TOXICOLOGICAL PROFILE FOR CHROMIUM - Davidborowski.com

TOXICOLOGICAL PROFILE FOR CHROMIUM - Davidborowski.com TOXICOLOGICAL PROFILE FOR CHROMIUM - Davidborowski.com

davidborowski.com
from davidborowski.com More from this publisher
10.07.2015 Views

CHROMIUM 3266. ANALYTICAL METHODSprecipitation. These methods have a number of inherent limitations including being tedious and subjectto considerable interindividual and interlaboratory variations (Singh et al. 1998b). Only one study hasattempted to utilize this biomarker, and it was found that volunteers exposed to chromium in drinkingwater showed no increase in protein-DNA crosslinking in blood cells (Kuykendall et al. 1996). Thissuggests that this procedure may not be sensitive enough for use in environmental monitoring unless anindividual has received a potentially toxic level of exposure. Chromium forms chromium-DNAcomplexes inside of cells and these complexes constitute a potential biomarker for the assessment ofenvironmental or occupational exposure. Recently, a novel method has been described for the sensitivedetection of chromium-DNA adducts using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (Singh et al.1998b). The detection limits of this method are in the parts per trillion range and allows for the detectionof as few as 2 chromium adducts per 10,000 bases, which coupled with the low DNA samplerequirements, make this method sensitive enough to measure background levels in the population. Thereare no data to determine whether there are age-specific biomarkers of exposure or effects or anyinteractions with other chemicals that would be specific for children.Methods for Determining Parent Compounds and Degradation Products in EnvironmentalMedia. Air contaminated with chromium(VI), particularly in occupational settings, are of greatconcern. Methods have been developed that can determine low levels of total chromium andchromium(VI) in the air (Barrie and Hoff 1985; CARB 1990; NIOSH 1994c, 1994d; Sheehan et al. 1992).These methods have detection limits in the ng/m 3 range with excellent recoveries (90% or better). Thesemethods are sufficient to determine background chromium levels in the environment and levels at whichhealth effects may occur. Chromium can be detected in water at concentrations in the ppb range (EPA1983, 1996a; Harzdorf and Janser 1984) with recoveries of 90% or greater being reported. Methods areavailable that can differentiate chromium(VI) from chromium(III) in water samples (EPA 1986c). Areliable analytical method for extracting and quantifying chromium, including chromium(VI), from soilsurfaces has also been reported (EPA 1997). Current analytical methods exist that are sufficient formeasuring background levels of chromium in soil (EPA 1996b, 1997) and water (EPA 1983, 1986a,1996a).6.3.2 Ongoing StudiesNo ongoing studies regarding the determination of different speciated forms of chromium (as opposed tototal chromium content) in biological or some environmental media (e.g., soil, sediment) were found.

