Future Development of School Sport - Education Queensland ...
Future Development of School Sport - Education Queensland ...
Future Development of School Sport - Education Queensland ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Future</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> and Phys cal Act v ty Review Report<br />
effect ve when t s comprehens ve, flex ble and coord nated across the ent re school<br />
env ronment. The whole-<strong>of</strong>-school approach <strong>of</strong>fers opportun t es to promote cons stent<br />
messages about rema n ng phys cally act ve and to encourage teachers, parents,<br />
guard ans and volunteers to be phys cally act ve role models and fac l tators. In th s<br />
way, phys cal act v ty can be ncluded n as many school events as poss ble (The State <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Queensland</strong>, 2006).<br />
Certa n groups <strong>of</strong> students are less l kely to part c pate n suffic ent phys cal act v ty<br />
(Chau, 2007). Develop ng nclus ve programs that connect soc al, cultural and<br />
env ronmental spheres s an mportant aspect to encourage part c pat on n phys cal<br />
act v ty (Booth, Owen, Bauman, Clav s & Lesl e, 2000; L ndstrom, Hanson & Ostergren,<br />
2001; Mota, Alme da, Santos & R be ro, 2005; K m, Subraman an, Gortmaker & Kawach ,<br />
2006; Chau, 2007; Ferre ra, van der Horst, Wendel-Vos, Kremers, van Lenthe & Burg,<br />
2007). It s essent al phys cal act v ty programs are culturally and gender sens t ve to<br />
the values and trad t ons <strong>of</strong> part c pants and recogn se the d vers ty <strong>of</strong> nterests w th n<br />
a school commun ty, nclud ng the d fferent needs and range <strong>of</strong> ab l t es for students<br />
(Amer can Academy <strong>of</strong> Ped atr cs, 2000). An nclus ve phys cal act v ty program<br />
ensures a d verse, developmentally-appropr ate range <strong>of</strong> non-compet t ve, compet t ve,<br />
structured and unstructured act v t es are <strong>of</strong>fered (Gebel, K ng, Bauman, V ta, G ll, R gby,<br />
and Capon, 2005).<br />
Best pract ce phys cal act v ty programs are therefore those n wh ch schools are<br />
comm tted to an nclus ve, comprehens ve, developmentally-appropr ate, flex ble and<br />
coord nated approach to phys cal act v ty across the ent re school env ronment. They<br />
prov de a range <strong>of</strong> phys cally act ve opt ons tak ng nto account the d verse range <strong>of</strong><br />
nterests and ab l t es w th n the r school commun ty and value phys cally act ve role<br />
models.<br />
7. Survey <strong>of</strong> key stakeholders<br />
The Rev ew <strong>of</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> and Phys cal Act v ty ncluded surveys <strong>of</strong> key stakeholder<br />
groups. The groups surveyed were:<br />
• a random sample <strong>of</strong> state schools, nclud ng pr mary schools, secondary schools and<br />
spec al schools<br />
• a random sample <strong>of</strong> state schools n Ind genous commun t es<br />
• a random sample <strong>of</strong> spec al schools<br />
• all Reg onal <strong>School</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> Officers<br />
• all State <strong>Sport</strong> ng Organ sat ons<br />
• all <strong>School</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> Comm ttees.<br />
Other stakeholders also had the opportun ty <strong>of</strong> complet ng a survey quest onna re.<br />
Data was gathered from approx mately 270 surveys.<br />
In the collat on <strong>of</strong> data, state schools n Ind genous commun t es and spec al schools<br />
have been reported d scretely. It was dec ded to report spec al schools separately due<br />
to d fferences n class structures and types <strong>of</strong> phys cal act v t es undertaken. Spec al<br />
schools were therefore prov ded w th a mod fied vers on <strong>of</strong> the ma n state school survey.<br />
11