10.07.2015 Views

evaluation of soil compaction in a high density apple orchard under ...

evaluation of soil compaction in a high density apple orchard under ...

evaluation of soil compaction in a high density apple orchard under ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> <strong>soil</strong> type on the values <strong>of</strong> ratios between technological traffic zonesconcern<strong>in</strong>g studied physical propertiesTable 2Soildepth(cm)Reported<strong>soil</strong>physicalpropertya1 a2 a3 LSD 5%c1 c2 c3 c1 c2 c3 c1 c2 c3 e f5-10 1 1,26 1,13 1,25 1,23 1,18 1,21 1,05 1,15 1,10 0,064 0,1132 0,44 0,48 0,47 0,56 0,45 0,19 0,73 1,46 1,41 0,461 0,9453 5,26 3,51 4,43 3,34 2,70 3,55 3,05 2,46 2,69 0,977 NS15-20 1 1,08 1,01 1,00 1,15 1,10 1,09 1,11 1,10 1,09 0,062 0,0892 5,16 4,66 4,32 0,45 0,78 0,79 0,78 1,62 1,11 NS NS3 2,33 2,48 2,27 2,48 1,94 2,33 3,23 2,28 2,16 0,800 NS35-40 1 1,00 1,01 1,14 1,11 1,11 1,13 1,11 1,10 1,09 0,065 0,0992 0,93 1,57 0,66 0,79 0,54 0,33 0,76 1,72 0,99 0,649 NS3 2,14 1,85 2,21 2,38 1,60 3,03 1,64 2,11 2,36 0,590 NS55-60 1 1,08 1,08 1,02 1,13 1,13 1,09 1,14 1,12 1,08 0,059 NS2 1,06 1,24 0,64 0,57 0,40 0,35 0,74 0,69 0,62 0,545 NS3 1,80 1,27 1,48 1,70 1,70 2,44 2,92 1,88 1,77 0,545 NSReported <strong>soil</strong> physical property: 1 = bulk <strong>density</strong>; 2 = saturated hydraulic conductivity; 3 = resistance to penetrationLSD 5%: e= constant a, c different; f = constant c,‣ Influence <strong>of</strong> period <strong>of</strong> time from treesplant<strong>in</strong>g on the value <strong>of</strong> ratios between thetechnological traffic zones concern<strong>in</strong>g thephysical properties analyzed.(Interaction <strong>of</strong>experimental factors B/C)For the three physical properties <strong>under</strong> study andfour <strong>soil</strong> depths analyzed, the number <strong>of</strong> cases <strong>in</strong> whichthe three <strong>compaction</strong> <strong>in</strong>dices were significantlydifferent between them was at 20 years from treesplant<strong>in</strong>g (33% <strong>of</strong> total analyzed cases) compared to theperiod <strong>of</strong> time located at 4 years <strong>of</strong> their plant<strong>in</strong>g(25%). For the two periods from trees plant<strong>in</strong>g and four<strong>soil</strong> depths analyzed, the number <strong>of</strong> cases <strong>in</strong> which thethree <strong>compaction</strong> <strong>in</strong>dices were significantly differentbetween them was <strong>high</strong>est for RP (33% <strong>of</strong> all casesanalyzed ), followed by BD (25%), and K sat was on thelast place (21%). For the two periods from treesplant<strong>in</strong>g and the three physical properties <strong>in</strong> the study,the number <strong>of</strong> cases <strong>in</strong> which the three <strong>compaction</strong><strong>in</strong>dices were significantly different between them, wassimilar to the depths <strong>of</strong> 5-10 cm and 35-40 cm (33 % <strong>of</strong>the total number <strong>of</strong> analyzed cases), the 55-60 cm <strong>soil</strong>depth was ranked second (22%) and 15-20 cm <strong>soil</strong>depth, was situated on the last place (17%).For the three <strong>soil</strong> physical properties studied andthe four <strong>soil</strong> depths analyzed, <strong>compaction</strong> <strong>in</strong>dex 1recorded the <strong>high</strong>est number <strong>of</strong> cases <strong>in</strong> which it wassignificantly different between the two periods fromthe trees plant<strong>in</strong>g (33% <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> cases).For the <strong>compaction</strong> <strong>in</strong>dex 3, this number was 25% andfor <strong>compaction</strong> <strong>in</strong>dex 2, there was no case <strong>of</strong>significant difference.For the four <strong>soil</strong> depths analyzed, the number <strong>of</strong>cases <strong>in</strong> which the three <strong>compaction</strong> <strong>in</strong>dices weresignificantly different between the two periods s<strong>in</strong>cetrees plant<strong>in</strong>g was <strong>high</strong>est for RP (42% <strong>of</strong> the totalnumber <strong>of</strong> cases). For the two other <strong>soil</strong> physicalproperties (K sat and BD), this number was similar (8%).For the three <strong>soil</strong> physical properties <strong>under</strong>study, the number <strong>of</strong> cases <strong>in</strong> which the three<strong>compaction</strong> <strong>in</strong>dices significantly differed between thetwo periods s<strong>in</strong>ce trees plant<strong>in</strong>g was <strong>high</strong>est on 5-10cm depth (33% <strong>of</strong> the analyzed cases). The 35-40 cm<strong>soil</strong> depth was ranked secondly (16%), the 55-60 cm<strong>soil</strong> depth was situated on 3 rd place, and the depth <strong>of</strong> 15to 20 cm, on the last place, where there was no case <strong>of</strong>significant differentiation.220

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!