Perversion the Social Relation
Perversion the Social Relation Perversion the Social Relation
6 4 Bruce Finkcretory functions). It is the mOther's interest in and demands related to the pervert'spenis that are responsible for the intensity of the pervert's drives.25 Though in cases of psychosis, this might well be the case.26 Fetishism, which holds an important theoretical place among the perversions, involvesthe localization of a great deal of libido on a kind of substitute sexual organ(as we shall see in the case study discussed below), and this occurs to a much lesserextent in girls than in boys.27 Similarly, Lacan defines Don Juan as a feminine dream, a dream of a man who islacking nothing ("qui ne manque rien"; Seminar X, March 20,1963); he also refersto Don Juan as a feminine myth (Seminar XX, Encore. On feminine sexuality: Thelimits of love and knowledge, 1972-187$, ed. Jacques-Alain Miller, trans. Bruce Fink[New York and London: W. W. Norton 6c Company, 1998], 10). It should be notedthat Lacan is not necessarily saying that there is absolutely no such thing as femalemasochism, but rather that men tend to see it in women because they want to see itin them, and that it is thus certainly far rarer than men would like to believe.28 "Let us, by definition, call 'heterosexual' those who, regardless of their sex, lovewomen" (Lacan, "L'Étourdit," Scilicet 4 [1973]: 23).29 Jacques Lacan, Écrits, 823; 320. Subsequent references to Écrits appear parentheticallyand include the page number of the original edition followed by the page numberof the English translation.See Jacques-Alain Miller, "On Perversion," in Reading Seminars I and II: Lacan'sReturn to Freud, ed. Bruce Fink, Richard Feldstein, and Maire Jaanus (Albany: SUNYPress, 1996). On page 319, Miller says of female perversion:You have to look for female perversion where it is invisible. Female narcissism maybe taken as a perversion, as an extension of the concept. It is because Woman isOtherness as such or the Other that she spends so much time in front of the mirror—justto recognize herself, or perhaps to recognize herself as Other. Even if itis a myth, it is very important. You may find female perversion in narcissism, atthe core of one's own image, or as Freud proposed, in the child—the child used asan object of satisfaction.In the latter case, we have the mother and the imaginary object, the phallus. Themother here is responsible for the perversion of the male child, but at the same timeuses the child as an instrument of jouissance. According to the preceding formula,you could call that perversion. Was the first perverse couple mother and child?Lacan, in the fifties, suggests that it is in the connection between the mother's ownbody and the child that you may find a concealed expression of female perversion.Insofar as female homosexuality eliminates the male organ, there is some difficultyplacing it in the register of perversion proper.It is not clear to me whether or not Lacan would have equated the "perverse" natureof the mother-child relationship with perverse structure, strictly speaking.30 It should be kept in mind that such weak fathers are well documented in literaturedating back at least to the time of ancient Rome, and that the argument that fathershave lost tremendous power since the last century seems a bit under-demonstrated.
