TOXICOLOGICAL PROFILE FOR CHROMIUM - Davidborowski.com
TOXICOLOGICAL PROFILE FOR CHROMIUM - Davidborowski.com TOXICOLOGICAL PROFILE FOR CHROMIUM - Davidborowski.com
CHROMIUM 2965. POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSUREmay exist in the aerobic zone of some natural soil. The oxidation of chromium(III) to chromium(VI) insoil is facilitated by the presence of low oxidizable organic substances, oxygen, manganese dioxide, andmoisture. Oxidation is also enhanced at elevated temperatures in surface soil that result from brush fires(Calder 1988; Cary 1982). Organic forms of chromium(III) (e.g., humic acid complexes) are more easilyoxidized than insoluble oxides. However, oxidation of chromium(III) to chromium(VI) was not observedin soil under conditions of maximum aeration and a maximum pH of 7.3 (Bartlett and Kimble 1976). Itwas later reported that soluble chromium(III) in soil can be partly oxidized to chromium(VI) bymanganese dioxide in soil, and the process is enhanced by pH higher than six (Bartlett 1991). Becausemost chromium(III) in soil is immobilized due to adsorption and complexation with soil materials, thebarrier to this oxidation process is the lack of availability of mobile chromium(III) to immobilemanganese dioxide in soil surfaces. Due to this lack of availability of mobile chromium(III) tomanganese dioxide surfaces, a large portion of chromium in soil will not be oxidized to chromium(VI),even in the presence of manganese dioxide and favorable pH conditions (Bartlett 1991; James et al.1997).The microbial reduction of chromium(VI) to chromium(III) has been discussed as a possible remediationtechnique in heavily contaminated environmental media or wastes (Chen and Hao 1998). Factorsaffecting the microbial reduction of chromium(VI) to chromium(III) include biomass concentration,initial chromium(VI) concentration, temperature, pH, carbon source, oxidation-reduction potential and thepresence of both oxyanions and metal cations. Although high levels of chromium(VI) are toxic to mostmicrobes, several resistant bacterial species have been identified which could ultimately be employed inremediation strategies (Chen and Hao 1998). Elemental iron, sodium sulfite, sodium hydrosulfite, sodiumbisulfite, sodium metabisulfite sulfur dioxide and certain organic compounds such as hydroquinone havealso been shown to reduce chromium(VI) to chromium(III) and have been discussed as possibleremediation techniques in heavily contaminated soils (James et al. 1997; Higgins et al. 1997). Thelimitations and efficacy of these and all remediation techniques are dependent upon the ease in which thereducing agents are incorporated into the contaminated soils.5.4 LEVELS MONITORED OR ESTIMATED IN THE ENVIRONMENTReliable evaluation of the potential for human exposure to chromium depends in part on the reliability ofsupporting analytical data from environmental samples and biological specimens. In reviewing data onchromium levels monitored or estimated in the environment, it should also be noted that the amount ofchemical identified analytically is not necessarily equivalent to the amount that is bioavailable.
CHROMIUM 2975. POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE5.4.1 AirThe atmospheric total chromium concentration in the United States is typically
- Page 266 and 267: CHROMIUM 2462. HEALTH EFFECTS(Nette
- Page 268 and 269: CHROMIUM 2482. HEALTH EFFECTSsperma
- Page 270 and 271: CHROMIUM 2502. HEALTH EFFECTSThere
- Page 272 and 273: CHROMIUM 2522. HEALTH EFFECTStimesp
- Page 274 and 275: CHROMIUM 2542. HEALTH EFFECTSShmito
- Page 276 and 277: CHROMIUM 2562. HEALTH EFFECTShas no
- Page 278 and 279: CHROMIUM 2582. HEALTH EFFECTSTable
- Page 280 and 281: CharacteristicSynonym(s)Table 3-1.
- Page 282 and 283: CharacteristicSynonym(s)Table 3-1.
- Page 284 and 285: CharacteristicSynonym(s)Table 3-1.
- Page 286 and 287: CHROMIUM 2663. CHEMICAL AND PHYSICA
- Page 288 and 289: CHROMIUM 2683. CHEMICAL AND PHYSICA
- Page 290 and 291: CHROMIUM 2703. CHEMICAL AND PHYSICA
- Page 292 and 293: CHROMIUM 2723. CHEMICAL AND PHYSICA
- Page 294 and 295: CHROMIUM 2744. PRODUCTION, IMPORT/E
- Page 296 and 297: CHROMIUM 2764. PRODUCTION, IMPORT/E
- Page 298 and 299: CHROMIUM 2784. PRODUCTION, IMPORT/E
- Page 301 and 302: CHROMIUM 2815. POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN
- Page 303 and 304: Derived from HazDat 2000Figure 5-2.
