Crop yield response to water - Cra
Crop yield response to water - Cra Crop yield response to water - Cra
ox 7Consumptive and non-consumptive uses of water.Water may be used beneficially for irrigation if used considering ET c for salt leaching or forfrost protection. Irrigation efficiency (IE) is the ratio of beneficial to non-beneficial uses ofwater. Also shown are the various consumptive and non-consumptive uses of water.• Crop ETc• Evaporation for frostprotection or for cooling• Deep percolationfor salt leachingBenef.UsesIE%100%• Weed & Phreatophyte ET• E from spray jets• E from soil, reservoirs& canals• Excess deep percolation• Excess runoff• SpillsNon-Benef.Uses(100-IE)%ConsumptiveUseNon-ConsumptiveUseBox 8 illustrates how the distribution of irrigation water varies in different parts of the field;in some, it exceeds the required depth, while in others it is less than required. The shaded areaindicates the degree of deficit in the field. This deficit could be reduced or even eliminated byapplying a gross irrigation depth in excess of that required, leading to more deep percolationlosses. Systems with high DU have water distribution lines in the Figure of Box 8 that are closeto horizontal, with little water excess and deficit, while lower DU values cause the line to besteeper (more variation among sites within the field) and hence there will be greater lossesand deficits in the field.In order to calculate the gross irrigation requirement (GIR) of an orchard or vineyard, thecomputed ET c , which is considered as the net irrigation requirement (NIR), should be dividedby the application efficiency (AE), as:(11) GIR = NIR / AEWhere AE is expressed as a fraction.This effectively increases the net irrigation amount by an amount determined by the applicationefficiency. For example, an application efficiency of 80 percent requires that 20 percent morewater than the ET c is applied to the field. Knowing the system application efficiency is just asimportant as knowing the ET c when calculating irrigation requirements. It would be uselessto devote effort to calculate precisely calculating the ET c and then not pay attention to theactual delivery process to the field and the degree of uniformity of the irrigation system.Yield Response to Water of Fruit Trees and Vines 269
ox 8 Spatial relation between the distribution of water over a field and its area.The Figure shows a simplified diagram of the spatial distribution of irrigation depth,X, as a function of fractional irrigated area. The two straight lines represent thehypothetical relationships between the depth of water applied (X, normalized withrespect to the required depth to refill the soil water deficit prior to irrigation) as afunction of the fraction of the irrigated area. The two inclined lines represent thedistribution of water for full and for deficit irrigation. Note that under full irrigation,50 percent of the area receives water in excess of the required depth, X R , needed torefill the root zone. The slope of the line represents the degree of uniformity; thesteeper the slope, the less uniform the irrigation application would be.Normalizedirrigationwater (X)0Deficit irrigationX R1OverirrigationFull irrigationDeficit200.25 0.50 0.751.00Fraction of irrigated areaPeriodic monitoring of irrigation uniformity is an important component of a good irrigationmaintenance programme.IRRIGATION SCHEDULINGBackgroundThe goal of irrigation scheduling is to determine how to supply the tree or vine with thecorrect amount of water at the appropriate time. Irrigation is applied to avoid tree waterdeficits that are not compatible with management objectives. The usual objective of themanager is to maximize net economic benefit, which does not always coincide with maximumyields, as when deficit irrigation can improve fruit quality and thus crop value. Most growersmake irrigation decisions based on their practical experience and consider the practicallimitations of their systems. Research has developed technical scheduling procedures tooptimize orchard water management. Technical procedures are adopted by growers who270crop yield response to water
- Page 233 and 234: SalinityAlfalfa is tolerant to rela
- Page 237 and 238: Lead AuthorAsha Karunaratne(formerl
- Page 239 and 240: Generally, the growing season begin
- Page 241 and 242: FAO. 2011. FAOSTAT online database,
- Page 244 and 245: *Flower and grain colour presented