Perversion 6$31 Consider, in the following exchange (from SE X, 17), the way in which his mothertries to prevent him from having a desire for a woman other than herself by guilttrippinghim when he manifests such a desire:Hans: "Oh, then I'll just go downstairs and sleep with Mariedl."Mother: u You really want to go away from Mummy and sleep downstairs?"Hans: "Oh, I'll come up again in the morning to have breakfast and do numberone."Mother: "Well, if you really want to go away from Daddy and Mummy, then takeyour coat and knickers and—good-bye!"31 Indeed, as Freud tells us, the pleasure principle would have us achieve the lowestpossible level of tension or excitation.33 In this book, my comments on the two operations Lacan terms "alienation" and"separation" are fairly basic, as I have discussed them at length in chapters 5 and 6of my The Lacanian Subject. Note here that while the subject comes into being inlanguage through alienation, s/he comes into being as a mere place-holder or lack{manque-à-être). It is separation that provides something more along the lines ofbeing.34 The father fails here to provide the "phallic signifier"—to "unscrew," for example,Hans's imaginary phallus (in one of the boy's dreams, the faucet in the bathtub, asymbol for his penis, is to be replaced by the plumber) and replace it with a symbolicone.35 A subject position, like a symptom, is fundamentally a solution to a problem. Theschema I have provided in Figure 1 of the pervert's solution bears a certain affinity tothe hysteric's solution (though in the former the subject side is altogether missing).There is, nevertheless, an important difference in register between the two: whereasthe hysteric tries to be the object that causes the Other's desire (symbolic), the pervertbecomes the object that causes the Other's jouissance (real), that is, the objectby means of which the Other obtains satisfaction. The hysteric refuses to be the real,physical object by means of which the Other obtains satisfaction.3e The analyst occupies the place of the analysand's question or lack of satisfaction:when there is no question—whether it involves one's reason for being or one's confusionover what gives one sexual satisfaction—or lack, the analyst cannot play hisor her role. As Jacques-Alain Miller says, "You need a certain void or deficit in theplace of sexual enjoyment for the subject supposed to know to arise" ("On Perversion,"310).37 Here, the first libidinal object (that is, the object that provides the child jouissance)is the mother.38 Lacan brings up the question of the lack of lack in a somewhat different context: Itis most commonly believed that a child becomes anxious when its mother is absent,when she is not there with the child; Lacan suggests, on the other hand, that anxietyactually arises owing to a lack of lack, when the mOther is present all the time. "Whatprovokes anxiety? Contrary to what people say, it is neither the rhythm nor the alternationof the mother's presence-absence. What proves this is that the child indulges
- Page 21 and 22: Introduction 13the individual or, b
- Page 23 and 24: W.S.Dennis FosterShortly before the
- Page 25 and 26: Fatal West 17Like Poe's perverse un
- Page 27 and 28: Fatal West 19cost is no reliable gu
- Page 29 and 30: Fatal West 21of limiting, castratin
- Page 31 and 32: Fatal West 23out in the next paragr
- Page 33 and 34: Fatal West 25Burroughs does not sug
- Page 35 and 36: Fatal West 27is associated with Ame
- Page 37 and 38: Fatal West 2,9tiginous sensation of
- Page 39 and 40: Fatal West 31his characters from bo
- Page 41 and 42: Fatal West 33We should not be surpr
- Page 43 and 44: Fatal West 35Burroughs's curious pr
- Page 45 and 46: Fatal West 377 For a good summary o
- Page 47 and 48: Perversion 39The Core of Human Sexu
- Page 49 and 50: Perversion 41tions two examples of
- Page 51 and 52: Perversion 43related symptoms that
- Page 53 and 54: Perversion 45result of the fright o
- Page 55 and 56: Perversion 47To return to the quest
- Page 57 and 58: Perversion 49Lacan tells us, we com
- Page 59 and 60: Perversion 51tern. Lacan's often-re
- Page 61 and 62: Perversion 53Father's "No!"Mother a
- Page 63 and 64: Perversion 55the pervert's sexualit
- Page 65 and 66: Perversion 57power when a judge all
- Page 67 and 68: Perversion 59sions—when allowed t
- Page 69 and 70: Perversion 61in their detailed disc
- Page 71: Perversion 63simultaneously a recog
- Page 75 and 76: Perversion6jto all cases); but mora
- Page 77 and 78: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 79 and 80: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 81 and 82: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 83 and 84: "I Know Well, but All the Same .. .
