Crop yield response to water - Cra
Crop yield response to water - Cra Crop yield response to water - Cra
FAO. 2011. FAOSTAT online database, available at link http://faostat.fao.org/. Accessed on December 2011.GAEZ. 2011. Global Agro-Ecological Zones ver. 3.0, FAO, IIASA.Garcia-Vila, M., Fereres, E., Mateos, L., Orgaz, F. & Steduto, P. 2009. Deficit irrigation optimization of cotton withAquaCrop. Agronomy Journal 101: 477-487.Gowda, P.H., Baumhardt, R.L., Esparza, A.M., Marek, T.H. & Howell, T.A. 2007. Suitability of cotton as an alternativecrop in the Ogallala Aquifer Region. Agronomy Journal 99: 1397-1403.Grismer, M.E. 2002. Regional cotton line yield, ET c , and water value in Arizona and California. Agric. Water Manage.54, 227–242.Howell, T.A., Meron, M., Davis, K.R., Phene, C.J. & Yamada, H. 1987. Water management of trickle and furrowirrigated narrow row cotton in the San Joaquin Valley. Appl. Eng. Agric. 3, 222–227.Howell, T.A., Evett, S.R., Tolk, J.A. & Schneider, A.D. 2002. Evapotranspiration of full-, deficit-irrigated and drylandcotton on the northern Texas High Plains. In: C.M Burt and S.S. Anderson (eds.) Proceedings 2002 USCID/EWRIConference. Energy, Climate, Environment and Water - Issues and Opportunities for Irrigation and Drainage. USCommittee on Irrigation and Drainage. pp. 321-339.Howell, T.A., Evett, S.R., Tolk, J.A. & Schneider, A.D. 2004. Evapotranspiration of full-, deficit-irrigated, and drylandcotton on the Northern Texas High Plains. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering (ASCE) 130(4):277-285.Hunsaker, D.J. 1999. Basal crop coefficients and water use for early maturity cotton. Trans. ASAE 42(4): 927-936.Hunsaker, D.J., Barnes, E.M., Clarke, T.R., Fitzgerald, G.J. & G.J. Pinter, G.J., Jr. 2005. Cotton irrigation schedulingusing remotely sensed and FAO-56 basal crop coefficients. Trans. ASAE 48(4):1395−1407.Ibragimov, Nazirbay, Evett, S. R., Esanbekov, Y., Kamilov, B.S., Mirzaev, L. & Lamers, John P.A. 2007. Water useefficiency of irrigated cotton in Uzbekistan under drip and furrow irrigation. Agricultural Water Management90(2007):112–120.Ko, J., Piccinni, G., Marek, T. & Howell, T. 2009. Determination of growth-stage-specific crop coefficients (K c ) ofcotton and wheat. Agricultural Water Management. 96:1691–1697.Martin, E.C., Stephens, W., Wiedenfeld, R., Bittenbender, H.C., Beasly Jr., J.P., Moore, J.M., Neibling, H. & Gallian,J.J. 2007. Chapter 9, Sugar, oil, and fibre. pp. 279-335. In: Lascano, R.J. & Sojka, R.E., eds. Irrigation of AgriculturalCrops, Second Edition, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, ASA-CSSA-SSSA.Ng, N., & Loomis, R.S. 1984. Simulation of growth and yield of the potato crop. Wageningen, The Netherlands,PUDOC.Roussopoulos, D., Liakatas, A. & Whittington, W.J. 1998. Controlled-temperature effects on cotton growth anddevelopment. Journal Agricultural Science 130:451-462.Sommer, R., Kienzler, K., Conrad, C., Ibragimov, N., Lamers, J., Martius, C. & Vlek, P. 2008. Evaluation of the CropSystmodel for simulating the potential yield of cotton. Agronomy and Sustainable Development 28:345-354. DOI:10.1051/agro:2008008.Zhang, L., van der Werf, W., Zhang, S., Li, B. & Spiertz, J.H.J. 2008. Temperature-mediated developmental delay maylimit yield of cotton in relay intercrops with wheat. Field Crops Research 106:258–268.cotton 161
- Page 129 and 130: Lead AuthorTheodore C. Hsiao(Univer
- Page 132 and 133: emergence to flowering is about 65
- Page 135 and 136: ReferencesAyers, R.S. & Westcot, D.
