postmodern Satanism

offer the class S as a replacement forT, and hold that S is the class of alltheoretically structural constants. S isconsidered to be a proper subset ofthe larger class M of theoretical worldmodels,such that for all m, where m isan individual theoretical world-model,there exists a proper subset of m,labeled s m , which contains all and onlythose structural constants pertinent tom. S then, is the set of all and onlythose s m ranging over M. Given thatformulation, what can then be said ofthe role of an individual s m within it’scontaining m? Or, in layman’s terms,given an individual theoretical worldmodel,what are to be considered itsstructural constants? The sameness ofthis answer given a variable m is justwhat determines the well-definednature of S. Without getting too farafield of the specific topic at hand, let