10.07.2015 Views

Crop yield response to water - Cra

Crop yield response to water - Cra

Crop yield response to water - Cra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 3 Sample calculation of monthly <strong>water</strong> budget for irrigation scheduling in a high density (510tree/ha), 5-year-old olive orchard grown in a loam soil at Venturina (central Italy). Two levels(full, deficit) of irrigation are reported yearly ET o = 965 mm; precipitation 708 mm. Floweringoccurred on 13 May 2007. The crop coefficient was 0.55, the coefficient of ground cover 0.8.Average monthly min and max temperatures and ET o are reported. Effective rainfall (ERain)was calculated as 70 percent of <strong>to</strong>tal rainfall (Rain), excluding precipitations less than 4 mm.(Caruso et al., 2011)Month T max (°C) T min (°C)ET o(mm/day)ET c(mm/month)Rain(mm/month)ERain(mm/month)ET c - ERain(mm/month)Fullirrigation(mm/month)Deficitirrigation(mm/month)J 14.7 5.5 0.7 9.6 30 21 -11.4F 15.6 4.6 1 12.3 96.6 67.62 -55.32M 16.4 5.3 1.9 25.9 76.6 53.62 -27.72A 22.3 6.9 3.3 43.6 6.8 4.76 38.84 2.8 2.8M 24.2 10.6 4.3 58.7 130.8 91.56 -32.86 2.8 2.8J 27 14 4.8 63.4 68.8 48.16 15.24 3.9 3.9J 30.3 14.6 5.4 73.7 0.6 0.42 73.28 58.9 19.7A 29.8 12.9 4.3 58.7 36.2 25.34 33.36 36 13S 26.7 10.2 2.8 37 19 13.3 23.7 30.4 30.4O 22.5 7.9 1.5 20.5 88 61.6 -41.1N 16.8 4.7 0.9 11.9 102.6 71.82 -59.92D 18.1 -1.6 0.7 9.24 52.2 36.54 -27.3the <strong>water</strong> supply is normally adequate <strong>to</strong> meet the full ET needs, but as the summer starts andthe ET o increases, supply from the drip system is insufficient and <strong>water</strong> is extracted from thesoil reservoir <strong>to</strong> meet the demand.As the season progresses, <strong>water</strong> deficits set in, <strong>to</strong> increase in severity as the summer advances,but by the end of summer ET o start <strong>to</strong> decline and the rains may arrive. At this time, the levelof stress is reduced or eliminated, which is desirable during the fruit growth and maturationperiod. By manipulating irrigation frequency, the grower can run the system a fixed time(normally at its maximum capacity) and scheduling becomes straightforward. The RDI 2approach permits the installation of irrigation systems designed <strong>to</strong> cope with situations ofvery limited <strong>water</strong> allocation, for instance in cases when <strong>water</strong> is drastically restricted duringmidsummer (mid-July, end of August) for conflicting urban uses (e.g. <strong>to</strong>urism in Liguria, Italy).A key fac<strong>to</strong>r for success with the RDI 2 approach is <strong>to</strong> start irrigating early enough <strong>to</strong> conservethe soil <strong>water</strong> reserve for when the ET o demand is high.The sustained deficit irrigation strategy (SDI) is planned by distributing the <strong>water</strong> deficitproportionally <strong>to</strong> the monthly ET requirements. In this case, for the same amount of <strong>water</strong>,the anticipated <strong>water</strong> deficits are of less magnitude at midsummer than in RDI 1 , while thestress that develops earlier and later in SDI, should be of greater magnitude than in the RDI 1 .310crop <strong>yield</strong> <strong>response</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>water</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!