10.07.2015 Views

Crop yield response to water - Cra

Crop yield response to water - Cra

Crop yield response to water - Cra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FIGURE 5Relation between the crop coefficient (K c ) for drip-irrigated peach trees measured in aweighing lysimeter in central California and the proportion of light interception by the trees.The linear equation approximation <strong>to</strong> calculate the K c is:K c = 0.082 +1.59 (PMLI) (Ayars et al., 2003)1990 1991 1992 199319941.61.41.21Kc0.80.60.40.200 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8Proportion midday light interceptionconcluded that applied <strong>water</strong> may be reduced by 10- 20 percent below the maximum needswithout a negative impact on <strong>yield</strong>. However, the analyses have very seldom included revenueconsiderations, relative <strong>to</strong> the price differential that different sized peach fruit fetches inthe market. The <strong>response</strong> <strong>to</strong> applied <strong>water</strong> depends on the <strong>water</strong> s<strong>to</strong>rage capacity of thesoil, and thus cannot be generalized. Figure 6 shows the relation between <strong>yield</strong> and ET c inrelative terms for different irrigations strategies, full irrigation (Control), RDI, and sustainedDI (SDI). For the optimal RDI regime, it is possible <strong>to</strong> reduce the ET c by 15-20 percent withouta detrimental impact on <strong>yield</strong>. However, when the <strong>water</strong> deficits were imposed on sensitivestages or throughout the season (SDI), a reduction in ET c was accompanied by a <strong>yield</strong> reduction(Figure 6). The differences in the <strong>response</strong>s <strong>to</strong> the various DI regimes illustrate the benefits ofstress management when planning deficit irrigation programmes.SUGGESTED RDI REGImESBased on the results shown above, it can be concluded that RDI strategies applied duringStage II in peach, especially when a fast recovery at the beginning of Stage III can be achieved,has proved <strong>to</strong> be very effective in controlling excessive vegetative growth and improving fruitquality without a <strong>yield</strong> penalty. For early season cultivars, RDI that concentrates the <strong>water</strong>deficits in the postharvest period is an effective strategy, provided severe <strong>water</strong> stress isavoided (Tables 2 and 3). Given the impact that different root zone <strong>water</strong> s<strong>to</strong>rage capacitieshave <strong>to</strong> the <strong>response</strong> <strong>to</strong> RDI, Tables 2 and 3 present different RDI schedules for two types ofsoils (shallow and deep), also giving indications of the minimum stem-<strong>water</strong> potential treescan withstand without having a detrimental effect on <strong>yield</strong>.peach 403

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!