postmodern Satanism

More documents

Recommendations

Info

cosmology relevant to the Current, if they are relevant in the firstplace? I.e. could M-Theory's 11 identifiable dimensions becompared/connected with the 10 Sephiroth of theKabbalah/Qlippoth, with the 11th dimension being a transcendenceof the 10 dimensions/Sephiroth?A: When I was at the stage of personal occult development where Iwas feeling out my cosmology, I toyed with the idea that the elevensephiroth (including Daath) were a reflection of the eleven proposeddimensions of superstring theory. But I was making a categoricalerror in understanding both the mathematical notion of “dimension”and the esoteric notion of “emanation” (the meaning of the Hebrewword sephiroth). Often, we are apt to try a “force-fit” when presentedwith a suitable conjunction. Needless to say, I am of the currentscientific opinion that superstring theory is hopelessly flawed, in thatit too misunderstands the concept of dimensionality. And also thatesoteric glyphing schemes, such as the Tree, are metaphor at best. Toanswer the first question, scientific advancement is a product of theCurrent, but neither delimits it nor is limited by it.Q: What is soft Satanism, and how is it a threat to real Satanism?A: Soft Satanism is the view that Satan is a god like unto theChristian god. That he loves you, listens to and answers prayers, ispersonal and interactive - in short, that the Master gives a shit. It is aradical misappraisal of exactly what the Current is, and the mannerin which the spiritual departs from the categorical and material.Often, if not always, it is to be found among those who were at onepoint nominally Christian, and who remain ideologically so. All that’smissing is a dead man on a stick. As to whether it’s a threat - onlyinsofar as it deceives those who are capable of deception, in otherwords, not at all. See other comments above - nothing can be athreat to the pure Satanic outlook, for it rests on facticity alone.Those who “get it” and use the gnosis for personal attainment aregraced by it, those who don’t remain ignorant, shackled, andotherwise fodder for the turning wheel.Q: Why do you term yourself a Satanist rather than a Luciferian?A: Both are applicable, for the Current is dual - see above. As forwhy the linguistic choice of “Satanism” rather than “Luciferianism,”it is a simple case of logical priority. Or, I could be honest and saythat there is a further level of “shock value” and “name recognition”.
In all truth, this is a view which, in and of itself, needs no label. Thelabels serve only to make relevant to a linguistically dependentculture that which is empirically inescapable. The Master is theMaster, whether He is intuited as such or not.Q:In a world where proof is almost demanded of a deity how do youjustify this meta paradigm of Satan’s interaction with the materialworld ?A: I don’t really have to, for the empirical world of phenomena doesthe job for me. If a fool were to ask me to “prove” the existence ofthe Master, I would simply invite them to take this here porterhouseand hand-feed it to that tiger over there.Q:What leads you to believe this idea of Satan could ultimately leadto Dharmakaya ?A: The One is a fractal value of the Other. The path of gnosis leadsfrom a base intuition of the facticity of the phenomenal worldtowards a pure intuition of undiluted holism.Q: What is the intrinsic value of postmodern Satanism, both to theindividual, and the collective ?A: There is no intrinsic value to any worldview, Satanism included.The best that can be had is a relative value, and this would be judgedagainst the way in which holding a particular set of beliefs modifiesthe lives of its adherents. If such a view promoted the betterment ofthe individual, made them more cognizant and more effective, thenwe can say the view has a positive relative value. There is adistinction between a fact and the belief-state whereby said fact isapprehended - this is crucial. The fact of the Current definitely doeshave an intrinsic value, but the apprehension of this fact can onlyhave a relative value, again, depending on how it is put to productiveuse.Q: How does the universal mind become veiled?A: The word “become” betrays a temporal bias which should beabandoned for a pure understanding. The Logos is shattered throughEnumeration, which serves to demarcate each possibleparticularization categorically, allowing perspective to manifest as alimitation. An infinite reality can have no boundaries, and hence noparticularity, but concealed within the continuum are the various
Page 5:
Postmodern SatanismJason King
Page 10 and 11:
standalone interludes. There will b
Page 12 and 13:
of value to the self, such as knowl
