Crop yield response to water - Cra
Crop yield response to water - Cra Crop yield response to water - Cra
water stress and thus highly responsive to irrigation (Naor, 2006; Naor et al., 1995 and Gironaet al., 2010). It is also highly responsive to crop load (Naor et al., 2008). Assimilate availability isthus the limiting factor for fulfilling potential fruit size (Naschitz et al., 2010). Water stress notonly limits cell and fruit expansion but also reduces photosynthesis (the source for assimilates),while primarily crop load determines the demand for assimilates and to a certain extent thephotosynthetic rate.Unlike peach, apple does not have distinct stages of fruit growth and a large part of vegetativeand reproductive growth overlap during the growing season. For this reason, deficit irrigationresearchers normally use the terms ‘early-season’ or ‘late-season’ to describe the timing of theirtreatment application. Early season normally indicates the time period before flowering budsare formed for the next season fruit. For most varieties, early season will be before July in theNorthern Hemisphere and before January in the Southern Hemisphere.Early-season water stress reduces apple fruit size (Failla et al., 1992 and Rufat et al., 2003).It also reduces fruit set by dramatically increasing fruitlet drop in temperate zones; in oneexperiment (Powell, 1974), final fruit set decreased from 24 percent for irrigated trees to8.7 percent for non-irrigated trees. In a semi-arid area of Israel, final fruit set of fully-irrigatedtrees was 15 percent decreased to 8 percent in severely stressed trees. Water storage fromwinter precipitation avoids rapid development of severe water stress in most temperateclimatic conditions, but for containerized apples with a limited rooting zone, severe waterstress may cause up to 100 percent fruitlet drop. This suggests that growers should be awareof the risk of severe water stress development early in the season especially during droughtyears, and/or in very shallow soils having low water-holding capacity.Late-season water stress that occurs in the post-reproductive cell division stage affects appledepending on the degree of severity. Moderate water stress up to 102 days after full bloomreduced canopy growth (Behboudian et al., 1998), whereas water stress after this period hadno effect. This indicates that shoot growth ends within three months after bloom (Forsheyand Elfving, 1989). An early deficit created moderate water stress and resulted in a lowerreturn bloom, whereas no reduction in return bloom was apparent in a late-deficit treatment(Behboudian et al., 1998). However, if water stress is severe during these later stages it may affectnext year’s growth (Ebel, 1991 and Girona, 2010a). Reductions in return bloom and productivityunder severe water stress have been found in apple. Fruit numbers in the following years wereaffected by severe stress the previous year generated by terminating irrigation in early summer.This was particularly evident in early varieties (Ebel, 1991).The other, above-mentioned studies, where return bloom was not reduced, did not involve sucha severe level of water stress (Behboudian et al., 1998). The reduction in the proportion of returnbloom of apple trees that were moderately stressed early in the season could reduce the size of thebourse shoot that emerges from apple flower buds below the threshold required for its terminalbud to produce a viable flower bud (Lauri et al., 1996). It may well be that bourse shoots had alreadyreached the threshold length prior to the start of late-deficit treatments thus no effect on returnbloom during late water stress was apparent. It has been observed that excessive shading by a densecanopy can also negatively affect return bloom.In most studies early water deficits (for about 2 months post reproductive cell division) reducedapple fruit size (Naor, 2006 and Rufat et al., 2003). In general, total crop yield increases with336crop yield response to water
