10.07.2015 Views

Commentary on the Beginning of Damascius' De Primis Principiis

Commentary on the Beginning of Damascius' De Primis Principiis

Commentary on the Beginning of Damascius' De Primis Principiis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2GENERAL REMARKThe first secti<strong>on</strong> is devoted to a searching investigati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> what <strong>the</strong> AbsoluteFirst Principle is. So D. adopts <strong>the</strong> descending order in <strong>the</strong> explanati<strong>on</strong> (i.e.derivati<strong>on</strong>) <strong>of</strong> reality; for in <strong>the</strong> sequel, <strong>the</strong> first principles will be exa mined whichimmediately follow <strong>the</strong> Absolutely first. Not that he disregards <strong>the</strong> ascending process;in fact, as we shall see, he gives two ἀναβάσεις in this secti<strong>on</strong> from what isimmediately given to us to what is <strong>the</strong> ultimate “given” [1] in rerum natura. Bu twhereas <strong>the</strong> ascent is easier inasmuch as we can more readily comprehend <strong>the</strong> order<strong>of</strong> presuppositi<strong>on</strong>, <strong>the</strong> descent is extremely difficult as it relates to <strong>the</strong> order <strong>of</strong>derivati<strong>on</strong>. Even though <strong>the</strong> two orders must be <strong>the</strong> observe and reverse sides <strong>of</strong><strong>on</strong>e and <strong>the</strong> same coin, namely <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>on</strong>tological dependence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lower <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong>higher, and so <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>on</strong>e obtaining structure and order <strong>of</strong> reality, still tounderstand B ’s presupposing A is immensely easier than c<strong>on</strong>ceiving B ’s derivati<strong>on</strong>from A or A ’s producti<strong>on</strong> o r generati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> B. Accordingly D. makes <strong>the</strong> ascent <strong>the</strong>topic <strong>of</strong> a part <strong>of</strong> his first secti<strong>on</strong> (subservient as this ascent is here, let it be als<strong>on</strong>oticed, to <strong>the</strong> proper quasi-apprehensi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> absolutely first principle), butdevotes his whole (incomplete now) work to that all-puzzling descent, choosing topenetrate deeper in each succeeding reality when it is met in <strong>the</strong> downwards processra<strong>the</strong>r than in <strong>the</strong> ascent to <strong>the</strong> ultimate, where he treats <strong>the</strong> realities encounteredsummarily and <strong>on</strong>ly to <strong>the</strong> extent th at some indicati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir nature is required for<strong>the</strong> proper understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ascent itself.The general structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first secti<strong>on</strong> is this:A) Abstract inquiry <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> absolutely Primal Principle1.4 – 18.25B) The Ascent18.26 – 41.20Aa) Is <strong>the</strong> Absolutely First Principle bey<strong>on</strong>d everything and every realitywhatsoever (τὰ πάντα), or is it part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sum-total <strong>of</strong> reality (τὶ τῶν πάντων)?1.4 – 5.2Ab) Why is it not <strong>the</strong> Ἓν <strong>the</strong> Absolutely First Principle?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!