- Page 85 and 86: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 87 and 88: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 89 and 90: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 91 and 92: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 93 and 94: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 95 and 96: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 97 and 98: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 99 and 100: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 101 and 102: ■xetfcMtuateVahMtinNina SchwartzW
- Page 103 and 104: Exotic Rituals and Family Values 95
- Page 105 and 106: Exotic Rituals and Family Values 97
- Page 107 and 108: Exotic Rituals and Family Values 99
- Page 109 and 110: Exotic Rituals and Family Values 10
- Page 111 and 112: Exotic Rituals and Family Values 10
- Page 113 and 114: Exotic Rituals and Family Values 10
- Page 115 and 116: Exotic Rituals and Family Values 10
- Page 117 and 118: Exotic Rituals and Family Values 10
- Page 119 and 120: Exotic Rituals and Family Valuesin9
- Page 121 and 122: The Masochist Social Link 113neighb
6 4 Bruce Finkcretory functions). It is <strong>the</strong> mO<strong>the</strong>r's interest in and demands related to <strong>the</strong> pervert'spenis that are responsible for <strong>the</strong> intensity of <strong>the</strong> pervert's drives.25 Though in cases of psychosis, this might well be <strong>the</strong> case.26 Fetishism, which holds an important <strong>the</strong>oretical place among <strong>the</strong> perversions, involves<strong>the</strong> localization of a great deal of libido on a kind of substitute sexual organ(as we shall see in <strong>the</strong> case study discussed below), and this occurs to a much lesserextent in girls than in boys.27 Similarly, Lacan defines Don Juan as a feminine dream, a dream of a man who islacking nothing ("qui ne manque rien"; Seminar X, March 20,1963); he also refersto Don Juan as a feminine myth (Seminar XX, Encore. On feminine sexuality: Thelimits of love and knowledge, 1972-187$, ed. Jacques-Alain Miller, trans. Bruce Fink[New York and London: W. W. Norton 6c Company, 1998], 10). It should be notedthat Lacan is not necessarily saying that <strong>the</strong>re is absolutely no such thing as femalemasochism, but ra<strong>the</strong>r that men tend to see it in women because <strong>the</strong>y want to see itin <strong>the</strong>m, and that it is thus certainly far rarer than men would like to believe.28 "Let us, by definition, call 'heterosexual' those who, regardless of <strong>the</strong>ir sex, lovewomen" (Lacan, "L'Étourdit," Scilicet 4 [1973]: 23).29 Jacques Lacan, Écrits, 823; 320. Subsequent references to Écrits appear paren<strong>the</strong>ticallyand include <strong>the</strong> page number of <strong>the</strong> original edition followed by <strong>the</strong> page numberof <strong>the</strong> English translation.See Jacques-Alain Miller, "On <strong>Perversion</strong>," in Reading Seminars I and II: Lacan'sReturn to Freud, ed. Bruce Fink, Richard Feldstein, and Maire Jaanus (Albany: SUNYPress, 1996). On page 319, Miller says of female perversion:You have to look for female perversion where it is invisible. Female narcissism maybe taken as a perversion, as an extension of <strong>the</strong> concept. It is because Woman isO<strong>the</strong>rness as such or <strong>the</strong> O<strong>the</strong>r that she spends so much time in front of <strong>the</strong> mirror—justto recognize herself, or perhaps to recognize herself as O<strong>the</strong>r. Even if itis a myth, it is very important. You may find female perversion in narcissism, at<strong>the</strong> core of one's own image, or as Freud proposed, in <strong>the</strong> child—<strong>the</strong> child used asan object of satisfaction.In <strong>the</strong> latter case, we have <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r and <strong>the</strong> imaginary object, <strong>the</strong> phallus. Themo<strong>the</strong>r here is responsible for <strong>the</strong> perversion of <strong>the</strong> male child, but at <strong>the</strong> same timeuses <strong>the</strong> child as an instrument of jouissance. According to <strong>the</strong> preceding formula,you could call that perversion. Was <strong>the</strong> first perverse couple mo<strong>the</strong>r and child?Lacan, in <strong>the</strong> fifties, suggests that it is in <strong>the</strong> connection between <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r's ownbody and <strong>the</strong> child that you may find a concealed expression of female perversion.Insofar as female homosexuality eliminates <strong>the</strong> male organ, <strong>the</strong>re is some difficultyplacing it in <strong>the</strong> register of perversion proper.It is not clear to me whe<strong>the</strong>r or not Lacan would have equated <strong>the</strong> "perverse" natureof <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r-child relationship with perverse structure, strictly speaking.30 It should be kept in mind that such weak fa<strong>the</strong>rs are well documented in literaturedating back at least to <strong>the</strong> time of ancient Rome, and that <strong>the</strong> argument that fa<strong>the</strong>rshave lost tremendous power since <strong>the</strong> last century seems a bit under-demonstrated.