oth irrigation level and crop load. However, as fruit size is a major attribute of fruit quality,growers are interested in larger fruit up to a certain limit, where oversize apples will fetch alower price. The yield of large fruit is affected by both irrigation and crop load (Figure 4). At lowcrop loads, there is no advantage of increasing irrigation, as similar crop yields were obtainedin one experiment where irrigation levels between June and harvest ranged from 46 percent to119 percent of ET o (Naor et al., 1997).Figure 4 Effect of the number of fruit per tree (1 250 trees/ha) on apple yield (>70 mm in diameter) atdifferent irrigation levels (ET o ) from mid-June to harvest. Bars denote Standard Error (Naoret al., 1997).80Crop yield >70 mm in diameter (tonne/ha)604020Irrigation coefficientrelative to ETo0.470.650.841.011.1900100200300 400500Fruit per treeThe water deficits may reduce tree size in the following year, but do not negatively affectflower bud number or fruit load (Girona et al., 2008). As crop load increased (double numberof fruit per tree), yield of large fruit increased with increasing irrigation levels. This indicates anincreased limitation in assimilate availability that cannot be overcome by supplying additionalwater above full requirements. At the highest crop load, yield of large fruit did not respond toa seasonal irrigation level above 84 percent of ET o , which is more or less equivalent to apple ET cduring the irrigation period (see below).Fruit size increased with increasing midday stem-water potential (SWP: Figure 5) where differentresponse curves were observed for different crop loads. The threshold of midday SWP to reachmarketable size fruit shifted to higher stem-water potentials with increasing crop load. For croploads up to medium levels, maximum fruit size can be achevied by improving tree water status.However, at extremely high crop load, marketable size fruit cannot be reached even undernon-stress conditions. Therefore, there is an upper limit of crop load that would enable largefruit size, suggesting that both irrigation and fruit-thinning practices should be employed tomaximize crop yield of large, marketable fruit. In some cases, summer pruning can help achievemarketable sizes, as for peach.APPLE 337
- Page 298 and 299: opening and photosynthesis relative
- Page 300 and 301: that occur during the periods of fr
- Page 302 and 303: The crop, where price can vary more
- Page 304: Modify horticultural practicesPruni
- Page 307 and 308: FIGURE 13Comparison of yield per un
- Page 309 and 310: season. Thus the risks of salinity
- Page 312: 4.1 Fruit trees and vinesEditor:Eli
- Page 315 and 316: Figure 1 Production trends for oliv
- Page 317 and 318: Figure 2Occurrence and duration of
- Page 320 and 321: The use of displacement sensors to
- Page 322 and 323: Figure 4 Relationship between relat
- Page 324 and 325: Table 3 Sample calculation of month
- Page 326 and 327: clayey soils. If supply is very lim
- Page 329: Lead AuthorDavid A. Goldhamer(forme
- Page 332 and 333: Fruit growth during this stage is t
- Page 334 and 335: Season-long stressSeveral studies h
- Page 336 and 337: Table 1Published monthly crop coeff
- Page 339 and 340: Four crop-water-production function
- Page 341 and 342: size distribution toward more favou
- Page 344 and 345: Lead AuthorSAmos Naor(GRI, Universi
- Page 346 and 347: Apples tend to have a biennial bear
- Page 351 and 352: indicate that deficit irrigation ad
- Page 353 and 354: Figure 7Effect of midday light inte
- Page 355 and 356: Figure 10Response of marketable fru
- Page 357: Failla, O., Zocchi, Z., Treccani, C
- Page 360 and 361: Figure 1 Production trends for plum
- Page 362 and 363: soil water. In young orchards, post
- Page 364 and 365: Figure 3 Relationships between rela
- Page 366: ReferencesAllen, R.G., Pereira, L.S
- Page 369 and 370: Figure 1 Production trends for almo
- Page 371 and 372: FIGURE 2The three stages of almond
- Page 373 and 374: Figure 3Differences in the cultivar
- Page 375 and 376: Indicators of tree water statusTo p
- Page 377 and 378: nuts are rapidly expanding and late
- Page 379 and 380: ReferencesAyars, J.E., Johnson, R.
