10.07.2015 Views

Purchasing a cardiac CT scanner: What the radiologist needs to know

Purchasing a cardiac CT scanner: What the radiologist needs to know

Purchasing a cardiac CT scanner: What the radiologist needs to know

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Purchasing</strong> a <strong>cardiac</strong> <strong>CT</strong> <strong>scanner</strong>:<strong>What</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>radiologist</strong> <strong>needs</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>know</strong>Maria LewisImPA<strong>CT</strong>St George’s Hospital, Londonmaria.lewis@stgeorges.nhs.ukUKRC 2010


Conventional C<strong>CT</strong>A scan modes• Helical• Axial (Step and Shoot)– constant mA– with ‘padding’Max– mA modulated– single phaseMinUKRC 2010IrradiationReconstruction


Cardiac <strong>CT</strong>: technical requirements (C<strong>CT</strong>A)• Temporal resolution• Spatial resolution• Volume coverage• Dose• O<strong>the</strong>r considerationsUKRC 2010


Cardiac <strong>CT</strong>: technical requirements (C<strong>CT</strong>A)• Temporal resolution• Spatial resolution• Volume coverage• Dose• O<strong>the</strong>r considerationsUKRC 2010


Temporal resolution• Reconstruct images in most stationary phase of <strong>cardiac</strong>cycle– best phase dependant on heart ratephaseCardiacmotiontUKRC 2010Optimal reconphase


How <strong>to</strong> improve temporal resolution• Fast rotation times– currently 270 – 350 ms– 360° reconstruction not suitable• Half-scan reconstruction method– temporal resolution (TR) ≅ ½ rotation time60 bpmR – R~ 1000 ms~ 150 ms300 ms rotation150 msUKRC 2010


How <strong>to</strong> improve temporal resolution• Multi-segment reconstruction– uses multiple heart beats for image reconstruction– 2 segments: max TR ~ 1 /4 rotation time– 3 segments: max TR ~ 1 /6 rotation time ….etc• Temporal resolution achieved dependent on heart rate– can be optimised by adjusting rotation time300 ms rotation1st 90°data2nd 90°data1 st heartbeatUKRC 2010temporalresolution75 ms2 nd heartbeat


Temporal resolutionScanner modelTubes(#)Rotation(ms)Temporal resolution(ms)AxialHelicalGE Discovery <strong>CT</strong>750 HD135017544 - 175Philips Brilliance i<strong>CT</strong>127013534 - 135Siemens Definition Flash22857538 - 75Toshiba Aquilion ONE135035 - 17535 - 175UKRC 2010


Cardiac <strong>CT</strong>: technical requirements• Temporal resolution• Spatial resolution• Volume coverage• Dose• O<strong>the</strong>r considerationsUKRC 2010


Spatial resolution• Ability <strong>to</strong> discern small, high contraststructures10 line pairs/cm≡ 0.5 mm• Isotropic spatial resolution required– equal resolution in all planesUKRC 2010Voxel size: x=y=z


Spatial resolution• Spatial resolution dependent on– focal spot and detec<strong>to</strong>r size– sampling density• Also dependent on– reconstruction parameters e.g. reconstruction filter– temporal resolutionScan axis(z)Scan plane(x-y)UKRC 201040 mm (64 x 0.625 mm)


How <strong>to</strong> improve spatial resolution• Flying (dynamic) focal spot (FFS)– improves sampling density– reduces artefactsx-y planeFFS availabilityManufacturer*x-y planez-axisGEPhilipsYesYesNoYesz-axis(helical)0,6 mmSiemensYesYes0,6 mmToshibaNoNo* Not available on all <strong>scanner</strong> modelsUKRC 2010


