Perversion the Social Relation

Perversion the Social Relation Perversion the Social Relation

ideiaeideologia.com
from ideiaeideologia.com More from this publisher
10.07.2015 Views

6 4 Bruce Finkcretory functions). It is the mOther's interest in and demands related to the pervert'spenis that are responsible for the intensity of the pervert's drives.25 Though in cases of psychosis, this might well be the case.26 Fetishism, which holds an important theoretical place among the perversions, involvesthe localization of a great deal of libido on a kind of substitute sexual organ(as we shall see in the case study discussed below), and this occurs to a much lesserextent in girls than in boys.27 Similarly, Lacan defines Don Juan as a feminine dream, a dream of a man who islacking nothing ("qui ne manque rien"; Seminar X, March 20,1963); he also refersto Don Juan as a feminine myth (Seminar XX, Encore. On feminine sexuality: Thelimits of love and knowledge, 1972-187$, ed. Jacques-Alain Miller, trans. Bruce Fink[New York and London: W. W. Norton 6c Company, 1998], 10). It should be notedthat Lacan is not necessarily saying that there is absolutely no such thing as femalemasochism, but rather that men tend to see it in women because they want to see itin them, and that it is thus certainly far rarer than men would like to believe.28 "Let us, by definition, call 'heterosexual' those who, regardless of their sex, lovewomen" (Lacan, "L'Étourdit," Scilicet 4 [1973]: 23).29 Jacques Lacan, Écrits, 823; 320. Subsequent references to Écrits appear parentheticallyand include the page number of the original edition followed by the page numberof the English translation.See Jacques-Alain Miller, "On Perversion," in Reading Seminars I and II: Lacan'sReturn to Freud, ed. Bruce Fink, Richard Feldstein, and Maire Jaanus (Albany: SUNYPress, 1996). On page 319, Miller says of female perversion:You have to look for female perversion where it is invisible. Female narcissism maybe taken as a perversion, as an extension of the concept. It is because Woman isOtherness as such or the Other that she spends so much time in front of the mirror—justto recognize herself, or perhaps to recognize herself as Other. Even if itis a myth, it is very important. You may find female perversion in narcissism, atthe core of one's own image, or as Freud proposed, in the child—the child used asan object of satisfaction.In the latter case, we have the mother and the imaginary object, the phallus. Themother here is responsible for the perversion of the male child, but at the same timeuses the child as an instrument of jouissance. According to the preceding formula,you could call that perversion. Was the first perverse couple mother and child?Lacan, in the fifties, suggests that it is in the connection between the mother's ownbody and the child that you may find a concealed expression of female perversion.Insofar as female homosexuality eliminates the male organ, there is some difficultyplacing it in the register of perversion proper.It is not clear to me whether or not Lacan would have equated the "perverse" natureof the mother-child relationship with perverse structure, strictly speaking.30 It should be kept in mind that such weak fathers are well documented in literaturedating back at least to the time of ancient Rome, and that the argument that fathershave lost tremendous power since the last century seems a bit under-demonstrated.

Perversion 6$31 Consider, in the following exchange (from SE X, 17), the way in which his mothertries to prevent him from having a desire for a woman other than herself by guilttrippinghim when he manifests such a desire:Hans: "Oh, then I'll just go downstairs and sleep with Mariedl."Mother: u You really want to go away from Mummy and sleep downstairs?"Hans: "Oh, I'll come up again in the morning to have breakfast and do numberone."Mother: "Well, if you really want to go away from Daddy and Mummy, then takeyour coat and knickers and—good-bye!"31 Indeed, as Freud tells us, the pleasure principle would have us achieve the lowestpossible level of tension or excitation.33 In this book, my comments on the two operations Lacan terms "alienation" and"separation" are fairly basic, as I have discussed them at length in chapters 5 and 6of my The Lacanian Subject. Note here that while the subject comes into being inlanguage through alienation, s/he comes into being as a mere place-holder or lack{manque-à-être). It is separation that provides something more along the lines ofbeing.34 The father fails here to provide the "phallic signifier"—to "unscrew," for example,Hans's imaginary phallus (in one of the boy's dreams, the faucet in the bathtub, asymbol for his penis, is to be replaced by the plumber) and replace it with a symbolicone.35 A subject position, like a symptom, is fundamentally a solution to a problem. Theschema I have provided in Figure 1 of the pervert's solution bears a certain affinity tothe hysteric's solution (though in the former the subject side is altogether missing).There is, nevertheless, an important difference in register between the two: whereasthe hysteric tries to be the object that causes the Other's desire (symbolic), the pervertbecomes the object that causes the Other's jouissance (real), that is, the objectby means of which the Other obtains satisfaction. The hysteric refuses to be the real,physical object by means of which the Other obtains satisfaction.3e The analyst occupies the place of the analysand's question or lack of satisfaction:when there is no question—whether it involves one's reason for being or one's confusionover what gives one sexual satisfaction—or lack, the analyst cannot play hisor her role. As Jacques-Alain Miller says, "You need a certain void or deficit in theplace of sexual enjoyment for the subject supposed to know to arise" ("On Perversion,"310).37 Here, the first libidinal object (that is, the object that provides the child jouissance)is the mother.38 Lacan brings up the question of the lack of lack in a somewhat different context: Itis most commonly believed that a child becomes anxious when its mother is absent,when she is not there with the child; Lacan suggests, on the other hand, that anxietyactually arises owing to a lack of lack, when the mOther is present all the time. "Whatprovokes anxiety? Contrary to what people say, it is neither the rhythm nor the alternationof the mother's presence-absence. What proves this is that the child indulges

