Crop yield response to water - Cra
Crop yield response to water - Cra Crop yield response to water - Cra
1 100 mm, a team in California applied 85 percent of ET c through April to mature cv. Chicotrees and then progressively lower percentages of ET c as the season progressed (25 percentwas the minimum from early July through the early September harvest) and no postharvestirrigation (Goldhamer et al., 1989). Fruit yields in the drought year were about 10 percentlower than the fully irrigated control (not statistically significant). However in the followingrecovery year, when full irrigation was applied to all trees, the drought year trees had about80 percent lower yields almost entirely the result of a lower fruit load. Yields returned to nearfull levels during the second recovery year (Goldhamer et al., 1990).It appears that walnut trees do not respond well to water deficits, regardless of the deficitirrigation strategy, in terms of nut yield. This is probably because of the high sensitivity ofshoot growth to water deficits and, in turn, to the heavy dependence of fruit load on theshoot growth of the previous year in walnuts.ReferencesFAO. 2011. FAOSTAT online database, available at link http://faostat.fao.org/. Accessed on December 2011.Fulton, A., Buchner, R., Little, C., Gilles, C., Grant, J., Lampinen, B., Schackel, K., Schwankl, L., Prichard, T. & Rivers,D. 2002. Relationships between midday stem-water potential, soil moisture measurements, and walnut shootgrowth. In: Walnut Research Reports. Sacramento, CA, USA, Walnut Marketing Board, pp. 135-143.Goldhamer, D.A., Beede, R., Sibbett, S., Fereres, E., DeJong, T.M., Ramos, D., Katayama, D., Doyle, J. & Day, K.1989. First year effects of controlled deficit irrigation on walnut tree performance. In: Walnut Research Reports.Sacramento, CA, USA, Walnut Marketing Board, pp. 91-100.Goldhamer, D. A., Beede, R., Sibbett, S., Ramos, D. & Van Brocklin, F. 1990. First year recovery following a simulateddrought in walnut. In: Walnut Research Reports. Sacramento, CA, USA, Walnut Marketing Board, pp. 66-72.Goldhamer, D. A. 1997. Irrigation scheduling for walnut orchards. In: Walnut Orchard Management. D. E. Ramos, ed.University of California Publication No. 3373, Oakland, CA pp. 159-166; p. 328.Lampinen, B., Buchner, R., Fulton, A., Frant, J., Mills, N., Prichard, T., Schwankl, L., Shackel, K., Gilles, C., Little, C.,Metcalf, S., Rivers, D. & Gamble, V. 2004. Irrigation management in walnut using evapotranspiration, soil and plantbased data. In: Walnut Research Reports. Sacramento, CA, USA, Walnut Marketing Board, pp. 113-136.WALNUT 413
- Page 369 and 370: Figure 1 Production trends for almo
- Page 371 and 372: FIGURE 2The three stages of almond
- Page 373 and 374: Figure 3Differences in the cultivar
- Page 375 and 376: Indicators of tree water statusTo p
- Page 377 and 378: nuts are rapidly expanding and late
- Page 379 and 380: ReferencesAyars, J.E., Johnson, R.
- Page 381 and 382: Table 2 (Continued)Year TreatmentWa
- Page 383: Table 3 (continued)Potential900 mmA
- Page 386 and 387: Figure 1 Production trends for pear
- Page 388 and 389: (Elkins et al., 2007). The appearan
- Page 390 and 391: out in Spain under more common grow
- Page 392 and 393: Figure 4Relationships between the p
- Page 394 and 395: Data in Figure 5 suggest that there
- Page 396 and 397: e saved, but this causes a reductio
- Page 398: pear 389
- Page 401 and 402: Figure 1 Production trends for peac
- Page 403 and 404: Figure 2bEvolution of vegetative (s
- Page 405 and 406: The postharvest period is important
- Page 407 and 408: the midday stem-water potential in
- Page 409 and 410: PHOTOPeach leaf appearance under th
- Page 411 and 412: FIGURE 5Relation between the crop c
- Page 413 and 414: In applying RDI strategies an impor
- Page 415: peach 407
- Page 418 and 419: Figure 1 Production trends of walnu
- Page 422 and 423: Lead AuthorDavid A. Goldhamer(forme
- Page 424 and 425: Description of the stages of develo
- Page 426 and 427: used to collect the nuts, which are
- Page 428 and 429: yield of marketable product (split
- Page 430 and 431: Figure 4Total tree nut load for tre
- Page 433 and 434: Figure 6Production function develop
- Page 435: ReferencesAydın, Y. 2004. The effe
- Page 438 and 439: Figure 1 Production trends for apri
- Page 440 and 441: Responses to Water DeficitsIn areas
- Page 442 and 443: Figure 4Apricot (cv. Búlida) shoot
- Page 444: apricot 439
- Page 447 and 448: Figure 1 Production trends for avoc
- Page 449 and 450: Stem-water potential (SWP) values a
- Page 451: ReferencesFaber, B., Apaia, M. & M.
