorRaúl Ferreyraand Gabrie
- Page 448 and 449: The most critical developmental per
- Page 450 and 451: Figure 4Effects of the level of app
- Page 453 and 454: Lead AuthorJordi Marsal(IRTA, Lleid
- Page 455 and 456: water stress should not be imposed
- Page 457 and 458: Under certain growing conditions, s
- Page 459 and 460: ReferencesAntunez A., Stockle, C. &
- Page 463 and 464: Lead AuthorSVictor O. Sadras(SARDI
- Page 465 and 466: Current season inflorescences becom
- Page 467 and 468: the actual timing of each critical
- Page 469 and 470: environments, rainfall pulses and l
- Page 471 and 472: Figure 6Yield reduction with increa
- Page 473 and 474: Table 3Yield and yield components o
- Page 475 and 476: Figure 9Wine quality score as a fun
- Page 477 and 478: Figure 11Wine attributes of Tempran
- Page 479 and 480: (McCarthy and Coombe, 1999), but ev
- Page 481 and 482: Figure 15Relative yield as a functi
- Page 484: Shiraz, Grenache and Mourvèdre in
- Page 487 and 488: Girona, J., Mata, M., del Campo, J.
or peach. However, because fruit is harvested quite early, limited post harvest irrigation iscommon, which affects the reported K c values, sometimes much lower than the values thatmay be observed in orchards where the <strong>water</strong> supply is not limiting transpiration after harvest.Table 1 provides adjusted K c values for mature drip-irrigated apricot orchards based on anexperiment in southeastern Spain (37°52’ N; 1°25’ W) (Abrisqueta et al., 2001).Table 1<strong>Crop</strong> coefficients for mature apricot trees (soil was not tilled, trees were drip irrigated).Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct.0.4 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.0 0.85 0.7 0.5WATER PRODUCTION FUNCTIONBased on results from published experiments relating <strong>yield</strong> <strong>to</strong> different irrigation regimes forapricots (Torrecillas et al., 2000 and Perez-Pas<strong>to</strong>r et al., 2009) and from our own experience, anSDI programme has been outlined in Table 2 and an RDI strategy in Figure 5. This programmereduces the seasonal applied <strong>water</strong> by 20 percent relative <strong>to</strong> a fully irrigated orchard, willdecrease irrigation <strong>water</strong> use without impacting negatively on <strong>yield</strong>.Table 2Recommended crop coefficients for a SDI strategy. Data obtained in Southern Italy(40 N; 16°38’ E; C. Xiloyannis, unpublished).Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct.0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.85 0.5 0.5 0.5Suggested RDI RegimesAs described above, apricot trees have some positive characteristics that help them face <strong>water</strong>restrictions and these can be used in RDI strategies. Moreover, shoot and fruit growth areseparated (Figure 4) in late cultivars. As for peach, this is highly relevant when adopting deficitirrigation strategies devoted <strong>to</strong> the control of vegetation without affecting fruit growth.However, the opportunity <strong>to</strong> reduce <strong>water</strong> application in Stage II is limited for apricots, inparticular in early cultivars where the duration of Stage II is quite limited.A regulated deficit irrigation strategy should avoid <strong>water</strong> deficits during the critical period ofhigh sensitivity <strong>to</strong> <strong>water</strong> stress (i.e. the whole fruit growth and the early postharvest period,around 30 days after harvest). After this period, based on the amount of <strong>water</strong> available in thesoil volume explored by roots, irrigation could start being reduced just after harvest. In thisway, the trees deplete <strong>water</strong> from the deep soil layers and gradually adjust their <strong>water</strong> statuswithout affecting bud induction and differentiation processes. It is recommended that in theearly 30-day period after harvest, the predawn Y leaf should not be below -0.7 MPa. After thisperiod, a reduction of about 50 percent of the ET c is a practicable deficit irrigation strategy(Figure 5). To avoid excessive tree <strong>water</strong> stress it is desirable <strong>to</strong> moni<strong>to</strong>r tree <strong>water</strong> status(minimum predawn Y leaf should not be below a threshold of -1.30 MPa, which corresponds436crop <strong>yield</strong> <strong>response</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>water</strong>