Spatial resolution• Limiting spatial resolution:– up <strong>to</strong> 15 - 25 lp/cm (0.3 - 0.2 mm) in scan plane– up <strong>to</strong> ~13 lp/cm (0.4 mm) in z-axisCourtesy Siemens• Sharpest reconstruction filters result in high noise• Generally for standard <strong>cardiac</strong> scans– x-y plane resolution ~ 8 lp/cm (0.6 mm)– z-axis resolution ~ 13 lp/cm (0.4 mm)• For reduced ‘blooming’ e.g. stents, calcium– sharper filters may be used ~ 10 lp/cm (0.5 mm)UKRC 2010Images from Lin, EC et al; http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1603072-overview


Cardiac <strong>CT</strong>: technical requirements• Temporal resolution• Spatial resolution• Volume coverage• Dose• O<strong>the</strong>r considerationsUKRC 2010


Volume coverage• z-axis detec<strong>to</strong>r configuration of <strong>to</strong>p-of-<strong>the</strong>-range <strong>CT</strong> <strong>scanner</strong>sSiemens Soma<strong>to</strong>m Definition Flash – ‘128 slice <strong>scanner</strong>’64 x 0.6 mmGE Discovery <strong>CT</strong>750 HD – ‘64 slice <strong>scanner</strong>’64 x 0.625 mmPhilips Brilliance i<strong>CT</strong> – ‘256 slice <strong>scanner</strong>’128 x 0.625 mm128 data channels*38.4 mm coverage64 data channels40 mm coverage256 data channels**80 mm coverageToshiba Aquilion ONE – ‘640 slice <strong>scanner</strong>’320 x 0.5 mm320 data channels***160 mm coveragez-axis* 64 detec<strong>to</strong>r banks double-sampled** 128 detec<strong>to</strong>r banks double-sampled*** 640 slices from one axial acquisitionUKRC 2010


Volume coverage• Consider detec<strong>to</strong>r length NOT ‘no. of slices’• Number of heart beats required <strong>to</strong> cover volume depends on– detec<strong>to</strong>r length– scan modeNo. of heart beats required: 140 mm length, single segmentDetec<strong>to</strong>r length (mm)Scan mode4080160Axial (step and shoot)731Helical – low pitch42-Helical – high pitch1--UKRC 2010


Volume coverage – ‘single beat’• Full organ coverage– <strong>cardiac</strong> scanning: triggered axial mode, no table movement• Single beat, single rotation– standard C<strong>CT</strong>A• Single beat, multiple rotations– increased flexibility• Single beat, modulated– C<strong>CT</strong>A + functional• Multi-beat, pulsed– C<strong>CT</strong>A, multi-segment• Multi-beat, continuous– perfusionUKRC 2010Irradiation


Volume coverage• Wide detec<strong>to</strong>r coverage– cone beam artefact: 3D reconstruction method– scatter: software corrections– roof-<strong>to</strong>p effect: software corrections available on some systemsImagedvolumeUKRC 2010Nominal detec<strong>to</strong>rarray width defined atiso-centre


Volume coverage• Reduced roof-<strong>to</strong>p effect – Toshiba Aquilion ONEVersion 4.51 Version 4.61160 mm125 mmUKRC 2010


Volume coverage – ‘single beat’• High pitch helical (Siemens ‘Flash’ mode)– prospectively triggered helical mode– couch speed ~ 135 mm per rotation– <strong>cardiac</strong> volume acquired within single heartbeatFlash mode < 1 sec (Pitch 3.4)Tube 1Tube 2RRUKRC 2010


Volume coverage• High pitch helical– limited <strong>to</strong> lower heart rates (


Cardiac <strong>CT</strong>: technical requirements• Temporal resolution• Spatial resolution• Volume coverage• Image noise• Dose• O<strong>the</strong>r considerationsUKRC 2010


Dose in <strong>cardiac</strong> <strong>CT</strong>• Dose primarily dependent on:– scan mode– scan pro<strong>to</strong>col– dose reduction features• Choice of scan mode and pro<strong>to</strong>col dependent on patient– heart rate– heart rate variability– patient sizeUKRC 2010


Dose in <strong>cardiac</strong> <strong>CT</strong>• Scan modeHelicalconstant mAmodulated mAAxialfull cyclenarrow windowUKRC 2010