- Page 381 and 382: Table 2 (Continued)Year TreatmentWa
- Page 383: Table 3 (continued)Potential900 mmA
- Page 386 and 387: Figure 1 Production trends for pear
- Page 388 and 389: (Elkins et al., 2007). The appearan
- Page 390 and 391: out in Spain under more common grow
- Page 392 and 393: Figure 4Relationships between the p
- Page 394 and 395: Data in Figure 5 suggest that there
- Page 396 and 397: e saved, but this causes a reductio
<strong>water</strong> stress and thus highly responsive <strong>to</strong> irrigation (Naor, 2006; Naor et al., 1995 and Gironaet al., 2010). It is also highly responsive <strong>to</strong> crop load (Naor et al., 2008). Assimilate availability isthus the limiting fac<strong>to</strong>r for fulfilling potential fruit size (Naschitz et al., 2010). Water stress no<strong>to</strong>nly limits cell and fruit expansion but also reduces pho<strong>to</strong>synthesis (the source for assimilates),while primarily crop load determines the demand for assimilates and <strong>to</strong> a certain extent thepho<strong>to</strong>synthetic rate.Unlike peach, apple does not have distinct stages of fruit growth and a large part of vegetativeand reproductive growth overlap during the growing season. For this reason, deficit irrigationresearchers normally use the terms ‘early-season’ or ‘late-season’ <strong>to</strong> describe the timing of theirtreatment application. Early season normally indicates the time period before flowering budsare formed for the next season fruit. For most varieties, early season will be before July in theNorthern Hemisphere and before January in the Southern Hemisphere.Early-season <strong>water</strong> stress reduces apple fruit size (Failla et al., 1992 and Rufat et al., 2003).It also reduces fruit set by dramatically increasing fruitlet drop in temperate zones; in oneexperiment (Powell, 1974), final fruit set decreased from 24 percent for irrigated trees <strong>to</strong>8.7 percent for non-irrigated trees. In a semi-arid area of Israel, final fruit set of fully-irrigatedtrees was 15 percent decreased <strong>to</strong> 8 percent in severely stressed trees. Water s<strong>to</strong>rage fromwinter precipitation avoids rapid development of severe <strong>water</strong> stress in most temperateclimatic conditions, but for containerized apples with a limited rooting zone, severe <strong>water</strong>stress may cause up <strong>to</strong> 100 percent fruitlet drop. This suggests that growers should be awareof the risk of severe <strong>water</strong> stress development early in the season especially during droughtyears, and/or in very shallow soils having low <strong>water</strong>-holding capacity.Late-season <strong>water</strong> stress that occurs in the post-reproductive cell division stage affects appledepending on the degree of severity. Moderate <strong>water</strong> stress up <strong>to</strong> 102 days after full bloomreduced canopy growth (Behboudian et al., 1998), whereas <strong>water</strong> stress after this period hadno effect. This indicates that shoot growth ends within three months after bloom (Forsheyand Elfving, 1989). An early deficit created moderate <strong>water</strong> stress and resulted in a lowerreturn bloom, whereas no reduction in return bloom was apparent in a late-deficit treatment(Behboudian et al., 1998). However, if <strong>water</strong> stress is severe during these later stages it may affectnext year’s growth (Ebel, 1991 and Girona, 2010a). Reductions in return bloom and productivityunder severe <strong>water</strong> stress have been found in apple. Fruit numbers in the following years wereaffected by severe stress the previous year generated by terminating irrigation in early summer.This was particularly evident in early varieties (Ebel, 1991).The other, above-mentioned studies, where return bloom was not reduced, did not involve sucha severe level of <strong>water</strong> stress (Behboudian et al., 1998). The reduction in the proportion of returnbloom of apple trees that were moderately stressed early in the season could reduce the size of thebourse shoot that emerges from apple flower buds below the threshold required for its terminalbud <strong>to</strong> produce a viable flower bud (Lauri et al., 1996). It may well be that bourse shoots had alreadyreached the threshold length prior <strong>to</strong> the start of late-deficit treatments thus no effect on returnbloom during late <strong>water</strong> stress was apparent. It has been observed that excessive shading by a densecanopy can also negatively affect return bloom.In most studies early <strong>water</strong> deficits (for about 2 months post reproductive cell division) reducedapple fruit size (Naor, 2006 and Rufat et al., 2003). In general, <strong>to</strong>tal crop <strong>yield</strong> increases with336crop <strong>yield</strong> <strong>response</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>water</strong>