6 4 Bruce Finkcretory functions). It is <strong>the</strong> mO<strong>the</strong>r's interest in and demands related to <strong>the</strong> pervert'spenis that are responsible for <strong>the</strong> intensity of <strong>the</strong> pervert's drives.25 Though in cases of psychosis, this might well be <strong>the</strong> case.26 Fetishism, which holds an important <strong>the</strong>oretical place among <strong>the</strong> perversions, involves<strong>the</strong> localization of a great deal of libido on a kind of substitute sexual organ(as we shall see in <strong>the</strong> case study discussed below), and this occurs to a much lesserextent in girls than in boys.27 Similarly, Lacan defines Don Juan as a feminine dream, a dream of a man who islacking nothing ("qui ne manque rien"; Seminar X, March 20,1963); he also refersto Don Juan as a feminine myth (Seminar XX, Encore. On feminine sexuality: Thelimits of love and knowledge, 1972-187$, ed. Jacques-Alain Miller, trans. Bruce Fink[New York and London: W. W. Norton 6c Company, 1998], 10). It should be notedthat Lacan is not necessarily saying that <strong>the</strong>re is absolutely no such thing as femalemasochism, but ra<strong>the</strong>r that men tend to see it in women because <strong>the</strong>y want to see itin <strong>the</strong>m, and that it is thus certainly far rarer than men would like to believe.28 "Let us, by definition, call 'heterosexual' those who, regardless of <strong>the</strong>ir sex, lovewomen" (Lacan, "L'Étourdit," Scilicet 4 [1973]: 23).29 Jacques Lacan, Écrits, 823; 320. Subsequent references to Écrits appear paren<strong>the</strong>ticallyand include <strong>the</strong> page number of <strong>the</strong> original edition followed by <strong>the</strong> page numberof <strong>the</strong> English translation.See Jacques-Alain Miller, "On <strong>Perversion</strong>," in Reading Seminars I and II: Lacan'sReturn to Freud, ed. Bruce Fink, Richard Feldstein, and Maire Jaanus (Albany: SUNYPress, 1996). On page 319, Miller says of female perversion:You have to look for female perversion where it is invisible. Female narcissism maybe taken as a perversion, as an extension of <strong>the</strong> concept. It is because Woman isO<strong>the</strong>rness as such or <strong>the</strong> O<strong>the</strong>r that she spends so much time in front of <strong>the</strong> mirror—justto recognize herself, or perhaps to recognize herself as O<strong>the</strong>r. Even if itis a myth, it is very important. You may find female perversion in narcissism, at<strong>the</strong> core of one's own image, or as Freud proposed, in <strong>the</strong> child—<strong>the</strong> child used asan object of satisfaction.In <strong>the</strong> latter case, we have <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r and <strong>the</strong> imaginary object, <strong>the</strong> phallus. Themo<strong>the</strong>r here is responsible for <strong>the</strong> perversion of <strong>the</strong> male child, but at <strong>the</strong> same timeuses <strong>the</strong> child as an instrument of jouissance. According to <strong>the</strong> preceding formula,you could call that perversion. Was <strong>the</strong> first perverse couple mo<strong>the</strong>r and child?Lacan, in <strong>the</strong> fifties, suggests that it is in <strong>the</strong> connection between <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r's ownbody and <strong>the</strong> child that you may find a concealed expression of female perversion.Insofar as female homosexuality eliminates <strong>the</strong> male organ, <strong>the</strong>re is some difficultyplacing it in <strong>the</strong> register of perversion proper.It is not clear to me whe<strong>the</strong>r or not Lacan would have equated <strong>the</strong> "perverse" natureof <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r-child relationship with perverse structure, strictly speaking.30 It should be kept in mind that such weak fa<strong>the</strong>rs are well documented in literaturedating back at least to <strong>the</strong> time of ancient Rome, and that <strong>the</strong> argument that fa<strong>the</strong>rshave lost tremendous power since <strong>the</strong> last century seems a bit under-demonstrated.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!