Dose in Cardiac <strong>CT</strong>Variation of dose with scan mode: Siemens Definition Flash**Helical – low pitch scan – no ECG modulation : 10 mSvScan modeMaximum mA windowDose outside max mA windowAxial (step and shoot)01.2Narrow(Single phase)4%*Effective dose (mSv)25%04.8Wide(40% phase range)4%*25%Helical – low pitch1.73.45.66.4Helical – high pitch (Flash mode)0.8* Siemens MinDose**Doses obtained using Siemens’ Cardiac Dose Calcula<strong>to</strong>r (Accuracy ±10%)Assuming: 60 bpm, BMI 25; 0.014 mSv/DLPScan parameters: 100 kV, 160 mAs/rot/tube, 140 mm scan lengthScanner software version VA 34UKRC 2010


Dose in <strong>cardiac</strong> <strong>CT</strong>• Selection of appropriate mA and kV– au<strong>to</strong>matic selection of mA may beavailable• Use of small FOV bow-tie filter– reduces peripheral dose• Use of iterative reconstruction– less noise at same dose– ~ 50% dose reduction for sameimage quality claimedFBPASIRUKRC 2010From Silva et al AJR Jan 2010


Dose in <strong>cardiac</strong> <strong>CT</strong>• All manufacturers offer iterative reconstructionManufacturerGEPhilipsSiemensToshibaIterative reconstructionAdaptive Statistical Image Reconstruction (ASIR)iDOSEIterative Reconstruction in Image Space (IRIS)Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction (AIDR)• Second generation iterative reconstruction methodscurrently in developmente.g. GE: Model-based Iterative Reconstruction (Veo)Siemens: Sinogram Affirmative Iterative Reconstruction (SAFIRE)UKRC 2010


Dose in <strong>cardiac</strong> <strong>CT</strong>• Optimisation of scan length:Dose increase ~10% per cm 1– ‘adaptive collimation’ for wide beamaxial scans– ‘dynamic collimation’ <strong>to</strong> reduce overrangingin helical scansIrradiatedrange• Partial irradiation <strong>to</strong> reduce surfaceorgan doseLow dose– breast dose reduction up <strong>to</strong> 40% 2Imaged rangeSiemens X-CAREX-rays OFF1With a base scan length of 10 cm2Kalender W. et al. Reduction of dose <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> female breast inthoracic <strong>CT</strong>; European Society of Radiology 2008; 18: 1674-1682UKRC 2010High doseCourtesy Siemens Medical Systems


Cardiac <strong>CT</strong>: technical requirements• Temporal resolution• Spatial resolution• Volume coverage• Image noise• Dose• O<strong>the</strong>r considerationsUKRC 2010


O<strong>the</strong>r considerations• User-friendliness– au<strong>to</strong>mated scan parameter optimisation– applications software / post-processing• Additional features– dual energy for e.g. myocardial perfusion, direct boneremoval, virtual non-contrast, plaque differentiation….UKRC 2010


O<strong>the</strong>r considerations• Dual energy approachesManufacturerSiemensGEPhilipsDual energy methodDual source technologyRapid kV switching with ‘flying-focal spot’Dual-layer detec<strong>to</strong>rPhilips dual-layer detec<strong>to</strong>rLow energyx-raysUKRC 2010High energy x-rays


Conclusions• Cardiac <strong>CT</strong> scans benefit particularly from a high temporaland spatial resolution as well as fast volume coverage• Cardiac doses depend largely on scan mode – choice ofmode is mainly patient determined• Optimal parameters and dose saving features should be used• Manufacturers have moved in different directions in <strong>scanner</strong>development• The ‘best’ <strong>scanner</strong> is dependent on local <strong>needs</strong>– dedicated <strong>cardiac</strong>, dedicated A&E, general purpose <strong>scanner</strong>…• …and also £££££UKRC 2010


Market reviewMarket review: Advanced <strong>CT</strong> <strong>scanner</strong>s for coronary angiographyCEP10043, March 2010www.dh.gov.uk/cepwww.impactscan.orgUKRC 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!