- Page 454 and 455: Figure 1 Production trends for swee
- Page 456 and 457: Figure 4Daily patterns of sunlit le
- Page 458 and 459: season (Marsal, 2010). However, the
- Page 460: sweet CHERRY 457
- Page 464 and 465: Figure 1 Grape production between 1
- Page 466 and 467: Table 1Key vegetative and reproduct
- Page 468 and 469: Figure 3Plasticity of flowering of
1 100 mm, a team in California applied 85 percent of ET c through April <strong>to</strong> mature cv. Chicotrees and then progressively lower percentages of ET c as the season progressed (25 percentwas the minimum from early July through the early September harvest) and no postharvestirrigation (Goldhamer et al., 1989). Fruit <strong>yield</strong>s in the drought year were about 10 percentlower than the fully irrigated control (not statistically significant). However in the followingrecovery year, when full irrigation was applied <strong>to</strong> all trees, the drought year trees had about80 percent lower <strong>yield</strong>s almost entirely the result of a lower fruit load. Yields returned <strong>to</strong> nearfull levels during the second recovery year (Goldhamer et al., 1990).It appears that walnut trees do not respond well <strong>to</strong> <strong>water</strong> deficits, regardless of the deficitirrigation strategy, in terms of nut <strong>yield</strong>. This is probably because of the high sensitivity ofshoot growth <strong>to</strong> <strong>water</strong> deficits and, in turn, <strong>to</strong> the heavy dependence of fruit load on theshoot growth of the previous year in walnuts.ReferencesFAO. 2011. FAOSTAT online database, available at link http://faostat.fao.org/. Accessed on December 2011.Ful<strong>to</strong>n, A., Buchner, R., Little, C., Gilles, C., Grant, J., Lampinen, B., Schackel, K., Schwankl, L., Prichard, T. & Rivers,D. 2002. Relationships between midday stem-<strong>water</strong> potential, soil moisture measurements, and walnut shootgrowth. In: Walnut Research Reports. Sacramen<strong>to</strong>, CA, USA, Walnut Marketing Board, pp. 135-143.Goldhamer, D.A., Beede, R., Sibbett, S., Fereres, E., DeJong, T.M., Ramos, D., Katayama, D., Doyle, J. & Day, K.1989. First year effects of controlled deficit irrigation on walnut tree performance. In: Walnut Research Reports.Sacramen<strong>to</strong>, CA, USA, Walnut Marketing Board, pp. 91-100.Goldhamer, D. A., Beede, R., Sibbett, S., Ramos, D. & Van Brocklin, F. 1990. First year recovery following a simulateddrought in walnut. In: Walnut Research Reports. Sacramen<strong>to</strong>, CA, USA, Walnut Marketing Board, pp. 66-72.Goldhamer, D. A. 1997. Irrigation scheduling for walnut orchards. In: Walnut Orchard Management. D. E. Ramos, ed.University of California Publication No. 3373, Oakland, CA pp. 159-166; p. 328.Lampinen, B., Buchner, R., Ful<strong>to</strong>n, A., Frant, J., Mills, N., Prichard, T., Schwankl, L., Shackel, K., Gilles, C., Little, C.,Metcalf, S., Rivers, D. & Gamble, V. 2004. Irrigation management in walnut using evapotranspiration, soil and plantbased data. In: Walnut Research Reports. Sacramen<strong>to</strong>, CA, USA, Walnut Marketing Board, pp. 113-136.WALNUT 413