10.07.2015 Views

Crop yield response to water - Cra

Crop yield response to water - Cra

Crop yield response to water - Cra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

same cultivar but used in Italy and Spain, respectively); (Naor et al., 2000; and Marsal et al.,2002a), and two other studies on the cv. Conference; the latter dealing with postharvestdeficit irrigation (Marsal et al., 2008; and Marsal et al., 2010). In these four studies it has beenconsidered that: i) annual ET o and effective rainfall were known, ii) ET c was estimated fromsoil-<strong>water</strong> content variation and applied <strong>water</strong>, and iii) the effects of irrigation on fruit <strong>yield</strong>were considered for two consecutive years. Figure 5 shows the relation between relative fruit<strong>yield</strong> and relative ET c . Relative <strong>yield</strong> is unaffected by ET c deficits of 15-20 percent and thendeclines more or less linearly as ET c deficits become more severe.Figure 6 shows the <strong>water</strong> production function considering relative gross revenue instead of<strong>yield</strong> as a productive parameter. The relative gross revenue penalizes fruit with cheek diametersof less than 65 mm. The prevailing market conditions are very different between these twocultivars, since Conference pears commonly receive a better price than Blanquilla. Prices maychange from country-<strong>to</strong>-country. For the sake of a fair cultivar comparison and <strong>to</strong> avoid thespecificity of country market effects on gross revenues, the pricing criterion of Conference inSpain was applied <strong>to</strong> all reported experiments.Figure 5Production function developed for RDI strategies that imposed stress during Stages I and II.Data points were obtained from studies of at least two-year duration. Three studies from Spainand one from Israel were used for the relationship (Source: Marsal et al., 2002a in Blanquilla;Marsal et al., 2008 in Conference; Marsal et al., unpublished in Conference; and Naor et al., 2000in Spadona). Linear boundary lines consider separate cultivar fitting through linear regressionfrom the observations defining an upper boundary. FI, RDI-SI, RDI-SII, RDI-PH and SSDI standfor full irrigation, RDI during Stage I of fruit growth, RDI during SII of fruit growth, RDI duringpostharvest and seasonal sustained deficit irrigation, respectively.1.00.8Blanquilla - Spain OverirrgationBlanquilla - Spain FIBlanquilla - Spain RDI-SIBlanquilla - Spain RDI-SIIConference - Spain FIConference - Spain RDI-SIIConference - Spain RDI-PHSpadona - Israel SSDIRelative <strong>yield</strong>0.60.4Slope Blanquilla = 1.2Slope Conference = 1.00.20.00.00.20.40.6 0.81.0Relative ET C384crop <strong>yield</strong> <strong>response</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>water</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!