- Page 246 and 247: Figure 1 World quinoa harvested are
- Page 248 and 249: with typical values around 10.5 g/m
- Page 250: ReferencesAlvarez-Jubete, L., Arend
- Page 254 and 255: Growth and developmentThe common me
- Page 256 and 257: soils (EARO, 2002). Tef has some to
- Page 258: tef 243
- Page 261 and 262: Lead AuthorsElias Fereres(Universit
- Page 264: equirements per unit land area for
- Page 268 and 269: figure 6 The water balance of an or
- Page 270 and 271: ox 2 Understanding the transpiratio
- Page 272: Orchard transpirationTree Tr is det
- Page 276 and 277: ox 4 Sample calculation of E dz , E
- Page 278 and 279: ox 5 Computing olive tree transpira
- Page 280 and 281: FIGURE 10 Crop coefficient (K c ) c
- Page 282 and 283: For training systems on a vertical
- Page 286 and 287: are seeking more precision in their
- Page 288 and 289: ox 9 Examples of soil water monitor
- Page 290 and 291: ox 10 (CONTINUED)The major limitati
- Page 292 and 293: ox 12Definition of CWSI and an exam
- Page 294 and 295: The water budget methodWith this me
- Page 296 and 297: ox 15 Evolution of soil water under
- Page 298 and 299: opening and photosynthesis relative
- Page 300 and 301: that occur during the periods of fr
- Page 302 and 303: The crop, where price can vary more
- Page 304: Modify horticultural practicesPruni
- Page 307 and 308: FIGURE 13Comparison of yield per un
- Page 309 and 310: season. Thus the risks of salinity
- Page 312: 4.1 Fruit trees and vinesEditor:Eli
- Page 315 and 316: Figure 1 Production trends for oliv
- Page 317 and 318: Figure 2Occurrence and duration of
- Page 320 and 321: The use of displacement sensors to
- Page 322 and 323: Figure 4 Relationship between relat
- Page 324 and 325: Table 3 Sample calculation of month
- Page 326 and 327: clayey soils. If supply is very lim
- Page 329: Lead AuthorDavid A. Goldhamer(forme
- Page 332 and 333: Fruit growth during this stage is t
ox 7Consumptive and non-consumptive uses of <strong>water</strong>.Water may be used beneficially for irrigation if used considering ET c for salt leaching or forfrost protection. Irrigation efficiency (IE) is the ratio of beneficial <strong>to</strong> non-beneficial uses of<strong>water</strong>. Also shown are the various consumptive and non-consumptive uses of <strong>water</strong>.• <strong>Crop</strong> ETc• Evaporation for frostprotection or for cooling• Deep percolationfor salt leachingBenef.UsesIE%100%• Weed & Phrea<strong>to</strong>phyte ET• E from spray jets• E from soil, reservoirs& canals• Excess deep percolation• Excess runoff• SpillsNon-Benef.Uses(100-IE)%ConsumptiveUseNon-ConsumptiveUseBox 8 illustrates how the distribution of irrigation <strong>water</strong> varies in different parts of the field;in some, it exceeds the required depth, while in others it is less than required. The shaded areaindicates the degree of deficit in the field. This deficit could be reduced or even eliminated byapplying a gross irrigation depth in excess of that required, leading <strong>to</strong> more deep percolationlosses. Systems with high DU have <strong>water</strong> distribution lines in the Figure of Box 8 that are close<strong>to</strong> horizontal, with little <strong>water</strong> excess and deficit, while lower DU values cause the line <strong>to</strong> besteeper (more variation among sites within the field) and hence there will be greater lossesand deficits in the field.In order <strong>to</strong> calculate the gross irrigation requirement (GIR) of an orchard or vineyard, thecomputed ET c , which is considered as the net irrigation requirement (NIR), should be dividedby the application efficiency (AE), as:(11) GIR = NIR / AEWhere AE is expressed as a fraction.This effectively increases the net irrigation amount by an amount determined by the applicationefficiency. For example, an application efficiency of 80 percent requires that 20 percent more<strong>water</strong> than the ET c is applied <strong>to</strong> the field. Knowing the system application efficiency is just asimportant as knowing the ET c when calculating irrigation requirements. It would be useless<strong>to</strong> devote effort <strong>to</strong> calculate precisely calculating the ET c and then not pay attention <strong>to</strong> theactual delivery process <strong>to</strong> the field and the degree of uniformity of the irrigation system.Yield Response <strong>to</strong> Water of Fruit Trees and Vines 269