- Page 140: Figure 1 World soybean harvested ar
- Page 144 and 145: A number of studies indicate that s
- Page 146: ReferencesBhatia, V.S., Piara Singh
- Page 150 and 151: Figure 1 World barley harvested are
- Page 152: Barley development may be thought o
- Page 155 and 156: The seasonal water requirements for
- Page 159 and 160: Lead AuthorSuhas P. Wani(ICRISAT, A
- Page 161: sowing usually starts in late Septe
- Page 164 and 165: loss. If water stress is severe eno
- Page 166: ReferencesFAO. 2011. FAOSTAT online
- Page 170: Figure 1 World cotton harvested are
- Page 173: Response to StressesCotton stands o
- Page 179: Lead AuthorsMargarita Garcia-Vila(U
- Page 182 and 183: genotypes to photoperiod is variabl
- Page 184: Irrigation practiceSunflower is gro
- Page 190 and 191: Figure 1 World sugarcane harvested
- Page 192 and 193: The stalk is composed of an immatur
- Page 194: Yield and harvest indexCommercial y
- Page 199 and 200: Lead AuthorRoberto Quiroz(CIP, Lima
- Page 201 and 202: quinoa, or vegetables as in the And
- Page 203 and 204: ecommended fertilization rates rang
- Page 208 and 209: Figure 1 World tomato harvested are
- Page 210 and 211: Tomato flowers develop from buds si
- Page 212 and 213: nil at EC e of 13 dS/m in some stud
- Page 214: TOMATO 199
- Page 218 and 219: Figure 1 World sugar beet harvested
- Page 220 and 221: TAbLE 1Phenology of sugar beet in s
- Page 222 and 223: thinning. As mentioned, excessive n
- Page 224: SUGAR BEET 209
FAO. 2011. FAOSTAT online database, available at link http://faostat.fao.org/. Accessed on December 2011.GAEZ. 2011. Global Agro-Ecological Zones ver. 3.0, FAO, IIASA.Garcia-Vila, M., Fereres, E., Mateos, L., Orgaz, F. & Stedu<strong>to</strong>, P. 2009. Deficit irrigation optimization of cot<strong>to</strong>n withAqua<strong>Crop</strong>. Agronomy Journal 101: 477-487.Gowda, P.H., Baumhardt, R.L., Esparza, A.M., Marek, T.H. & Howell, T.A. 2007. Suitability of cot<strong>to</strong>n as an alternativecrop in the Ogallala Aquifer Region. Agronomy Journal 99: 1397-1403.Grismer, M.E. 2002. Regional cot<strong>to</strong>n line <strong>yield</strong>, ET c , and <strong>water</strong> value in Arizona and California. Agric. Water Manage.54, 227–242.Howell, T.A., Meron, M., Davis, K.R., Phene, C.J. & Yamada, H. 1987. Water management of trickle and furrowirrigated narrow row cot<strong>to</strong>n in the San Joaquin Valley. Appl. Eng. Agric. 3, 222–227.Howell, T.A., Evett, S.R., Tolk, J.A. & Schneider, A.D. 2002. Evapotranspiration of full-, deficit-irrigated and drylandcot<strong>to</strong>n on the northern Texas High Plains. In: C.M Burt and S.S. Anderson (eds.) Proceedings 2002 USCID/EWRIConference. Energy, Climate, Environment and Water - Issues and Opportunities for Irrigation and Drainage. USCommittee on Irrigation and Drainage. pp. 321-339.Howell, T.A., Evett, S.R., Tolk, J.A. & Schneider, A.D. 2004. Evapotranspiration of full-, deficit-irrigated, and drylandcot<strong>to</strong>n on the Northern Texas High Plains. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering (ASCE) 130(4):277-285.Hunsaker, D.J. 1999. Basal crop coefficients and <strong>water</strong> use for early maturity cot<strong>to</strong>n. Trans. ASAE 42(4): 927-936.Hunsaker, D.J., Barnes, E.M., Clarke, T.R., Fitzgerald, G.J. & G.J. Pinter, G.J., Jr. 2005. Cot<strong>to</strong>n irrigation schedulingusing remotely sensed and FAO-56 basal crop coefficients. Trans. ASAE 48(4):1395−1407.Ibragimov, Nazirbay, Evett, S. R., Esanbekov, Y., Kamilov, B.S., Mirzaev, L. & Lamers, John P.A. 2007. Water useefficiency of irrigated cot<strong>to</strong>n in Uzbekistan under drip and furrow irrigation. Agricultural Water Management90(2007):112–120.Ko, J., Piccinni, G., Marek, T. & Howell, T. 2009. Determination of growth-stage-specific crop coefficients (K c ) ofcot<strong>to</strong>n and wheat. Agricultural Water Management. 96:1691–1697.Martin, E.C., Stephens, W., Wiedenfeld, R., Bittenbender, H.C., Beasly Jr., J.P., Moore, J.M., Neibling, H. & Gallian,J.J. 2007. Chapter 9, Sugar, oil, and fibre. pp. 279-335. In: Lascano, R.J. & Sojka, R.E., eds. Irrigation of Agricultural<strong>Crop</strong>s, Second Edition, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, ASA-CSSA-SSSA.Ng, N., & Loomis, R.S. 1984. Simulation of growth and <strong>yield</strong> of the pota<strong>to</strong> crop. Wageningen, The Netherlands,PUDOC.Roussopoulos, D., Liakatas, A. & Whitting<strong>to</strong>n, W.J. 1998. Controlled-temperature effects on cot<strong>to</strong>n growth anddevelopment. Journal Agricultural Science 130:451-462.Sommer, R., Kienzler, K., Conrad, C., Ibragimov, N., Lamers, J., Martius, C. & Vlek, P. 2008. Evaluation of the <strong>Crop</strong>Systmodel for simulating the potential <strong>yield</strong> of cot<strong>to</strong>n. Agronomy and Sustainable Development 28:345-354. DOI:10.1051/agro:2008008.Zhang, L., van der Werf, W., Zhang, S., Li, B. & Spiertz, J.H.J. 2008. Temperature-mediated developmental delay maylimit <strong>yield</strong> of cot<strong>to</strong>n in relay intercrops with wheat. Field <strong>Crop</strong>s Research 106:258–268.cot<strong>to</strong>n 161