10.07.2015 Views

Crop yield response to water - Cra

Crop yield response to water - Cra

Crop yield response to water - Cra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The fruit with fleshy pericarp is classified as a drupe and is single-seeded. Fruit growth followsthe typical double-sigmoid pattern, with rapid exponential growth during the cell divisionphase (Stage I, ~ 30 days in length), followed by a relatively short period of slow growth duringpit hardening and embryo development (lag phase, Stage II). Finally, a second period of rapidcell and fruit enlargement prior <strong>to</strong> harvest (Stage III), when the fruit can increase in size ca. 40-60 percent, although this is linked <strong>to</strong> accumulated heat units (degree-days) after flowering, ina similar fashion <strong>to</strong> other Prunus species (DeJong and Goudriaan, 1989). Therefore, the lengthof each stage varies with variety and location. During the postharvest period, some shootgrowth and carbohydrate s<strong>to</strong>rage for reserves are the primary sinks for carbon assimilation,which continues until leaf fall.Effects of Water DeficitsA distinction should be made between plums for fresh fruit production and those for driedfruit production (prunes), as dry matter accumulation is less sensitive <strong>to</strong> <strong>water</strong> stress thanis the increase in fresh weight, particularly during the last stages of fruit development. Inaddition, lower fruit hydration rates resulting from <strong>water</strong> deficits may also offer an advantagefor post‐harvest fruit processing in the case of prunes for dry fruit production (Lampinenet al., 1995). Thus, prune trees are considered <strong>to</strong> be moderately resistant <strong>to</strong> <strong>water</strong> stress,as indicated by early experiments (Hendrickson and Veihmeyer, 1945) in the deep soils ofCalifornia’s Sacramen<strong>to</strong> Valley, where it <strong>to</strong>ok 4 years of no irrigation <strong>to</strong> detect decreased trunkgrowth, and 5 years of <strong>water</strong> deprivation <strong>to</strong> detect a significant reduction of fruit <strong>yield</strong>s. Thisis also supported by more recent findings (Goldhamer et al., 1994) where irrigation cu<strong>to</strong>ff, up<strong>to</strong> 37 days before harvest did not have any negative impact on dry fruit <strong>yield</strong>s of French prune.Water stress during fruit growthIn Japanese plums for fresh markets, <strong>water</strong> stress in the final stages of fruit growthsignificantly decreased fruit size, but accelerate ripening and lead <strong>to</strong> an increase in fruitsugar concentration (Naor, 2004). Under <strong>water</strong> stress, average fruit weight and <strong>yield</strong> wereaffected by increased tree crop load for Japanese plum (Intrigliolo and Castel, 2005; Naor,2004) but under minimum stress conditions, the fruit size distribution was unaffected by fruitnumber per tree, possibly because of low crop <strong>yield</strong>s, which did not introduce significantlimitation of assimilates (Naor, 2004). Irrigation of previously <strong>water</strong>-stressed prune treeshas been found <strong>to</strong> induce fruit-end cracking (Uriu et al., 1962); the formation of cracks wasaccompanied by increased osmotic potential gradients along the fruit in re-<strong>water</strong>ed trees(Milad and Shackel, 1992).Water stress during postharvestThe practice of reducing or eliminating irrigation after harvest of an early-maturing plumcultivar (P. salicina) irrigated with foggers was studied in California (Johnson et al., 1994),where completely cutting off irrigation led <strong>to</strong> partial defoliation within a few weeks andloss of <strong>yield</strong> in the subsequent year. Postharvest midday stem-<strong>water</strong> potential (SWP) reached~-3.3 MPa with no symp<strong>to</strong>ms of defoliation in Black Amber (Naor, 2004). For trees that wereirrigated daily, but at half the rate of the fully irrigated control, no reduction of <strong>yield</strong> orfruit quality occurred over a 3-year period, possibly because of the contribution of s<strong>to</strong>red350crop <strong>yield</strong> <strong>response</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>water</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!