Perversion the Social Relation
Perversion the Social Relation Perversion the Social Relation
52 Bruce Finkword is the death of the thing; the thing (the "real lack"), once named,comes into being as a word that can be linked up with other words,joked about, and so on. The word is far less dangerous than the thing itsupposedly signifies or designates, for it actually annihilates the thing,drains away some of its oppressive force.Once that which the mOther is missing is named, the object the childwas for his mOther can no longer be. For once desire is articulated inwords, it does not sit still, but displaces, drifting metonymically fromone thing to the next. Desire is a product of language and cannot besatisfied with an object. The naming of the mOther's desire forces thechild out of his position as object, and propels him into the quest forthe elusive key to her desire. What does she want? Something ineffablethat seems to characterize the endless series of things her desire alightsupon—what in Western society is known as the phallus. No longer thereal object (the real organ) required to complete her, the child can goon to seek to possess what her desire points to, connotes as desirable, asphallic.The mother's lack has to be named or symbolized for the child tocome into being as a full-fledged subject. In perversion, this does notoccur: no signifier is provided that can make that lack come into beingat the level of thought, easing its real weight. Neither the mother northe father provides the articulation necessary for symbolization. As wesee in Freud's work, the question of the mOther's lack often centers, inperversion, around the mOther's genitalia, her sexual difference fromher son.There are two moments of the paternal metaphor. This naming of themOther's desire/lack is the second (logical) moment. If the first momentof the paternal metaphor is the father's prohibition of the child's pleasurablecontact with its mother (prohibition of jouissance), le Nom duPère taking the form of the father's "No!," the second moment involvesthe symbolization of the mOther's lack—that is, its constitution as lackdue to the fact that it is given a name (here we see le Nom du Père asthe name provided by the father, or the father himself as the name of themOther's desire).The two substitutive moments can be represented schematically asfollows:
Perversion 53Father's "No!"Mother as jouissanceFather's nameMother as desireOnly the second moment can be considered genuinely metaphorical,since it is only in the second that language operates in a full-fledgedmanner by naming. These two moments correspond precisely to thetwo schémas provided in Figure 1: the first moment leads to a divisionwithin the mOther, whereby the child comes into being as the objectwith which the Other obtains satisfaction, while the second leads to theadvent of a desiring subject (separate from the Other as source of jouissance).The first corresponds to what Lacan calls alienation, the secondto separation. The firstmay also be fruitfully associated with what Freudcalls primal repression, the second with secondary repression.As I said earlier, my essential thesis here is that, although the perverthas undergone alienation, he has not undergone separation. The psychotichas undergone neither, while the neurotic has undergone both.This can be schematically represented as follows:AlienationSeparationPsychosis Father*$ Father's "No!" Perversion Father's nameNeurosisMother as jouissancePrimary repressionMother as desireSecondary repressionProhibition of jouissanceNaming of lack+
- Page 9 and 10: Molly Anne Rothenbergand Dennis Fos
- Page 11 and 12: Introduction 3necessary passage thr
- Page 13 and 14: Introduction 5jectivity, where enco
- Page 15 and 16: Introduction 7The Potential of Perv
- Page 17 and 18: Introduction 9fact, they are necess
- Page 19 and 20: Introductionnoperate in both desire
- Page 21 and 22: Introduction 13the individual or, b
- Page 23 and 24: W.S.Dennis FosterShortly before the
- Page 25 and 26: Fatal West 17Like Poe's perverse un
- Page 27 and 28: Fatal West 19cost is no reliable gu
- Page 29 and 30: Fatal West 21of limiting, castratin
- Page 31 and 32: Fatal West 23out in the next paragr
- Page 33 and 34: Fatal West 25Burroughs does not sug
- Page 35 and 36: Fatal West 27is associated with Ame
- Page 37 and 38: Fatal West 2,9tiginous sensation of
- Page 39 and 40: Fatal West 31his characters from bo
- Page 41 and 42: Fatal West 33We should not be surpr
- Page 43 and 44: Fatal West 35Burroughs's curious pr
- Page 45 and 46: Fatal West 377 For a good summary o
- Page 47 and 48: Perversion 39The Core of Human Sexu
- Page 49 and 50: Perversion 41tions two examples of
- Page 51 and 52: Perversion 43related symptoms that
- Page 53 and 54: Perversion 45result of the fright o
- Page 55 and 56: Perversion 47To return to the quest
- Page 57 and 58: Perversion 49Lacan tells us, we com
- Page 59: Perversion 51tern. Lacan's often-re
- Page 63 and 64: Perversion 55the pervert's sexualit
- Page 65 and 66: Perversion 57power when a judge all
- Page 67 and 68: Perversion 59sions—when allowed t
- Page 69 and 70: Perversion 61in their detailed disc
- Page 71 and 72: Perversion 63simultaneously a recog
- Page 73 and 74: Perversion 6$31 Consider, in the fo
- Page 75 and 76: Perversion6jto all cases); but mora
- Page 77 and 78: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 79 and 80: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 81 and 82: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 83 and 84: "I Know Well, but All the Same .. .
- Page 85 and 86: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 87 and 88: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 89 and 90: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 91 and 92: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 93 and 94: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 95 and 96: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 97 and 98: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 99 and 100: "I Know Well, but All the Same ..."
- Page 101 and 102: ■xetfcMtuateVahMtinNina SchwartzW
- Page 103 and 104: Exotic Rituals and Family Values 95
- Page 105 and 106: Exotic Rituals and Family Values 97
- Page 107 and 108: Exotic Rituals and Family Values 99
- Page 109 and 110: Exotic Rituals and Family Values 10
<strong>Perversion</strong> 53Fa<strong>the</strong>r's "No!"Mo<strong>the</strong>r as jouissanceFa<strong>the</strong>r's nameMo<strong>the</strong>r as desireOnly <strong>the</strong> second moment can be considered genuinely metaphorical,since it is only in <strong>the</strong> second that language operates in a full-fledgedmanner by naming. These two moments correspond precisely to <strong>the</strong>two schémas provided in Figure 1: <strong>the</strong> first moment leads to a divisionwithin <strong>the</strong> mO<strong>the</strong>r, whereby <strong>the</strong> child comes into being as <strong>the</strong> objectwith which <strong>the</strong> O<strong>the</strong>r obtains satisfaction, while <strong>the</strong> second leads to <strong>the</strong>advent of a desiring subject (separate from <strong>the</strong> O<strong>the</strong>r as source of jouissance).The first corresponds to what Lacan calls alienation, <strong>the</strong> secondto separation. The firstmay also be fruitfully associated with what Freudcalls primal repression, <strong>the</strong> second with secondary repression.As I said earlier, my essential <strong>the</strong>sis here is that, although <strong>the</strong> perverthas undergone alienation, he has not undergone separation. The psychotichas undergone nei<strong>the</strong>r, while <strong>the</strong> neurotic has undergone both.This can be schematically represented as follows:AlienationSeparationPsychosis Fa<strong>the</strong>r*$ Fa<strong>the</strong>r's "No!" <strong>Perversion</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r's nameNeurosisMo<strong>the</strong>r as jouissancePrimary repressionMo<strong>the</strong>r as desireSecondary repressionProhibition of jouissanceNaming of lack+
Change language