- Page 305 and 306: CHROMIUM 2855. POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN
- Page 307 and 308: State bTable 5-2. Releases to the E
- Page 309 and 310: State bTable 5-2. Releases to the E
- Page 311 and 312: CHROMIUM 2915. POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN
- Page 313 and 314: CHROMIUM 2935. POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN
- Page 315: CHROMIUM 2955. POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN
- Page 319 and 320: CHROMIUM 2995. POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN
- Page 321 and 322: CHROMIUM 3015. POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN
- Page 323 and 324: CHROMIUM 3035. POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN
- Page 325 and 326: CHROMIUM 3055. POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN
- Page 327 and 328: CHROMIUM 3075. POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN
- Page 329 and 330: CHROMIUM 3095. POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN
- Page 331 and 332: CHROMIUM 3115. POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN
- Page 333 and 334: CHROMIUM 3135. POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN
- Page 335 and 336: CHROMIUM 3156. ANALYTICAL METHODSTh
- Page 337 and 338: Sample matrixTable 6-1. Analytical
- Page 339 and 340: CHROMIUM 3196. ANALYTICAL METHODS6.
- Page 341 and 342: Sample matrixOccupational air(weldi
- Page 343 and 344: Sample matrixWaste water 1986(chrom
- Page 345 and 346: CHROMIUM 3256. ANALYTICAL METHODS6.
- Page 347 and 348: CHROMIUM 3277. REGULATIONS AND ADVI
- Page 349 and 350: CHROMIUM 3297. REGULATIONS AND ADVI
- Page 351 and 352: CHROMIUM 3317. REGULATIONS AND ADVI
- Page 353 and 354: CHROMIUM 3337. REGULATIONS AND ADVI
- Page 355 and 356: CHROMIUM 3357. REGULATIONS AND ADVI
- Page 357 and 358: CHROMIUM 3377. REGULATIONS AND ADVI
- Page 359 and 360: CHROMIUM 3398. REFERENCES*Aaseth J,
- Page 361 and 362: CHROMIUM 3418. REFERENCES*Anderson
- Page 363 and 364: CHROMIUM 3438. REFERENCES*Baranowsk
- Page 365 and 366: CHROMIUM 3458. REFERENCESBlack CB,
<strong>CHROMIUM</strong> 2965. POTENTIAL <strong>FOR</strong> HUMAN EXPOSUREmay exist in the aerobic zone of some natural soil. The oxidation of chromium(III) to chromium(VI) insoil is facilitated by the presence of low oxidizable organic substances, oxygen, manganese dioxide, andmoisture. Oxidation is also enhanced at elevated temperatures in surface soil that result from brush fires(Calder 1988; Cary 1982). Organic forms of chromium(III) (e.g., humic acid <strong>com</strong>plexes) are more easilyoxidized than insoluble oxides. However, oxidation of chromium(III) to chromium(VI) was not observedin soil under conditions of maximum aeration and a maximum pH of 7.3 (Bartlett and Kimble 1976). Itwas later reported that soluble chromium(III) in soil can be partly oxidized to chromium(VI) bymanganese dioxide in soil, and the process is enhanced by pH higher than six (Bartlett 1991). Becausemost chromium(III) in soil is immobilized due to adsorption and <strong>com</strong>plexation with soil materials, thebarrier to this oxidation process is the lack of availability of mobile chromium(III) to immobilemanganese dioxide in soil surfaces. Due to this lack of availability of mobile chromium(III) tomanganese dioxide surfaces, a large portion of chromium in soil will not be oxidized to chromium(VI),even in the presence of manganese dioxide and favorable pH conditions (Bartlett 1991; James et al.1997).The microbial reduction of chromium(VI) to chromium(III) has been discussed as a possible remediationtechnique in heavily contaminated environmental media or wastes (Chen and Hao 1998). Factorsaffecting the microbial reduction of chromium(VI) to chromium(III) include biomass concentration,initial chromium(VI) concentration, temperature, pH, carbon source, oxidation-reduction potential and thepresence of both oxyanions and metal cations. Although high levels of chromium(VI) are toxic to mostmicrobes, several resistant bacterial species have been identified which could ultimately be employed inremediation strategies (Chen and Hao 1998). Elemental iron, sodium sulfite, sodium hydrosulfite, sodiumbisulfite, sodium metabisulfite sulfur dioxide and certain organic <strong>com</strong>pounds such as hydroquinone havealso been shown to reduce chromium(VI) to chromium(III) and have been discussed as possibleremediation techniques in heavily contaminated soils (James et al. 1997; Higgins et al. 1997). Thelimitations and efficacy of these and all remediation techniques are dependent upon the ease in which thereducing agents are incorporated into the contaminated soils.5.4 LEVELS MONITORED OR ESTIMATED IN THE ENVIRONMENTReliable evaluation of the potential for human exposure to chromium depends in part on the reliability ofsupporting analytical data from environmental samples and biological specimens. In reviewing data onchromium levels monitored or estimated in the environment, it should also be noted that the amount ofchemical identified analytically is not necessarily equivalent to the amount that is bioavailable.