10.07.2015 Views

Crop yield response to water - Cra

Crop yield response to water - Cra

Crop yield response to water - Cra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

oth irrigation level and crop load. However, as fruit size is a major attribute of fruit quality,growers are interested in larger fruit up <strong>to</strong> a certain limit, where oversize apples will fetch alower price. The <strong>yield</strong> of large fruit is affected by both irrigation and crop load (Figure 4). At lowcrop loads, there is no advantage of increasing irrigation, as similar crop <strong>yield</strong>s were obtainedin one experiment where irrigation levels between June and harvest ranged from 46 percent <strong>to</strong>119 percent of ET o (Naor et al., 1997).Figure 4 Effect of the number of fruit per tree (1 250 trees/ha) on apple <strong>yield</strong> (>70 mm in diameter) atdifferent irrigation levels (ET o ) from mid-June <strong>to</strong> harvest. Bars denote Standard Error (Naoret al., 1997).80<strong>Crop</strong> <strong>yield</strong> >70 mm in diameter (<strong>to</strong>nne/ha)604020Irrigation coefficientrelative <strong>to</strong> ETo0.470.650.841.011.1900100200300 400500Fruit per treeThe <strong>water</strong> deficits may reduce tree size in the following year, but do not negatively affectflower bud number or fruit load (Girona et al., 2008). As crop load increased (double numberof fruit per tree), <strong>yield</strong> of large fruit increased with increasing irrigation levels. This indicates anincreased limitation in assimilate availability that cannot be overcome by supplying additional<strong>water</strong> above full requirements. At the highest crop load, <strong>yield</strong> of large fruit did not respond <strong>to</strong>a seasonal irrigation level above 84 percent of ET o , which is more or less equivalent <strong>to</strong> apple ET cduring the irrigation period (see below).Fruit size increased with increasing midday stem-<strong>water</strong> potential (SWP: Figure 5) where different<strong>response</strong> curves were observed for different crop loads. The threshold of midday SWP <strong>to</strong> reachmarketable size fruit shifted <strong>to</strong> higher stem-<strong>water</strong> potentials with increasing crop load. For croploads up <strong>to</strong> medium levels, maximum fruit size can be achevied by improving tree <strong>water</strong> status.However, at extremely high crop load, marketable size fruit cannot be reached even undernon-stress conditions. Therefore, there is an upper limit of crop load that would enable largefruit size, suggesting that both irrigation and fruit-thinning practices should be employed <strong>to</strong>maximize crop <strong>yield</strong> of large, marketable fruit. In some cases, summer pruning can help achievemarketable sizes, as for peach.APPLE 337

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!