10.07.2015 Views

Perversion the Social Relation

Perversion the Social Relation

Perversion the Social Relation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

66 Bruce Finkin repeating presence-absence games: security of presence is found in <strong>the</strong> possibilityof absence. What is most anxiety producing for <strong>the</strong> child is when <strong>the</strong> relationshipthrough which he comes to be—on <strong>the</strong> basis of lack which makes him desire—is mostperturbed: when <strong>the</strong>re is no possibility of lack, when his mo<strong>the</strong>r is constantly on hisback" (Seminar X, December 5,1961). What this suggests in <strong>the</strong> case of <strong>the</strong> pervert isthat, given <strong>the</strong> overly close mo<strong>the</strong>r-child relationship, not only is <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r not perceivedas lacking, seeming to desire nothing beyond her child (whom she "has"), but<strong>the</strong> child himself cannot sense a lack in his own life and thus cannot desire, strictlyspeaking—cannot come into being as a desiring subject. Desire, Lacan teaches us, isa cover, but also a remedy for anxiety.39 In perversion, <strong>the</strong>re seems to be both a backward-looking and a forward-lookinggesture: <strong>the</strong> former involves <strong>the</strong> attempt to give <strong>the</strong> O<strong>the</strong>r satisfaction; <strong>the</strong> latter, aswe shall see below, seeks to prop up or supplement <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>r's act of naming. Inneurosis, too, <strong>the</strong>re are both backward- and forward-looking gestures: <strong>the</strong> formerinvolves <strong>the</strong> attempt to become what <strong>the</strong> O<strong>the</strong>r desires—in obsession, to perfectlyincarnate <strong>the</strong> signifier of <strong>the</strong> O<strong>the</strong>r's desire (0), in hysteria to perfectly incarnate <strong>the</strong>cause of <strong>the</strong> O<strong>the</strong>r's desire (a)—while <strong>the</strong> latter involves <strong>the</strong> attempt to shake free ofone's fixation on <strong>the</strong> O<strong>the</strong>r's desire, this being <strong>the</strong> analysand's path.40 Consider his comments about <strong>the</strong> advantages of fetishism: "We can now see what <strong>the</strong>fetish achieves and what it is that maintains it. It remains a token of triumph over<strong>the</strong> threat of castration and a protection against it. It also saves <strong>the</strong> fetishist frombecoming a homosexual, by endowing women with <strong>the</strong> characteristic which makes<strong>the</strong>m tolerable as sexual objects. In later life, <strong>the</strong> fetishist feels that he enjoys yet ano<strong>the</strong>radvantage from his substitute for a genital. The meaning of <strong>the</strong> fetish is notknown to o<strong>the</strong>r people, so <strong>the</strong> fetish is not withheld from him: it is easily accessibleand he can readily obtain <strong>the</strong> sexual satisfaction attached to it. What o<strong>the</strong>r men haveto woo and make exertions for can be had by <strong>the</strong> fetishist with no trouble at all"(SE XXI, 154).41 Binding anxiety is, obviously, something that can also be understood in terms of satisfaction,for it lowers <strong>the</strong> level of tension as required by <strong>the</strong> pleasure principle; similarly,<strong>the</strong> pervert's enactment of separation can be understood in terms of satisfaction,as we shall see.42 If we take le désir de la mère (<strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r's desire for <strong>the</strong> child or <strong>the</strong> child's desirefor <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r) as a given, <strong>the</strong> onus very often falls upon <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>r to bring abouttriangulation and separation.43 A person's concrete actions often give us a far better sense of his or her fundamentalfantasy than <strong>the</strong> fantasies of which he or she is aware, especially at <strong>the</strong> beginning ofan analysis.44 In <strong>the</strong> Old Testament, it is <strong>the</strong> voice of God that commands. In Judaism, it is <strong>the</strong> shofarsounded on Yom Kippur that recalls/re-presents <strong>the</strong> voice of God. Lacan discussesthis at length in Seminar X (May 22,1963).45 Kant, for example, attempts to eradicate desire from a moral law that leaves no roomfor human feelings, attachments, and desires in its pursuit of universality (applicable

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!