CHROMIUM 3277. REGULATIONS AND ADVISORIESInternational, national, and state regulations and guidelines pertinent to human exposure to chromium aresummarized in Table 7-1.Chromium disposal is regulated by the Clean Water Act Effluent Guidelines for the following industrialpoint sources: textiles, electroplating, organic chemicals, inorganic chemicals, petroleum refining, ironand steel manufacturing, nonferrous metal manufacturing, steam electric, ferroalloy, leather tanning andfinishing, asbestos, rubber, timber products processing, metal finishing, mineral mining, paving androofing, paint formulating, ink formulating, gum and wood, carbon black, battery manufacturing, coilcoating, porcelain enameling, aluminum forming, copper forming, electrical and electronic components,and nonferrous metals forming (EPA 1998b).An MRL of 0.000005 mg chromium(VI)/m 3 has been derived for intermediate-duration inhalationexposure to chromium(VI) as chromium trioxide mist and other dissolved hexavalent chromium aerosolsand mists. The MRL is based on a LOAEL of 0.002 mg chromium(VI)/m 3 for upper respiratory effects inhumans in the occupational exposure study by Lindberg and Hedenstierna (1983) which spanned bothintermediate and chronic durations.In the 1998 Draft for Public Comment, an MRL of 0.0001 mg chromium(VI)/m 3 had been derived forboth intermediate and chronic exposures as chromium trioxide mist and other dissolved hexavalentchromium aerosols and mists. This MRL was also based on the study Lindberg and Hedenstierna (1983),but an exposure level of 0.001 mg chromium(VI)/m 3 had been considered a NOAEL, and there had beenno adjustment from intermittent to continuous exposure. Further evaluation of this study indicated that aNOAEL could not be clearly defined; therefore, the LOAEL of 0.002 mg chromium(VI)/m 3 was selectedand adjusted for continuous exposure for the concern that the nasal lesions could accumulate at a greaterrate than the repair mechanisms. The MRL of 0.000005 mg/m 3 no longer applies for chronic exposurebecause concern that carcinogenicity associated with chronic exposure to hexavalent chromiumcompounds takes precedence.An MRL of 0.001 mg chromium(VI)/m 3 has been derived for intermediate-duration inhalation exposureto chromium(VI) as particulate hexavalent chromium compounds. The MRL is based on a benchmarkconcentration of 0.016 mg chromium(VI)/m 3 for increases in lactate dehydrogenase activity inbronchiolavage fluid from rats in the study by Glaser et al. (1990).

<strong>CHROMIUM</strong> 3277. REGULATIONS AND ADVISORIESInternational, national, and state regulations and guidelines pertinent to human exposure to chromium aresummarized in Table 7-1.Chromium disposal is regulated by the Clean Water Act Effluent Guidelines for the following industrialpoint sources: textiles, electroplating, organic chemicals, inorganic chemicals, petroleum refining, ironand steel manufacturing, nonferrous metal manufacturing, steam electric, ferroalloy, leather tanning andfinishing, asbestos, rubber, timber products processing, metal finishing, mineral mining, paving androofing, paint formulating, ink formulating, gum and wood, carbon black, battery manufacturing, coilcoating, porcelain enameling, aluminum forming, copper forming, electrical and electronic <strong>com</strong>ponents,and nonferrous metals forming (EPA 1998b).An MRL of 0.000005 mg chromium(VI)/m 3 has been derived for intermediate-duration inhalationexposure to chromium(VI) as chromium trioxide mist and other dissolved hexavalent chromium aerosolsand mists. The MRL is based on a LOAEL of 0.002 mg chromium(VI)/m 3 for upper respiratory effects inhumans in the occupational exposure study by Lindberg and Hedenstierna (1983) which spanned bothintermediate and chronic durations.In the 1998 Draft for Public Comment, an MRL of 0.0001 mg chromium(VI)/m 3 had been derived forboth intermediate and chronic exposures as chromium trioxide mist and other dissolved hexavalentchromium aerosols and mists. This MRL was also based on the study Lindberg and Hedenstierna (1983),but an exposure level of 0.001 mg chromium(VI)/m 3 had been considered a NOAEL, and there had beenno adjustment from intermittent to continuous exposure. Further evaluation of this study indicated that aNOAEL could not be clearly defined; therefore, the LOAEL of 0.002 mg chromium(VI)/m 3 was selectedand adjusted for continuous exposure for the concern that the nasal lesions could accumulate at a greaterrate than the repair mechanisms. The MRL of 0.000005 mg/m 3 no longer applies for chronic exposurebecause concern that carcinogenicity associated with chronic exposure to hexavalent chromium<strong>com</strong>pounds takes precedence.An MRL of 0.001 mg chromium(VI)/m 3 has been derived for intermediate-duration inhalation exposureto chromium(VI) as particulate hexavalent chromium <strong>com</strong>pounds. The MRL is based on a benchmarkconcentration of 0.016 mg chromium(VI)/m 3 for increases in lactate dehydrogenase activity inbronchiolavage fluid from rats in the study by Glaser et al. (1990).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!