Page 14 and 15:
oom with their hand down whileevery
Page 16 and 17:
activity. Many who lack a depth of
Page 18 and 19:
exactly what it is that answers to
Page 20 and 21:
this having been said, it falls to
Page 22 and 23:
ontology involved, which leads me t
Page 24 and 25:
just the way we find it. HenceSatan
Page 26 and 27:
complete gnosis has not yet beenach
Page 28 and 29:
mathematics. The point being made i
Page 30 and 31:
“hidden dimensions” of some the
Page 32 and 33:
common experience must always besub
Page 34 and 35:
incapable of communicating thereali
Page 36 and 37:
Satanist stands. At some point inev
Page 38 and 39:
tradition and religion on the plane
Page 40 and 41:
Theories of Ethics - Philippa FootP
Page 42 and 43:
sheep are victims of their ideologi
Page 44 and 45:
Though many who have chanced toexpo
Page 46 and 47:
undertaking.The Omega Point - the E
Page 48 and 49:
een introduced into the discussion.
Page 50 and 51:
700's AD). It would appear to have
Page 52 and 53:
more commonly, gods), about whichth
Page 54 and 55:
offer the class S as a replacement
Page 56 and 57:
substance, must be provided by thew
Page 58 and 59:
memes empowered by Throne theology
Page 60 and 61:
model. An important fact to conside
Page 62:
need look no further than science.
Page 65 and 66:
transcends our own, yet on the othe
Page 67 and 68:
trans-empirical, and must be intuit
Page 69 and 70:
the cloistering of the spiritual wi
Page 71 and 72:
These false forms of coalescence ar
Page 73 and 74:
.-3).1:2 I exercise dominion over a
Page 75 and 76:
Middle Eastern religions: divine om
Page 77 and 78:
ye do not know what those who are w
Page 79 and 80:
dualizing mind, or in other words,b
Page 81 and 82:
And their children, and so on. Try
Page 83 and 84:
an electromagnetic field in order t
Page 85 and 86:
natural inclination, and is in some
Page 87 and 88:
men.16. For he is ever a sun, and s
Page 89 and 90:
Gods; and let Asar be with Isa, who
Page 91 and 92:
4. Yet she shall be known & I never
Page 93 and 94:
32. Also reason is a lie; for there
Page 95 and 96:
70. There is help & hope in other s
Page 97 and 98:
24. The best blood is of the moon,
Page 99 and 100:
streets, and die cold and an-hunger
Page 101 and 102:
ever. There cometh one to follow th
Page 103 and 104:
The thesis to be established is as
Page 105 and 106:
me: then expect the direful judgmen
Page 107 and 108:
capable, i.e. spreading the Glad Wo
Page 109 and 110:
of Will. And conversely for RHP: se
Page 111 and 112:
Magus employs a balancedexpression.
Page 113 and 114:
energy flow (LHP, RHP) arerepresent
Page 115 and 116:
spinal cord (corresponding to chakr
Page 117 and 118:
different stages; the act is compat
Page 119 and 120: complementation of the Red and Blue
Page 121 and 122: geometers will have their way. Buto
Page 123 and 124: somehow assumes that what separates
Page 125 and 126: life being remembered. Reincarnatio
Page 127 and 128: The Tree of Life is a glyph represe
Page 129 and 130: ational. In other words, the very r
Page 131 and 132: “cutting through” (Tibetan: Tre
Page 133 and 134: So they will never cease nor underg
Page 135 and 136: But in reality it is unchanging lik
Page 137 and 138: The purpose of [the teaching on the
Page 139 and 140: So, extremely proud ones, who are p
Page 141 and 142: Then all the phenomena of perceptio
Page 143 and 144: With confidence (in the foregoing)
Page 145 and 146: So, things to be rejected, antidote
Page 147 and 148: “how to” textbooks concerning t
Page 149 and 150: sees it as permeating material real
Page 151 and 152: the best in mankind, and yet also t
Page 153 and 154: as the “naming species” whichco
Page 155 and 156: When chancing to examine thevarious
Page 157 and 158: understanding. Whereas the religion
Page 159 and 160: ehind virtually every large-scaleat
Page 161 and 162: mongering. And though it may appear
Page 163 and 164: prior to action, and acts only towa
Page 165 and 166: of the system being espoused.Q: Wha
Page 167 and 168: along the RHP and LHP respectively.
Page 169: layman’s terms, Relativity depend
Page 173 and 174: added, this does not imply itssimpl
Page 175 and 176: particularity and very existence.DI
Page 177 and 178: Epilogue: The SatanistThe Satanist
Page 181 and 182: Appendix 1: Two Libers(Note: both o
Page 183 and 184: the sheep.8. Let those who follow t
Page 185 and 186: or nothing.Comment: Satan inspires
Page 187 and 188: 29. Cursed be those who deny my rea
Page 189 and 190: 12. Be not mistaken, for though I c
Page 191 and 192: this earth once more, these Gates w
Page 193 and 194: Appendix 2: The Postmodern Pentagra
show all

postmodern Satanism

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?