10.07.2015 Views

Crop yield response to water - Cra

Crop yield response to water - Cra

Crop yield response to water - Cra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Data in Figure 5 suggest that there are cultivar differences in the <strong>response</strong> <strong>to</strong> ET c deficits, cv.Conference being more sensitive than Blanquilla (or Spadona). A 30 percent reduction in ET ccaused only a 12 percent <strong>yield</strong> reduction in Blanquilla-Spadona but a 22 percent decrease inConference. However, cultivar <strong>yield</strong> sensitivity <strong>to</strong> ET c deficits was similar once they showed a<strong>response</strong> <strong>to</strong> decreasing relative ET c ; their sensitivity remained similar with a slope for the <strong>yield</strong><strong>response</strong> <strong>to</strong> ET c of 1.2 and 1.0 for Blanquilla and Conference, respectively (Figure 5).An explanation of the differences between cultivars in the <strong>yield</strong>-<strong>response</strong> threshold<strong>to</strong> reduction in ET c may be related <strong>to</strong> a complex interaction between three fac<strong>to</strong>rs: i) thepositive effect of moderate <strong>water</strong> stress on increasing return bloom in the next season, ii)the limited use of fruit thinning as a commercial practice for pear, and iii) the possible fruitset<strong>response</strong> <strong>to</strong> previous season <strong>water</strong> stress. In other words, changes in return bloom as aconsequence of incipient ET c reductions in the previous season, may produce higher croppingnext season, provided fruit set is unaffected. Under these circumstances, increases in cropload leads <strong>to</strong> the production of smaller fruit, but the smaller fruit size at harvest is often morethan compensated by the positive impact of higher fruit number on <strong>yield</strong>. It is interesting <strong>to</strong>Figure 6Relative revenue function developed for RDI strategies that imposed stress during StagesI and II. Data points obtained from studies of at least two year duration. Three studiesfrom Spain and one from Israel were used for the relationship (Source: Marsal et al., 2002ain Blanquilla; Marsal et al., 2008 in Conference; Marsal et al., unpublished in Conference;and Naor et al., 2000 in Spadona). Linear boundary lines consider no differences in cultivar<strong>response</strong> and fitting is performed through linear regression from the observations definingan upper boundary. Note the greater sensitivity <strong>to</strong> ET deficits in terms of revenue than in<strong>yield</strong> terms. FI, RDI-SI, RDI-SII, RDI-PH and SSDI stands for full irrigation, RDI during Stage I offruit growth, RDI during SII of fruit growth, RDI during postharvest and seasonal sustaineddeficit irrigation, respectively.Relative gross revenue1.00.80.60.4'Blanquilla'- Spain Overirrgation'Blanquilla'- Spain FI'Blanquilla'- Spain RDI-SI'Blanquilla'- Spain RDI-SII'Conference'- Spain FI'Conference'- Spain RDI-SII'Conference'- Spain RDI-PH'Spadona'- Israel SSDISlope = 1.30.20.00.00.20.40.6 0.81.0Relative ET Cpear 385

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!